Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 25
Submit an article Journal homepage
118
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The accuracy and influencing factors for preference of self-sampling in group B streptococcus screening: a cross-sectional study

Ruirui Chena Department of Maternal Health, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Lijuan Wub Maternal–Fetal Medicine Institute, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China;c Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Fenglan Mad Department of Obstetrics, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Xuri Chend Department of Obstetrics, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
&
Yuanfang Zhub Maternal–Fetal Medicine Institute, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China;d Department of Obstetrics, Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
Pages 5194-5198 | Received 29 Sep 2020, Accepted 10 Jan 2021, Published online: 22 Feb 2021

References

  • Kwatra G, Cunnington MC, Merrall E, et al. Prevalence of maternal colonisation with group B streptococcus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(9):1076–1084.
  • Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease–revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(Rr-10):1–36.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion no.485: prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):1019–1027.
  • Price D, Shaw E, Howard M, et al. Self-sampling for group B streptococcus in women 35 to 37 weeks pregnant is accurate and acceptable: a randomized cross-over trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28(12):1083–1088.
  • Hicks P, Diaz-Perez MJ. Patient self-collection of group B streptococcal specimens during pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(2):136–140.
  • Molnar P, Biringer A, McGeer A, et al. Can pregnant women obtain their own specimens for group B streptococcus? A comparison of maternal versus physician screening. The Mount Sinai GBS Screening Group. Fam Pract. 1997;14(5):403–406.
  • Lee WL, Yeh CC, Wang PH. Did self-sampling improve the adherence to group B streptococci screening in pregnant women? J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79(2):51–53.
  • Ko JK, Yung SS, Seto MT, Lee CP. A questionnaire study on the acceptability of self-sampling versus screening by clinicians for Group B Streptococcus. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79(2):83–87.
  • Wu LJ, Wang FL, Zou JH, et al. [Analysis of screening strategy of group B streptococcus in the third trimester and its influence on pregnancy outcome]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019;54(3):154–159.
  • Sample size calculator: two parallel-sample proportions. Available from: https://www2.ccrb.cuhk.edu.hk/stat/proportion/tspp_equality.htm.
  • Arya A, Cryan B, O'Sullivan K, et al. Self-collected versus health professional-collected genital swabs to identify the prevalence of group B Streptococcus: a comparison of patient preference and efficacy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(1):43–45.
  • Torok PG, Dunn JP. Self-collection of antepartum anogenital group B Streptococcus cultures. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13(2):107–110.
  • Belinson JL, Wang G, Qu X, et al. The development and evaluation of a community based model for cervical cancer screening based on self-sampling. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):636–642.
  • Kwatra G, Adrian PV, Shiri T, et al. Serotype-specific acquisition and loss of group B Streptococcus recto-vaginal colonization in late pregnancy. PLOS One. 2014;9(6):e98778.
  • Mirsky R, Carpenter DM, Postlethwaite DA, et al. Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term? J Matern-Fetal Neo M. 2020; 33(22):3791–3797.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.