Modeling Pulsatility Index nomograms from different maternal and fetal vessels by quantile regression at 24–40 weeks of gestation: a prospective cross-sectional study

References

• Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, et al. GRIT study group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364:513–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees C, , Marlow N, Arabin B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):400–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CK, Smith GC, Papageorghiou AT, et al. An integrated model for the prediction of preeclampsia using maternal factors and uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in unselected low-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(2):429–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Martinez R, Savchev S, Cruz-Lemini M, et al. Clinical utility of third-trimester uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of brain hemodynamic deterioration and adverse perinatal outcome in small for gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Martınez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade , et al. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;11:618–626.
   Google Scholar
• Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(3):313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:38–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V, et al. Role of Doppler ultrasound at time of diagnosis of late‐onset fetal growth restriction in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20406
   Google Scholar
• DeVore GR. The importance of the CPR in the evaluation of fetal well‐being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):5–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L, Sherrell H, Kumar S. Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta. 2017;54:68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros D, Ruiz‐Martinez S, Staines‐Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):454–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduini D, Rizzo G. Normal values of pulsatility index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med. 1990;18(3):165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellek S, Lackner KJ, Jennen-Steinmetz C, et al. Determination of reference limits: statistical concepts and tools for sample size calculation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(12):1685–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Pere A, Koenker R, et al. Quantile regression methods for reference growth charts. Stat Med. 2006;25(8):1369–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Basset G. Regression quantiles. Econometrica. 1978;46(1):33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R. Quantreg: an R package for quantile regression and related methods. The Comprehensive R Archive Network website; 2004 [cited 2020 Mar 1]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R version 2.13.1. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing website; 2011 [cited 2020 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.r-project.org/foundation/
   Google Scholar
• Medina Castro N, Figueroa DH, Guzmán HM, et al. Normal reference values of the pulsatility index from the uterine and umbilical arteries during pregnancy. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006;74(10):509–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):128–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Fetal Medicine Foundation. [cited 2020 Mar 1]. Available from: https://fetalmedicine.org/research/doppler
   Google Scholar
• Krampl ER, Espinoza‐Dorado J, Lees CC, et al. Maternal uterine artery Doppler studies at high altitude and sea level. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):578–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra‐Cordero M, Lees C, Missfelder‐Lobos H, et al. C. Fetal arterial and venous Doppler pulsatility index and time averaged velocity ranges. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27(13):1251–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina Castro N, Figueroa DH, Hernández AE. Normal reference values of the pulsatility index and peak systolic velocity in the fetal middle cerebral artery during normal pregnancy. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006;74(7):376–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(2):124–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(3):287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil A, Morales-Rosello J, Khan N, et al. Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):606.e1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Gallo DM, et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(1):82–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Basuki TR, et al. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S774–S782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris RK, Say R, Robson SC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of middle cerebral artery Doppler to predict perinatal wellbeing. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(2):141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stampalija T, Arabin B, Wolf H, et al. Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 521.e1–13. Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 522–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(4):CD001450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Antonio F, Patel D, Chandrasekharan N, et al. Role of cerebroplacental ratio for fetal assessment in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):196–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves CR. Antepartum fetal surveillance and timing of delivery in the pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(4):1007–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Doppler reference values of the fetal vertebral and middle cerebral arteries, at 19–41 weeks gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(3):338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt K, Odibo L, Nwabuobi C, et al. The value of introducing cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) versus umbilical artery (UA) Doppler alone for the prediction of neonatal small for gestational age (SGA) and short-term adverse outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1640206
   Google Scholar
• Flatley C, Kumar S. Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(14):2380–2386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar