Vindicating Archer’s concepts of educational systems – centralized and decentralized – as exemplars of critical realist theorizing

References

• Aasen, P. 1999. “Det sosialdemokratiske prosjektet. Utdanningsreformer i Sverige og Norge i etterkrigstiden [The Social-Democratic Project. Educational Reforms in Sweden and Norway After the Second World War].” In Både – og. 90-tallets utdanningsreformer i historisk perspektiv, edited by A. O. Telhaug and P. Aasen, 13–64. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1983. “Process Without System.” European Journal of Sociology 24: 196–221. doi: 10.1017/S0003975600004021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1984. Social Origins of Educational Systems. University Edition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. [1979] 2013. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, A.-L., and L. Lundahl. 2006. “Still Social and Democratic? Inclusive Education Policies in the Nordic Welfare States.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50 (3): 285–300. doi: 10.1080/00313830600743316
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2008. A Realist Theory of Science (with a New Introduction). London: Routledge. (RTS).
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. [1979] 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge. (PON).
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, C. 2006. “Introduction.” In Educational Decentralization: Asian Experiences and Conceptual Contributions, edited by C. Bjork, 1-7. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnset, M., H. Høst, T. Nyen, K. Reegård, and A. Hagen Tønder. 2018. Evaluering av vekslingsmodeller i fag- og yrkesopplæringen [Evaluation of Alternation Models in Vocational Education and Training]. Sluttrapport. Oslo: Fafo-rapport 2018: 42 & NIFU-rapport 2018: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M. 2013. “Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decentralization.” In Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, edited by R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, and S. Franz, 188–207. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekström, L. Jakobsen, and J. Ch. Karlson. 2002. Explaining Society. Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Key Data on Education in Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Eurostat. Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, R. 2013. Ontology Revisited. Metaphysics in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, E. M. 2006. “Strategies of Educational Decentralization: Key Questions and Core Issues.” In Educational Decentralization. Asian Experiences and Conceptual Contributions, edited by C. Bjork, 9–25. Dordrecht: Springer. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region Series. Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., S. Link, and L. Wossmann. 2013. “Does School Autonomy Make Sense Everywhere? Panel Estimates From PISA.” Journal of Development Economics 104 (C): 212–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, B. 2009. “ Educational Decentralization and Student Achievement. A Comparative Study Utilizing Data From PISA to Investigate a Potential Relationship Between School Autonomy and Student Performance in Australia, Canada, Finland, Norway and Sweden.” Master Thesis. University of Oslo: Faculty of Education. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/31127/MasterxThesisxBeritxHaugxPFI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I. 2003. “Fra skole til tjenesteleverandør? Endringsprosesser i norsk grunnskole [From School to Service-Provider? Processes of Change in Norwegian Basic Education].” Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift 19 (1): 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., and A. Homme. 2007. “Toward a New Professionalism in School? A Comparative Study of Teacher Autonomy in Norway and Sweden.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (3): 232–249. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.232
   Google Scholar
• Høst, H., E. Hovdhaugen, et al. 2013. “Ny struktur – tradisjonelle mønstre. Kunnskapsløftets endringer i historisk perspektiv [New Structure – Traditional Patterns. The Changes of the Knowledge Promotion Reform in Historical Perspective].” In Reformtakter. Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen, edited by B. Karseth, 61–81. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, G. E. 2000. “Decentralized Centralism: Framework for a Better Understanding of Governance in the Field of Education.” Journal of Education Policy 15 (5): 525–538. doi: 10.1080/026809300750001676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., and B. U. Engelsen. 2013. “Læreplanen for kunnskapsløftet: Velkjente tråkk og nye spor [The Curriculum of the Knowledge Promotion Reform – Familiar and New Tracks].” In Reformtakter. Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform-Rythms. On Renewal and Stability in Basic Education], edited by B. Karseth, J. Møller, and P. Aasen, 43–60. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., J. Møller, and P. Aasen. 2013. “Opptakten.” In Reformtakter. Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform-Rythms. On Renewal and Stability in Basic Education], 13–20. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lauglo, J. 1995. “Forms of Decentralisation and Their Implications for Education.” Comparative Education 31 (1): 5–30. doi: 10.1080/03050069529182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. 2013. “Accountable for What and to Whom? Changing Representations and New Legitimation Discourses Among Teachers Under Increased External Control.” Journal of Educational Change 14: 423–444. doi: 10.1007/s10833-013-9212-y
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., T. S. Prøitz, E. Rye, and P. Aasen. 2013. “Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform.” In Reformtakter. Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform-Rythms. On Renewal and Stability in Basic Education], edited by B. Karseth, l. Møller, and P. Aasen, 23–41. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, The Norwegian Ministry of Church and Education, and The Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Science. 1989. OECD-vurdering av norsk utdanningspolitikk. Norsk rapport til OECD. Ekspertvurdering fra OECD. [OECD-evaluation of Norwegian Educational Policy. Norwegian National Report to the OECD and Expert-evaluation of the Norwegian report by the OECD.]. Oslo: Aschehoug & Co (William Nygaard).
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 1998. “Abstraction: A Realist Interpretation.” In Critical Realism. Essential Readings, edited by M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, and A. Norrie, 120–140. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2010. Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solstad, K. J. 1978. Riksskole i utkantstrok [The National School in Peripheral Regions]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Volckmar, N., and S. Wiborg. 2014. “A Social Democratic Response to Market-Led Education Policies: Concession or Rejection.” In The Nordic Education Model: ‘A School for All’ Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy, edited by U. Blossing, L. Moos, and G. Imsen, 117–131. Dordrecht: Springer. Policy Implications of Research in Education 1.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, H. N. 1990. “Comparative Perspectives on Educational Decentralization: An Exercise in Contradiction?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 (4): 433–448. doi: 10.3102/01623737012004433
   Google Scholar
• White Paper, Kultur for læring [Culture for Learning] (Meld. S. 30 (2003-2004)).
   Google Scholar
• White Paper, Om organisering og styring i utdanningssektoren [On Organising and Governing the Education Sector] (Meld. S. 37 (1990–1991))
   Google Scholar
• White Paper, Utdanning for velferd [Education for Welfare] (Meld. S. 13 (2011-2012)).
   Google Scholar
• White Paper, På rett vei [On the Right Track] (Meld. S. 20 (2012-2013)).
   Google Scholar
• Wiborg, S. 2013. “Neo-liberalism and Universal State Education: The Cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980-2011.” Comparative Education 49 (4): 407–423. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2012.700436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wöbmann, L., E. Lüdemann, G. Schütz, and M. R. West. 2007. “ School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice and the Level of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003.” OECD Education Working Papers, No 13. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Zajda, J. 2006. “Introduction.” In Decentralisation and Privatisation in Education. The Role of the State, edited by J. Zajda, 3–27. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar