Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
314
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effect of combined spinal epidural versus epidural analgesia on fetal heart rate in laboring patients at risk for uteroplacental insufficiency

Erin Maetzolda Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Good Samaritan TriHealth Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
,
Donna S. Lambersa Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Good Samaritan TriHealth Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USACorrespondence[email protected]
,
C. Ganga Devaiahb Hatton Research Institute, Good Samaritan TriHealth Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-3975
ORCID Icon &
Mounira Hablia Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Good Samaritan TriHealth Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Pages 46-51 | Received 06 Sep 2019, Accepted 02 Jan 2020, Published online: 12 Jan 2020

References

  • Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Epidural and spinal anesthesia use during labor: 27-state reporting area, 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;59(5):1–13.
  • Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(4):319–332.
  • Lim G, Facco FL, Nathan N, et al. A review of the impact of obstetric anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(1):192–215.
  • Mardirosoff C, Dumont L, Boulvain M, et al. Fetal bradycardia due to intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic review. BJOG. 2002;109(3):274–281.
  • Abrão KC, Francisco RP, Miyadahira S, et al. Elevation of uterine basal tone and fetal heart rate abnormalities after labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(1):41–47.
  • Patel NP, El-Wahab N, Fernando R, et al. Fetal effects of combined spinal-epidural vs epidural labour analgesia: a prospective, randomised double-blind study. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(5):458–467.
  • Skupski DW, Abramovitz S, Samuels J, et al. Adverse effects of combined spinal-epidural versus traditional epidural analgesia during labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):242–245.
  • Miro M, Guasch E, Gilsanz F. Comparison of epidural analgesia with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a retrospective study of 6497 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17(1):15–19.
  • Nakamura G, Ganem EM, Rugolo LM, et al. Effects on mother and fetus of epidural and combined spinal-epidural techniques for labor analgesia. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2009;55(4):405–409.
  • Nicolet J, Miller A, Kaufman I, et al. Maternal factors implicated in fetal bradycardia after combined spinal epidural for labour pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25(9):721–725.
  • Lo JO, Mission JF, Caughey AB. Hypertensive disease of pregnancy and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(2):124–132.
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e97–e109.
  • Lin S, Shimizu I, Suehara N, et al. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in relation to trophoblast migration into the myometrium of the placental bed. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(5):760–765.
  • Sciscione AC, Hayes EJ, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Uterine artery Doppler flow studies in obstetric practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):121–126.
  • Wright JP. Anesthetic considerations in preeclampsia-eclampsia. Anesth Analg. 1983;62(6):590–601.
  • Ankichetty SP, Chin KJ, Chan VW, et al. Regional anesthesia in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(4):435–444.
  • Guedes-Martins L, Graça H, Saraiva JP, et al. The effects of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section on uterine and umbilical arterial pulsatility indexes in normotensive and chronic hypertensive pregnant women: a prospective, longitudinal study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2014;14:291.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122–1131.
  • Olsen IE, Groveman SA, Lawson ML, et al. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010;125(2):e214–e224.
  • Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(3):661–666.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.