References
- Unterscheider J, Mcmenamin M, Cullinane F. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157(2):141–144.
- Vousden N, Cargill Z, Briley A, et al. Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;16(3):199–205.
- Nooh AM, Abdeldayem HM, Ben-Affan O. Reverse breech extraction versus the standard approach of pushing the impacted fetal head up through the vagina in caesarean section for obstructed labour: a randomised controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(4):459–463.
- Asıcıoglu O, Güngördük K, Yildirim G, et al. Second-stage vs first-stage caesarean delivery: comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(7):598–604.
- Rabiu KA, Adewunmi AA, Akinola OI, et al. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2011;18(3):165–171.
- Seal SL, Dey A, Barman SC, et al. Does elevating the fetal head prior to delivery using a fetal pillow reduce maternal and fetal complications in a full dilatation caesarean section? A prospective study with historical controls. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(3):241–244.
- Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, et al. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(4):375–378.
- Allen VM, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. BJOG: An Int J O&G. 2005;112(7):986–990.
- Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z, et al. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121(1):24–26.
- Jeve YB, Navti OB, Konje JC. Authors’ reply re: comparison of techniques used to deliver a deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123(13):2226–2227.
- Landesman R, Graber EA. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(6):707–710.
- Fong YF, Arulkumaran S. Breech extraction - an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1997;56(2):183–184.
- Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(3):661–666.
- Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, et al. Birthweight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(5):311–314.
- Berhan Y, Berhan A. A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(2):99–105.
- Veisi F, Zangeneh M, Malekkhosravi S, et al. Comparison of “push” and “pull” methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;118(1):4–6.
- Schwake D, Petchenkin L, Younis JS. Reverse breech extraction in cases of second stage caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(6):548–551.
- Chopra S, Bagga R, Keepanasseril A, et al. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(10):1163–1166.
- Bastani P, Pourabolghase S, Abbasalizadeh F, et al. Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(1):1–3.