Meta-theory as a uniting framework for economics and global political economy

References

• Arestis, Philip, Andrew Brown, and Malcolm Sawyer. 2002. “Critical Realism and the Political Economy of the Euro.” Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 353, September 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Arnsperger, Christian, and Yanis Varoufakis. 2006. “What Is Neoclassical Economics? The Three Axioms Responsible for its Theoretical Oeuvre, Practical Irrelevance and, Thus, Discursive Power.” Post-Autistic Economics Review 38: 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caiani, Alessandro, Antoine Godin, Eugenio Caverzasi, Mauro Gallegati, Stephen Kinsella, and Joseph Stiglitz. 2016. “Agent Based-stock Flow Consistent Macroeconomics: Towards a Benchmark Model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 69: 375–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Benjamin. 2007a. “The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPE so Different?” Review of International Political Economy 14 (2): 197–219. doi: 10.1080/09692290701288277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Benjamin. 2007b. “The Transatlantic Divide: A Rejoinder.” Review of International Political Economy 15 (1): 30–34. doi: 10.1080/09692290701751266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Benjamin. 2008. International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Benjamin. 2009. “Striking a Nerve.” Review of International Political Economy 16 (1): 136–143. doi: 10.1080/09692290802524166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Paul. 2003. “Is “Mathematical Science” an Oxymoron When Used to Describe Economics?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 25 (4): 527–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grauwe, Paul. 2012. “The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone.” Australian Economic Review 45 (3): 255–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2012.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila. 2003. “Understanding the Relationship Between Mathematics and Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 25 (4): 547–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliassen, Roman, Jostein Lohr Hauge, and Ivan Rajic. 2015. “Fit for a Fix: Why Economics Curriculum Needs a Pluralist Revamp.” Paper presented at the Cambridge Realist Workshop, Cambridge, UK, 2 November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, Roger. 2017. “Post Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Theory.” NBER Working Paper No. 23109, January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Ben. 2015. “Neoclassical Economics: An Elephant is not a Chimera but is a Chimera Real?” In What is Neoclassical Economics? Debating the Origins, Meaning and Significance, edited by Jamie Morgan, 180–189. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Irving. 1932. Booms and Depressions. New York: Adelphi Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Irving. 1933. “The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions.” Econometrica 1 (4): 337–357. doi: 10.2307/1907327
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, John. 1937. “Mr. Keynes and the “Classics”; A Suggested Interpretation.” Econometrica 5 (2): 147–159. doi: 10.2307/1907242
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, Richard, and Matthew Watson. 2007. “All at Sea in a Barbed Wire Canoe: Professor Cohen’s Transatlantic Voyage in IPE.” Review of International Political Economy 15 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/09692290701751241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, Steve. 2011. Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor Dethroned? Revised and Expanded ed. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, Steve. 2015. “Is Neoclassical Economics Mathematical? Is There a Non-neoclassical Mathematical Economics?” In What Is Neoclassical Economics? Debating the Origins, Meaning and Significance, edited by Jamie Morgan, 238–254. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner, Jonathan. 2014. American Power After the Financial Crisis. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, March. 2015. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 1997. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 1999. “Connections and Distinctions: Post Keynesianism and Critical Realism.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 22 (1): 3–14. doi: 10.1080/01603477.1999.11490224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2013. “What Is This “School” Called Neoclassical Economics?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37: 947–983. doi: 10.1093/cje/bet027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna. 2009. “Why We Need Multiple Stories About the Global Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 16 (2): 321–328. doi: 10.1080/09692290902718486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milonakis, Dimitris, and Ben Fine. 2009. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, Hyman. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patomäki, Heikki. 2003. “A Critical Realist Approach to Global Political Economy.” In Critical Realism: The Difference It Makes, edited by Justin Cruickshank, 197–220. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patomäki, Heikki. 2008. The Political Economy of Global Security: War, Future Crises and Changes in Global Governance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patomäki, Heikki. 2009. “How to Tell Better Stories About the History and Future of Global Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 16 (2): 309–320. doi: 10.1080/09692290902718478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, John. 2007. “In Search of the Missing Middle.” Review of International Political Economy 15 (1): 18–29. doi: 10.1080/09692290701751258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, Lawrence. 2014. “U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound.” Business Economics 49 (2): 65–73. doi: 10.1057/be.2014.13
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. Roy. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, Michael. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar