292
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 80-85 | Received 18 Feb 2019, Accepted 04 Jan 2020, Published online: 13 Jan 2020

References

  • Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al. Breech presentation and delivery. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al., editors. Williams obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGrawHill; 2009. p. 509–535.
  • Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):851–852.
  • Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383.
  • Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(10):946–950.
  • Hall MH, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):776.
  • Cooper GM, Lewis G, Neilson J. Confidential enquiries into maternal deaths, 1997–1999. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(3):369–372.
  • Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1089–1093.
  • Miller ES, Hahn K, Grobman WA. Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(4):789–797.
  • Thunedborg P, Fischer-Rasmussen W, Tollund L. The benefit of external cephalic version with tocolysis as a routine procedure in late pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;42(1):23–27.
  • Hanss JW. Jr. The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(6):1459–1463.
  • Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):630.e1–630.e7.
  • Cluver C, Gyte GML, Sinclair M, et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2(2):CD000184.
  • Jørgensen JS, Weile LK, Lamont RF. Preterm labor: current tocolytic options for the treatment of preterm labor. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(5):585–588.
  • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333–337.
  • Phelan JP. Antepartum fetal assessment-newer techniques. Semin Perinatol. 1988;12(1):57–65.
  • Bujold E, Boucher M, Rinfret D, et al. Sublingual nitroglycerin versus placebo as a tocolytic for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial in parous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1070–1073.
  • Andarsio F, Feng TI. External cephalic version: nitroglycerin versus terbutaline. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:161.
  • Bujold E, Marquette GP, Ferreira E, et al. Sublingual nitroglycerin versus intravenous ritodrine as tocolytic for external cephalic version: a double-blinded randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(6):1454–1457.
  • Yanny H, Johanson R, Baldwin KJ, et al. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate spray for external cephalic version. BJOG. 2000;107(4):562–564.
  • Kok M, Bais JM, van Lith JM, et al. Nifedipine as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(2, Part 1):271–276.
  • Stergiotou I, Talbot F, Yoong W. The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(8):927–929.
  • Burgos J, Eguiguren N, Quintana E, et al. Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(1):23–28.
  • Velzel J, Vlemmix F, Opmeer BC, et al. Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2017;356:i6773.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.