Crying Hegel in Art History

References

• Ackerman, J. 1962. ‘A Theory of Style.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20: 227–237. doi: 10.2307/427321
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. 1966. ‘Accident and the Necessity of Art.’ In Toward a Psychology of Art, 162–180. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology for the Creative Eye. New Version. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. New York: Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Brereton, D. 2006. ‘Critical Realism in Ethnology.’ In Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Birx, 601–613. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Britsch, G. 1926. Theorie der bildenden Kunst, edited by Egon Kornmann. Munich: Bruckmann.
   Google Scholar
• Callinicos, A. 1995. Theories and Narratives: Reflections on the Philosophy of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 1978. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W. ‘What is Post-Formalism? (Or, Das Sehen an sich hat seine Kunstgeschichte).’ nonsite 3 (2012). http://nonsite.org.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2005. ‘A Politics of Avoidance: The Limits of Weak Ontology.’ The Hedgehog Review 7: 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2009. ‘Politics without Politics.’ Parallax 15: 20–36. doi: 10.1080/13534640902982579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, D. 1993. ‘Renaturalizing Aesthetics.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51: 351–61. doi: 10.2307/431508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2012. ‘The Emergence of Culture.’ Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50: 351–63.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. 2010. Chinese Landscape Painting as Western Art History. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
   Google Scholar
• Foster, H. 1985. “The Primitive Unconscious in Modern Art.” October 34: 58–70. doi: 10.2307/778488
   Google Scholar
• Frey, D. 1949. Grundlegung zu einer vergleichenden Kunstwissenschaft. Raum und Zeit in der Kunst der afrikanisch eurasischen Hochkulturen. Vienna: Friedrich Rohrer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gaiger, J. 2011. ‘Hegel's Contested Legacy: Rethinking the Relation Between Art History and Philosophy.’ Art Bulletin 93: 178–194. doi: 10.1080/00043079.2011.10786003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galan, F. W. 1985. Historic Structures: The Prague School Project 1928–1946. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geyl, P., with A. Toynbee and P. Sorokin. 1949. The Pattern of the Past: Can We Determine It? Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. 1960. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. 1965. ‘Style.’ In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by D.L. Sills, 352–361. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. 1996. ‘Response from E. H. Gombrich.’ In Gombrich on Art and Psychology, edited by R. Woodfield, 258–261. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hostettler, N. 2004. ‘The Dialectics of Realist Theory and the Eurocentric Problematic of Modern Discourse.’ In Realism, Discourse and Deconstruction, edited by J. Joseph and J. Roberts, 180–197. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. and Y. Tynjanov. [1928] 1980. ‘Problems in the Study of Literature and Language.’ Poetics Today 2: 29–31. doi: 10.2307/1772349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Karlholm, D. 1994. ‘Gombrich and Cultural History.’ Nordisk Estetisk Tidskrift 12: 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W. 1996. ‘The Hegel Myth and Its Method.’ In The Hegel Myths and Legends, edited by Jon Stewart, 82–103. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. 1999. ‘The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children.’ Cognition 70: 241–272. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00010-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. 2003. ‘Karl Marx and Historical Sociology.’ In The Handbook of Historical Sociology, edited by G. Delanty and E. Isin, 11–26. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lützeler, H. 1975. Kunsterfahrung und Kunstwissenschaft systematische und Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Darstellung und Dokumentation des Umgangs mit der bildenden Kunst. Freiburg : K. Alber.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. 1984. ‘Some Forms and Uses of Comparative History.’ In In his Philosophy, History and the Sciences: Critical Essays, 134–154. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. 1987. Purpose and Necessity in Social Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manicas, P. 2006. A Realist Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1861] 1973. Grundrisse. Trans. M. Nicolaus. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Monod, J. 1971. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, T. 1963. Evolution in the Arts and Other Theories of Cultural History. Cleveland: Cleveland Museum of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R. 1969. Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pächt, O. [1977] 1999. The Practice of Art History: Reflections on Method. Trans. D. Britt. New York: Harvey Miller.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. 1990. How Holocausts Happen: The United States in Central America. Philadelphia: Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Riegl, A. 1901. Die Spätrömische Kunstindustrie nach der Funden in Österreich-Ungarn. Vienna: K. K. Hof- und Staatsdrückeri.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. 2008. ‘The Horror of Ethnocentrism.’ History and Theory 47: 261–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. 1990. Social Evolutionism: A Critical History. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. 2003. ‘Review of Robert L. Carneiro.’ The Muse of History and the Science of Culture, Social Evolution & History 2: 238–246.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. 2007. Evolutionism and its Critics: Deconstructing and Reconstructing an Evolutionary Interpretation of Human Society. Boulder: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer-Simmern, H. 1948. The Unfolding of Artistic Activity. Berkeley and California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schapiro, M. 1953. ‘Style.’ In Anthropology Today, edited by A. L. Kroeber, 187–312. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. 2004. ‘Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and ‘Small N's’ in Sociology.’ Sociological Theory 22: 371–400. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. 2006. ‘Return to Empire: The New U.S. Imperialism in Comparative Historical Perspective.’ Sociological Theory 23: 339–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00258.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, D. 2003. Real Spaces. World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism. London: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Teja Bach, F. ‘The Modality of Spatial Categories.’ In Is Art History Global? edited by J. Elkins, 73–78. New York and London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. 2007. Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. ed. 2004. Heinz Werner and Developmental Science. New York: Kluwer Scientific/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2007. ‘Avatars of the Collective: A Realist Theory of Collective Subjectivities.’ Sociological Theory 25: 295–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00311.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstegen, I. 2004. ‘Arnheim and Gombrich in Social Scientific Perspective.’ Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34: 91–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstegen, I. 2012. ‘When Are We Speculating on History? A Mandelbaumian Theory.’ Journal of the Philosophy of History 6: 60–83. doi: 10.1163/187226312X625609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, H. 1948. Comparative Psychology of Mental Development. New York: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, H. and B. Kaplan. 1956. ‘The Developmental Approach to Cognition: Its Relevance to the Psychological Interpretation of Anthropological and Ethnolinguistic Data.’ American Anthropologist 58: 866–880. doi: 10.1525/aa.1956.58.5.02a00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wölfflin, H. [1915] 1932. The Principles of Art History. London: G. Bell and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O., A. Levine and E. Sober. 1992. ‘Historical Trajectories.’ In Reconstructing Marxism: Essays on Explanation and the Theory of History, 61–88. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar