Normativity and naturalism as if nature mattered

References

• Abbott, R., and E. Burkitt. 2015. Child Development and the Brain. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S., ed. 2009. Conversations About Reflexivity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barham, J. 2012. “Normativity, Agency and Life.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 92–103. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1978. The Possibility of Naturalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F., and P. L. Luisi. 2014. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. 2015. Intelligence in the Flesh. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, A. 1999. Being and Worth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, A. 2003. In Defence of Objectivity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 2006. (Rev.Edn) Descartes’ Error. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 2018. The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, F. 2013. The Bonobo and the Atheist. New York: W.W.Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, N. 2007. The Brain That Changes Itself. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2010. “Realist Critique Without Ethical Naturalism and Moral Realism.” Journal of Critical Realism 9 (1): 33–58. doi: 10.1558/jcr.v9i1.33
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2012. The Reality of Social Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. 2014. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. 1970. Principles of Scientific Thinking. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2012. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, W. 2016. Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1985. After Virtue. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Michilini, F. 2012. “Hegel’s Notion of Natural Purpose.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Midgley, M. 1978. Beast and Man. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, M. 1984. Wickedness: A Philosophical Essay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, M. 2003. Heart and Mind. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, L., and D. J. Nicholson. 2012. “On Nature and Normativity: Normativity, Teleology, and Mechanism in Biological Explanation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 88–91. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murdoch, I. 1970. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2013. Creating Capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porges, S. W. 2011. The Polyvagal Theory. New York: W.W.Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact–Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and J. Abi-Rached. 2014. Neuro. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000. “For Postdisciplinary Studies: Sociology and the Curse of Disciplinary Parochialism/Imperialism.” In Sociology: Legacies and Prospects, edited by J. Eldridge, J. MacInnes, S. Scott, C. Warhurst, and A. Witz, 85–97. Durham: Sociologypress.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2017. “Values within Reason.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 54 (4): 468–475. doi: 10.1111/cars.12172
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. 1999. The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. [1759] 1984. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. [1967] 1973. “Neutrality and Political Science.” In The Philosophy of Social, 139–170.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1989. “Neutrality in Political Science.” In The Philosophy of Social Explanation, edited by A. Ryan, 139–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2007. Child Poverty in Perspective: An Overview of Child Well-Being in Rich Countries. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/445-child-poverty-in-perspective-an-overview-of-child-well-being-in-rich-countries.html.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Kolk, B. 2014. The Body Keeps the Score. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar