288
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cervical-length as a screening for spontaneous preterm birth in uncomplicated twins: one vs. serial measurements

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 4097-4103 | Received 16 Apr 2020, Accepted 03 Nov 2020, Published online: 24 Nov 2020

References

  • Iams JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1861.
  • Kindinger LM, Poon LC, Cacciatore S, et al. The effect of gestational age at cervical length measurements in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: an individual patient level meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;123(6):877–884.
  • United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2017, Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, United Nations Children’s Fund, New York, 2017.
  • Melamed N, Pittini A, Hiersch L, et al. Do serial measurements of cervical length improve the prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):616.e1–616.e14.
  • Gyamfi C, Lerner V, Holzman I, et al. Routine cervical length in twins and perinatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24(1):65–69.
  • Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, et al. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):305–315.
  • Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):e131.
  • Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247–263.
  • Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, El-Refaie W, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(3):303–314.
  • Berghella V, Saccone G. Twins with short cervix: hope ahead. BJOG. 2017;124(8):1174.
  • Kilby MD. Bricker L on behalf of the royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists. management of monochorionic twin pregnancy. BJOG. 2016; 124:e1–e45.
  • Vayssière C, Benoist G, Blondel B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):12–17.
  • FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(3):330–337.
  • [cited 2020 Jan 23]. Available from: https://medicinafetalbarcelona.org/protocolos/es/patologia-fetal/gestacion-multiple.html.
  • [cited 2020 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.fasgo.org.ar/archivos/consensos/embgemelar.pdf.
  • Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572.
  • Sonek J, Shellhaas C. Cervical sonography: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11(1):71–78.
  • To MS, Skentou C, Chan C, et al. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-week scan: standardizing techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(3):217–219.
  • Pagani G, Stagnati V, Fichera A, et al. Cervical length at mid gestation for the screening of preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48(1):56–60.
  • Moroz LA, Brock CO, Govindappagari S, et al. Association between change in cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):159.e1–159.e7.
  • Pasquini L, Sisti G, Nasioudis D, et al. Ability of cervical length to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies using the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and an a priori cut-off value. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(5):562–565.
  • Hofmeister C, Brizot ML, Liao A, et al. Two-stage transvaginal cervical length screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:479–484.
  • Hester AE, Ankumah NE, Chauhan SP, et al. Twin transvaginal cervical length at 16–20 weeks and prediction of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;8:1–5.
  • Levêque C, Vayssière C, Favre R, et al. Research Group in Obstetrics and Gynecology (GROG). Cervical length in asymptomatic twin pregnancies: prospective multicenter comparison of predictive indicators. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(1):37–40.
  • Guzman ER, Walters C, O’Reilly-Green C, et al. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(5):1103–1107.
  • Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin pregnancies: a French prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1596–1604.
  • Brock CO, Moroz LA, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Cervical length as a predictor of preterm delivery in an unselected cohort of women with twin pregnancies. Amer J Perinatol. 2019;36(12):1288–1294.
  • Fox NS, Rebarber A, Roman AS, et al. Association between second-trimester cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(12):1733–1739.
  • Gibson JL, Macara LM, Owen P, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observation study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):561–566.
  • Yang JH, Kuhlman K, Daly S, et al. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester sonography in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;14:2988–2291.
  • El-Gharib MN, Albehoty SB. Transvaginal cervical length measurement at 22- to 26-week pregnancy in prediction of preterm births in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(6):729–732.
  • Weitzner O, Yagur Y, Biron-Shental T, et al. Twin pregnancies: can sonographic measurements and changes in cervical length during pregnancy predict preterm birth? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020:1–4. doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1770218
  • Skentou C, Souka AP, To MS, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(1):7–10.
  • Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Mourad L, Serour GI, et al. Ultrasound cervical measurement and prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in ICSI pregnancies: a prospective controlled study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(2):296–300.
  • Bergh E, Rebarber A, Oppal S, et al. The association between maternal biomarkers and pathways to preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(5):504–508.
  • Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–35.
  • Sisti G. Cervical length cut-off in twin pregnancy and preterm labor risk assessment algorithm: call for action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):233–234.
  • Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):789–801.
  • Medley N, Poljak B, Mammarella S, et al. Clinical guidelines for prevention and management of preterm birth: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(11):1361–1369.
  • Dodd JM, Grivell RM, OBrien CM, et al. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10(10):CD012024.
  • Qureshey EJ, Quiñones JN, Rochon M, et al. Comparison of management options for twin pregnancies with cervical shortening. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1–7. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1706477
  • Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic J, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113(Suppl. 3):17–42.
  • Vink J, Mourad M. The pathophysiology of human premature cervical remodeling resulting in spontaneous preterm birth: where are we now? Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(7):427–437.
  • Jeve YB, Potdar N, Opoku A, et al. Donor oocyte conception and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123(9):1471–1480.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.