Action learning and constructivist grounded theory: powerfully overlapping fields of practice

References

• Ainley, P. 2000. “Teaching in a Learning Society, the Acquisition of Professional Skills.” Paper presented at the ESRC Teaching and Learning First Programme conference at the University of Leicester, England, November. http://www.tlrp.org/acadpub/Ainley2000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Backman, K., and H. Kyngäs. 1999. “Challenges of the Grounded Theory Approach to a Novice Researcher.” Nursing and Health Sciences 1 (3): 147–153. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00019.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baskerville, R., and J. Pries-Heje. 1999. “Grounded Action Research: A Method for Understanding IT in Practice.” Accounting Management and Information Technologies 9: 1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8022(98)00017-4
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourner, T., and P. Simpson. 2005. “Practitioner-Centred Research and the Ph.D.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 2 (2): 133–151. doi: 10.1080/14767330500206789
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., and K. Charmaz, eds. 2010. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Paperback ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory a Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K 2009. “Shifting the Grounds: Constructivist Grounded Theory Methods.” In Developing Grounded Theory the Second Generation, edited by J. Morse, 127–193. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D 2013. “Action Learning Research? Reflections from the Colloquium at the Third International Conference on Action Learning.” Action Learning Research and Practice 10 (1): 54–57. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2012.759459
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and M. Pedler. 2006. “Action Learning Dissertations: Structure, Supervision and Examination.” Action Learning Research and Practice 3 (2): 127–139. doi: 10.1080/14767330600885797
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S 2002. Fieldwork in Educational Settings: Methods, Pitfalls and Perspectives. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonstone, J 2011. “Action Learning and Organisation Development: Overlapping Fields of Practice.” Action Learning Research and Practice 8 (2): 93–102. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2011.581017
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S 2009. “Following the Action in Action Learning: Towards Ethnomethodological Studies of (Critical) Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 5–16. doi: 10.1080/14767330902731251
   Google Scholar
• Learmonth, A., and M. Pedler. 2004. “Auto Action Learning: A Tool for Policy Change. Building Capacity Across the Developing Regional System to Improve Health in the North East of England.” Health Policy 68: 169–181. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, K 2001. Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, B. 1994. “Teachers’ Professional Development: Critical Colleagueship and the Role of Professional Communities.” In The Future of Education: Perspectives on National Standards in Education, edited by N. Cobb, 175–204. New York: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, M. n.d. “Embodied Research and Grounded Theory.” http://www.wales.ac.uk/en/featuredcontent/articles/staffarticles/EmbodiedResearchandGroundedTheory.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, J., and M. Zukas. 2001. “Bridging Pedagogic Gaps: Conceptual Discontinuities in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (1): 33–42. doi: 10.1080/13562510020029581
   Google Scholar
• Males, Lorraine. 2009. “Confronting Practice: Critical Colleagueship in a Mathematics Teacher Study Group.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Atlanta, GA. http://michiganstate.academia.edu/LorraineMales/Papers/412689/Confronting_Practice_Critical_Colleagueship_In_a_Mathematics_Teacher_Study_Group
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., and G. B. Rossman. 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, I., and L. Beaty. 2001. Action Learning – a Guide for Professional, Management and Educational Development. Rev. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, I., and A. Brockbank. 2004. The Action Learning Handbook. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J 1981. “A Critical Theory of Adult Learning and Education.” Adult Education 32 (1): 3–24. doi: 10.1177/074171368103200101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. ed. 2009a. Developing Grounded Theory the Second Generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J 2009b. “Tussles, Tensions, and Resolutions.” In Developing Grounded Theory the Second Generation, edited by J. Morse, 13–23. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J., A. Clarke, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, J. Corbin, and P. Stern. 2009. “Grounded Theories: on Solid Ground.” In Developing Grounded Theory the Second Generation, edited by J. Morse, 236–250. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. 1985. “Understanding Understanding.” American Journal of Education 93 (2): 201–239. doi: 10.1086/443791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., J. Burgoyne, and C. Brook. 2005. “What Has Action Learning Learned to Become?” Action Learning: Research and Practice 2 (1): 49–68. doi: 10.1080/14767330500041251
   Google Scholar
• Plauborg, H 2009. “Opportunities and Limitations for Learning within Teachers’ Collaboration in Teams: Perspectives from Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 25–34. doi: 10.1080/14767330902731293
   Google Scholar
• Rand, J. 2011. “Dimensions of Knowing: A Constructivist Exploration of a Conceptual Model in a Real Context.” EdD diss., University of Sheffield
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C., and D. Coghlan. 2010. “Introduction to Accounts of Practice. Facing the Challenges Within.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (1): 73 doi: 10.1080/14767330903576994
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C., and K. Trehan. 2004. “Reflections on Working with Critical Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (2): 149–163. doi: 10.1080/1476733042000264128
   Google Scholar
• Seldén, L. 2005. “On Grounded Theory – with Some Malice.” Journal of Documentation 61 (1): 114–129. doi: 10.1108/00220410510578041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannak, R., and F. Aldhmour. 2009. “Grounded Theory as a Methodology for Theory Generation in Information Systems Research.” European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences 15: 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sikes, P., and A. Potts eds. 2008. Researching Education from the Inside. Investigations from Within. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, P., and T. Bourner. 2007. “What Action Learning Is Not in the Twenty-First Century.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 4 (2): 173–187. doi: 10.1080/14767330701592797
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P 2009. “In the Beginning Glaser and Strauss Created Grounded Theory.” In Developing Grounded Theory the Second Generation, edited by J. Morse, 24–34. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and D. James. 2006. “Reinventing Grounded Theory: Some Questions about Theory, Ground and Discovery.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (6): 767–795. doi: 10.1080/01411920600989412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D., and F. Myrick. 2006. “Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (4): 547–559. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, O. 2010. “Account of Practice. From Practise to Practice: Action Learning to Support Transforming Derby.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (3): 287–295. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2010.518375
   Google Scholar