A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes

References

• Ackroyd, S., and J. C. Karlsson. 2014. “Critical Realism, Research Techniques, and Research Designs.” In Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide, edited by P. K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, and S. Vincent, 21–45. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, A. 2011. “Between Modernization and Mutual Aid: The Changing Perceptions of Voluntary Sports Clubs in England.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 3 (1): 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2007. “The Ontological Status of Subjectivity: The Missing Link Between Structure and Agency.” In Contributions to Social Ontology, edited by C. Lawson, J. Latsis, and N. Martins, 17–31. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Astbury, B. 2018. “Making Claims Using Realist Methods.” In Doing Realist Research, edited by N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, and S. Dalkin, 59–78. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, J. 2001. “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative research 1 (3): 385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1978. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1989. Reclaiming Reality. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2016. “(Mis)conceptualising Themes, Thematic Analysis, and Other Problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) Sample-Size Tool for Thematic Analysis.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 19 (6): 739–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019a. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019b. “To Saturate or Not to Saturate? Questioning Data Saturation as a Useful Concept for Thematic Analysis and Sample-Size Rationales.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. Epub ahead of print 26 December 2019. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., V. Clarke, and P. Weate. 2016. “Using Thematic Analysis in Sport and Exercise Research.” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Sport and Exercise, edited by B. Smith and A. Sparkes, 191–205. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and K. Pedersen O. 2013. “Coding In-Depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement.” Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3): 294–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., P. MacIntyre, and J. Cruickshank. 2007. “A Critical Realist Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Heart Health Programmes.” Health 11 (4): 513–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, F., A. Gillespie, and T. Zittoun. 2013. “Collaborative Analysis of Qualitative Data.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 79–93. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and D. L. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekstrom, L. Jakobsen, and J. Karlsson. 2002. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekström, and J. C. Karlsson. 2019. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Decoteau, C. L. 2017. “The AART of Ethnography: A Critical Realist Explanatory Research Model.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47 (1): 58–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N., J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, and S. Dalkin, eds. 2018. Doing Realist Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. 2010. “Qualitative Interviewing as an Embodied Emotional Performance.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (3): 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. J. 2017. “Applying Critical Realism in Qualitative Research: Methodology Meets Method.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2): 181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., K. M. MacQueen, and E. E. Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoddy, E. T. 2019. “Critical Realism in Empirical Research: Employing Techniques from Grounded Theory Methodology.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (1): 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. 2019. “Realist Synthesis for Public Health: Building an Ontologically-Deep Understanding of How Programs Work, for Whom, and in Which Circumstances.” Annual Review of Public Health 40: 361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. 2020. “Retroductive Theorizing in Pawson and Tilley’s Applied Scientific Realism.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (2): 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J., A. C. MacAulay, P. Pluye, J. O. N. Salsberg, P. L. Bush, J. I. M. Henderson, and E. Sirett. 2012. “Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice.” The Milbank Quarterly 90 (2): 311–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In Qualitative Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide For Students and Practitioners, edited by D. Harper and A. Thompson, 209–223. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, B., and Y. W. Chen. 2019. “Developing a Method of Critical Thematic Analysis for Qualitative Communication Inquiry.” Howard Journal of Communications 30 (1): 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusted, J. 2018. “A Critical Realist Morphogenetic Approach to Researching Sport Policy: Reflections on a Large-Scale Study of Policy Implementation in Grassroots English Football.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 10 (4): 705–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. 1992. “Understanding and validity In Qualitative Research.” Harvard Educational Review 62 (3): 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2010. “Using Numbers in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (6): 475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2012. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLeish, T. 2016. Crossing Paths: A British Academy Report on Interdisciplinarity in UK Universities. London: British Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., B. Marchal, S. Van Belle, and B. van Wyk. 2019. “Using the Realist Interview Approach to Maintain Theoretical Awareness in Realist Studies.” Qualitative Research 20 (4): 485–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2013. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and E. Renold. 2014. “‘F**k rape!’: Exploring Affective Intensities in a Feminist Research Assemblage.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 772–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronkainen, N. J., T. V. Ryba, M. McDougall, D. Tod, and O. Tikkanen. 2020. “Hobby, Career or Vocation? Meanings in Sports Coaching and Their Implications for Recruitment and Retention of Coaches.” Managing Sport and Leisure. Epub ahead of print 6 August 2020. doi:10.1080/23750472.2020.1803108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronkainen, N., and G. Wiltshire. 2021. “Rethinking Validity in Qualitative Sport and Exercise Psychology Research: A Realist Perspective.” International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 19 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2019.1637363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale, J. E., L. H. Lohfeld, and K. Brazil. 2002. “Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research.” Quality and Quantity 36 (1): 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 1984. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. 2018. “Generalizability in Qualitative Research: Misunderstandings, Opportunities and Recommendations for the Sport and Exercise Sciences.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10 (1): 137–149. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and K. R. McGannon. 2018. “Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities Within Sport and Exercise Psychology.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11 (1): 101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steensen, J. 2006. “Biographical Interviews in a Critical Realist Perspective.” In Annual Conference of International Association of Critical Realism, Tromsø, Norway, 11–13 August 2010, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Van Belle, S., G. Wong, G. Westhorp, M. Pearson, N. Emmel, A. Manzano, and B. Marchal 2016. “Can ‘Realist’ Randomised Controlled Trials be Genuinely Realist?” Trials 17 (1): 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G., G. Wong, T. Greenhalgh, et al. 2013. “RAMESES Publication Standards: Realist Syntheses.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 69 (5): 1005–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., T. Greenhalgh, G. Westhorp, J. Buckingham, and R. Pawson. 2013. “RAMESES Publication Standards: Realist Syntheses.” BMC Medicine 11 (1): 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, G. 2018. “A Case for Critical Realism in the Pursuit of Interdisciplinarity and Impact.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10 (5): 525–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn Jr, D. E., and C. K. Williams. 2020. “ Recent Advances and Opportunities for Improving Critical Realism-Based Case Study Research in IS.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 21 (1): 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar