Risk factors for failed chorionic villus sampling: results of a 4-year retrospective study

References

• Ferguson JE, Vick DJ, Hogge JS, et al. Transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a comparison of reliability, culture findings, and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):926–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iruretagoyena J, Stewart K, Trampe B, et al. A model to teach transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(1):S283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Chaar D, Manley J, LeBouthilier F, et al. Development of a high-fidelity simulator for teaching chorionic villus sampling. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(9):1178–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalousek DK, Dill FJ, Pantzar T, et al. Confined chorionic mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet. 1987;77(2):163–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvestiti F, Agrati C, Grimi B, et al. Interpreting mosaicism in chorionic villi: results of a monocentric series of 1001 mosaics in chorionic villi with follow-up amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(11):1117–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertile M. Genome-wide cell-free DNA-based prenatal testing for rare autosomal trisomies and subchromosomal abnormalities. In: Page-Christiaens L, Klein H-G, editors. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT): applied genomics in prenatal screening and diagnosis. London (UK): Academic Press; 2018. p. 97–123.
   Google Scholar
• Salsi G, Grati FR, Bellussi F, et al. Risk of fetal loss in pregnancies undergoing midtrimester amniocentesis after inconclusive chorionic villus sampling. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(3):149–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooper AJA, Faas BHW, Feuth T, et al. Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(1):17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeOliveira A, Deitz J, Young C, et al. The sooner the better: our laboratory experience with chorionic villus sampling (CVS) HLA typing prior to HSCT. Hum Immunol. 2015;76:110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawin O’Brien A, Dall’Asta A, Tapon D, et al. Gestation related karyotype, QF-PCR and CGH-array failure rates in diagnostic amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(8):708–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins TM, Sciscione AC, Wapner RJ, et al. Training in chorionic villus sampling: limited experience for US fellows. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1288–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suskin BG, Sciscione AM, Teigen N, et al. Revisiting the challenges of training maternal fetal medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):777.e1–777.e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui L, Muggli EE, Halliday JL. Population-based trends in prenatal screening and diagnosis for aneuploidy: a retrospective analysis of 38 years of state-wide data. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2016;123(1):90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larion S, Warsof SL, Romary L, et al. Association of combined first-trimester screen and noninvasive prenatal testing on diagnostic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1303–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson SJ, Hui L. National decline in invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures in association with uptake of combined first trimester and cell-free DNA aneuploidy screening. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(5):507–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt LD, Janicki MB, Prosen T, et al. Impact of noninvasive prenatal testing in regionally dispersed medical centers in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):368.e1–368.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wax JR, Cartin A, Chard R, et al. Noninvasive prenatal testing: impact on genetic counseling, invasive prenatal diagnosis, and trisomy 21 detection. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manegold-Brauer G, Kang Bellin A, Hahn S, et al. A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan YM, Leung WC, Chan WP, et al. Women’s uptake of non-invasive DNA testing following a high-risk screening test for trisomy 21 within a publicly funded healthcare system: findings from a retrospective review. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(4):342–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui L, Tabor A, Walker SP, et al. How to safeguard competency and training in invasive prenatal diagnosis: “the elephant in the room. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilby MD. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus Sampling in Scotland: an audit of techniques and outcomes of all procedures over one year in Scotland. National Health Service Scotland; 2010. Available from: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/reproductive,_maternal_child/programme_resources/amniocentesis_chorionic_villus.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Roth P, Bernard J-P, Salomon LJ, et al. Prélèvements foetaux: à propos de quelques situations problématiques. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013;41(7–8):446–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai PJ, Loichinger M, Zalud I. Obesity and the challenges of ultrasound fetal abnormality diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(3):320–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauman K, Timothy H, Elizabeth D, et al. 133: Effect of needle size on the performance of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(Suppl 80):S80.
   Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Navaratnam K, Mujezinovic F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD003252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stergiotou I, Borobio V, Bennasar M, et al. Transcervical chorionic villus sampling: a practical guide. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1244–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonazzi G, Curti A, Farina A, et al. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(4):365.e1–365.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Omidakhsh N, Hutcheon J, et al. 142: Technical factors contributing to procedure-related loss and complication rates following transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1Suppl 85):S85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar