Is computerized cardiotocography useful in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction?

References

• Emery SP, Bahtiyar MO, Dashe JS, et al. The North American Fetal Therapy Network Consensus Statement: prenatal management of uncomplicated monochorionic gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1236–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewi L, Van Schoubroeck D, Gratacós E, et al. Monochorionic diamniotic twins: complications and management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(2):177–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewi L, Gucciardo L, Van Mieghem T, et al. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: natural history and risk stratification. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(3):121–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratacós E, Lewi L, Muñoz B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(1):28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratacós E, Deprest J. Current experience with fetoscopy and the Eurofoetus registry for fetoscopic procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;92(1):151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsky DV, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(8):719–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsky DV, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management dilemmas. Semin Fetal Neonat Med. 2010;15(6):342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend R, Khalil A. Twin pregnancy complicated by selective growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(6):485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Winden KR, Quintero RA, Kontopoulos EV, et al. Perinatal survival in cases of twin–twin transfusion syndrome complicated by selective intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(13):1549–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratacós E, Carreras E, Becker J, et al. Prevalence of neurological damage in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(2):159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inklaar MJ, van Klink JM, Stolk TT, et al. Cerebral injury in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(3):205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopriore E, Sluimers C, Pasman SA, et al. Neonatal morbidity in growth-discordant monochorionic twins: comparison between the larger and the smaller twin. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012;15(4):541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, et al. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1997;57(1):33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devane D, Lalor J. Midwives’ visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(2):133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med. 1991;19(1–2):47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardey J, Moulden M, Redman CW. A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):1095–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouskouti C, Regner K, Knabl J, et al. Cardiotocography and the evolution into computerised cardiotocography in the management of intrauterine growth restriction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(4):811–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders RJM, Ribbert LSM, Visser GHA, et al. Numeric analysis of heart rate variation in intrauterine growth-retarded fetuses: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(1):22–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anceschi MM, Ruozi-Berretta A, Piazze JJ, et al. Computerized cardiotocography in the management of intrauterine growth restriction associated with Doppler velocimetry alterations. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;86(3):365–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, Martins M, et al. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(6):969–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid–base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra V, Moulden M, Bellver J, et al. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG. 2008;115(9):1101–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda MdFY, Nomura RMY, Niigaki JI, et al. Influence of fetal acidemia on fetal heart rate analyzed by computerized cardiotocography in pregnancies with placental insufficiency. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(18):1820–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda MdFY, Nomura RMY, Niigaki JI, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in the prediction of myocardial damage in pregnancies with placental insufficiency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;190:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Kumar B, Tincello DG, et al. Computerised antenatal fetal heart rate recordings between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2001;108(8):858–862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anceschi MM, Piazze JJ, Ruozi-Berretta A, et al. Validity of short term variation (STV) in detection of fetal acidemia. J Perinat Med. 2003;31(3):231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees C, the TRUFFLE Group, Marlow N, Arabin B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):400–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et al. 2 Year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2162–2172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser GHA, Bilardo CM, Derks JB; TRUFFLE group investigators, et al. Fetal monitoring indications for delivery and 2-year outcome in 310 infants with fetal growth restriction delivered before 32 weeks’ gestation in the TRUFFLE study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(3):347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann MU, Marti M, Durrer L, et al. Placental plasticity in monochorionic twins: impact on birth weight and placental weight. Placenta. 2015;36(9):1018–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tendais I, Visser GH, Figueiredo B, et al. Fetal behavior and heart rate in twin pregnancy: a review. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16(2):619–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustico MA, Consonni D, Lanna M, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: changing patterns in umbilical artery Doppler flow and outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(3):387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar