Selective intrauterine growth restriction (SIUGR) type II: proposed subclassification to guide surgical management

References

• Gratacos E, Lewi L, Munoz B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(1):28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennasar M, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(6):376–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buca D, Pagani G, Rizzo G, et al. Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective intrauterine growth restriction according to umbilical artery Doppler flow pattern of smaller twin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):559–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsky DV, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management dilemmas. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15(6):342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii K, Murakoshi T, Takahashi Y, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;26(3):157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero RA, Bornick PW, Morales WJ, et al. Selective photocoagulation of communicating vessels in the treatment of monochorionic twins with selective growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(3):689–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SS, Zamora J, Khan KS, et al. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG. 2006;113(9):992–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratacos E, Carreras E, Becker J, et al. Prevalence of neurological damage in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(2):159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii K, Wada S, Takano M, et al. Survival rate without brain abnormalities on postnatal ultrasonography among monochorionic twins after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for selective intrauterine growth restriction with concomitant oligohydramnios. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(1):21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeva G, Bower S, Orosz L, et al. Endoscopic placental laser coagulation in monochorionic diamniotic twins with type ii selective fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(2):86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalouhi GE, Marangoni MA, Quibel T, et al. Active management of selective intrauterine growth restriction with abnormal Doppler in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(2):109–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng R, Xie HN, Lin MF, et al. Clinical outcomes after selective fetal reduction of complicated monochorionic twins with radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord coagulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2016;81(6):552–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra-Cordero M, Bennasar M, Martinez JM, et al. Cord occlusion in monochorionic twins with early selective intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal umbilical artery doppler: a consecutive series of 90 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;39(3):186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero R, Kontopoulos E, Williams ME, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction (SIUGR) type II: laser versus expectant management. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1638902.
   Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero RA, Bornick PW, Allen MH, et al. Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome in women with an anterior placenta. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(3):477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero RA, Chmait RH, Bornick PW, et al. Trocar-assisted selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels: a technique for the laser treatment of patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome with inaccessible anterior placentas. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(4):330–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Sattar M, Chon AH, Llanes A, et al. Comparison of umbilical cord occlusion methods: radiofrequency ablation versus laser photocoagulation. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(2):110–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JR, Conturie CL, Ouzounian JG, et al. Umbilical cord occlusion via laser coagulation in monochorionic multifetal gestations before and after 20 weeks of gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42(1):9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend R, D'Antonio F, Sileo FG, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):36–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch A, Favre R, Viville B, et al. Expectant management and laser photocoagulation in isolated selective intra-uterine growth restriction: a single-center series. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(10):731–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ghazali W, Chita SK, Chapman MG, et al. Evidence of redistribution of cardiac output in asymmetrical growth retardation. BJOG.1989;96(6):697–704.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas S, Nicolaides KH, Bower S, et al. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. BJOG. 1990;97(9):797–803.
   Google Scholar
• Mari G, Hanif F, Kruger M, Cosmi E, et al. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: a new Doppler parameter in the assessment of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(3):310–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiserud T. The ductus venosus. Semin Perinatol. 2001;25(1):11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan C, Kalafat E, Binder J, et al. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):200–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyadahira MY, Brizot ML, Carvalho MHB, et al. Type II and III selective fetal growth restriction: perinatal outcomes of expectant management and laser ablation of placental vessels. Clinics. 2018;73:e210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmait RH, Kontopoulos EV, Korst LM, et al. Stage-based outcomes of 682 consecutive cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery: the USFetus experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:393 e1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peeters SH, Akkermans J, Westra M, et al. Identification of essential steps in laser procedure for twin-twin transfusion syndrome using the Delphi methodology: SILICONE study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(4):439–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visentin S, Macchi V, Grumolato F, et al. Expectant management in type II selective intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal cord insertion in monochorionic twins. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D, Fan D, Wu S, et al. Role of velamentous cord insertion in monochorionic twin pregnancies: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1551350.
   Google Scholar
• Gou C, Li M, Zhang X, et al. Placental characteristics in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction assessed by gradient angiography and three-dimensional reconstruction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(21):2590–2595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar