Large-for-gestational-age or macrosomia as a classifier for risk of adverse perinatal outcome: a retrospective cross-sectional study

References

• Ye J, Zhang L, Chen Y, et al. Searching for the definition of macrosomia through an outcome-based approach. PLOS One. 2014;9(6):e100192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice B, No 1. Fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;128(5):e195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo Júnior E, Peixoto AB, Zamarian ACP, et al. Macrosomia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:83–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beta J, Khan N, Khalil A, et al. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(3):319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter EB, Stockburger J, Tuuli MG, et al. Large-for-gestational age and stillbirth: is there a role for antenatal testing? Ultrasound in. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(3):334–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski R, Hansen NI, Willinger M, et al. Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case–control study. PLOS Med. 2014;11(4):e1001633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen P, Keyes KM, Susser E, et al. High birth weight and perinatal mortality among siblings: a register based study in Norway, 1967–2011. PLOS One. 2017;12(2):e0172891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu S, An X, Liang F, et al. Risk factors and long-term health consequences of macrosomia: a prospective study in Jiangsu Province. J Biomed Res. 2012;26(4):235–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang D, Hong Y, Zhu L, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of macrosomia in China: a multicentric survey based on birth data. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(5):623–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua X-G, Jiang W, Hu R, et al. Large for gestational age and macrosomia in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;33:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen J. Diabetes and pregnancy; blood sugar of newborn infants during fasting and glucose administration. Ugeskr Laeger. 1952;114(21):685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryst Ł, Bilińska I. Secular changes in birth weights and women’s body size in Kraków And Poznań (Poland) during the last century. J Biosoc Sci. 2017;49(3):380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh RE, Berild JD, Sterrantino AF, et al. Birth weight trends in England and Wales (1986–2012): babies are getting heavier. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(3):F264–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer MS, Morin I, Yang H, et al. Why are babies getting bigger? Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. J Pediatr. 2002;141(4):538–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue SMA, Kleinman KP, Gillman MW, et al. Trends in birth weight and gestational length among singleton term births in the United States: 1990–2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(2 Pt 1):357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salihu HM, Dongarwar D, King LM, et al. Trends in the incidence of fetal macrosomia and its phenotypes in the United States, 1971–2017. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(2):415–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agay-Shay K, Rudolf M, Rubin L, et al. Trends in fetal growth between 2000 to 2014 in singleton live births from Israel. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim H-E, Song IG, Chung S-H, et al. Trends in birth weight and the incidence of low birth weight and advanced maternal age in Korea between 1993 and 2016. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(4):e34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Zhang J, Lu X, et al. Secular trends of macrosomia in southeast China, 1994–2005. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):e18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROCAT. EUROCAT Guide 1.4: instruction for the registration of congenital anomalies. EUROCAT Central Registry, University of Ulster [Internet]; 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 6]. Available from: https://eu-rd-platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Full_Guide_1_4_version_28_DEC2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kajdy A, Modzelewski J, Filipecka-Tyczka D, et al. Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1–8. [cited 2020 Jun 6]. Available from: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1676412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araszkiewicz A, Bandurska-Stankiewicz E, Budzyński A, et al. Guidelines on the management of diabetic patients. A position of Diabetes Poland. Clin Diabetol. 2020;9(1):1–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects [Internet]; 2012 [cited 2020 Jul 5]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200209.
   Google Scholar
• Enders CK. Applied missing data analysis. Methodology in the social sciences. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2010. p. 377.
   Google Scholar
• Doty MS, Chen H-Y, Sibai BM, et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with early term delivery of large-for-gestational-age but nonmacrosomic neonates. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(6):1160–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajdy A, Modzelewski J, Herman K, et al. Growth charts and prediction of abnormal growth — what is known, what is not known and what is misunderstood. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(12):717–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agbozo F, Abubakari A, Der J, et al. Prevalence of low birth weight, macrosomia and stillbirth and their relationship to associated maternal risk factors in Hohoe Municipality, Ghana. Midwifery. 2016;40:200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Decker A, Platt RW, et al. How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):517.e1–e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood S, Tang S. Stillbirth and large for gestational age at birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;33(12):1974–1979. 10.1080/14767058.2018.1534229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González González NL, Plasencia W, González Dávila E, et al. The effect of customized growth charts on the identification of large for gestational age newborns. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(1):62–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin JC, Speer PD, Simhan HN. A customized standard of large size for gestational age to predict intrapartum morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):499.e1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaarda LA, Albert PS, Mumford SL, et al. Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):63.e1–63.e11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3872267/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beta J, Khan N, Fiolna M, et al. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(3):319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen A, Chauhan SP. Shoulder dystocia: definitions and incidence. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(4):184–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Bulletin No 1. Shoulder dystocia. Obstetr Gynecol. 2017;129(5):e123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira MC, Relph S, Persson M, et al. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: a Swedish population-based cohort study. PLOS Med. 2019;16(9):e1002902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasupathy D, McCowan LME, Poston L, et al. Perinatal outcomes in large infants using customised birthweight centiles and conventional measures of high birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(6):543–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar