Sustainable urban planning – what kinds of change do we need?

References

• Albrechts, L., G. Baeton, and A. Spithoven. 1994. “Politics, Economic Crisis and the Planning of Transport Infrastructures.” Paper presented to the conference ‘Are local strategies possible? Planning theory and social theory in front of the sustainable development problematique’, Tampere, Finland, September 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. 2001. Planning Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Assiter, A., and J. Noonan. 2007. “Human Needs: A Realist Perspective.” Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2): 173–198.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1993. Dialectic – the Pulse of Freedom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2008. A Realist Theory of Science – With a New Introduction. London: Routledge. First published 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. E. 1966. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, edited by H. Jarrett, 3–14. Baltimore, MD: Resources for the Future/Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransen, J. 2001. “Verstehen and Erklären, Philosophy of.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, edited by N. J. Smelser, and P. B. Baltes, 16165–16170. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno-Suarez, C., and D. Coq-Huelva. 2020. “Sustaining What is Unsustainable: A Review of Urban Sprawl and Urban Socio-Environmental Policies in North America and Western Europe.” Sustainability 12: 4445. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs, M., and M. Koch. 2019. “Challenges for the Degrowth Transition: The Debate About Wellbeing.” Futures, 105: 155–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 1996. “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development.” Journal of American Planning Association 62: 296–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. 2002. “Utilitarianism’s Bad Breath? A Re-Evaluation of the Public Interest Justification for Planning.” Planning Theory 1 (2): 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Cavicchia, R., and R. Cucca. 2020. “Densification and School Segregation: The Case of Oslo.” Urban Planning 5 (3): 217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby, M. E. 1991. “Environmental Management in Development: The Evolution of Paradigms.” Ecological Economics 3 (3): 193–213.
   Google Scholar
• County of North Jutland. 2004. Agenda 21. Aalborg: County of North Jutland.
   Google Scholar
• Cucca, R. 2012. “The Unexpected Consequences of Sustainability Green Cities Between Innovation and Ecogentrification.” Sociologica. doi:https://doi.org/10.2383/38269.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekström, L. Jacobsen, and J. C. Karlsson. 1997. Att Förklara Samhället. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Di Commo, F., and K. Lucas. 2014. “Evaluating the Equity Effects of Road-Pricing in the European Urban Context – The Madrid Metropolitan Area.” Applied Geography 54: 74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. 1999. Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (3): 265–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S., and N. Fainstein. 1996. “City Planning and Political Values: An Updated View.” In Readings in Planning Theory, edited by S. Campbell, and S. Fainstein, 265–287. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2019. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “A Perestroikan Straw man Answers Back: David Laitin and Phronetic Political Science.” In Making Political Science Matter, edited by S. Schram, and B. Caterino, 56–85. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 2011. “Capitalism and Degrowth: An Impossibility Theorem.” Monthly Review 62 (8). Accessed September 2021. https://monthlyreview.org/2011/01/01/capitalism-and-degrowth-an-impossibility-theorem/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. J., and J. S. Rosenthal. 2003. “Capitalism’s Growth Imperative.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (1): 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, H. 2008. Changes on the Waterfront - Transforming Harbor Areas. Working Paper, No. 2008.02. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2010. The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1996. “Planning Through debate. The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” In Readings in Planning Theory, edited by S. Campbell, and S. Fainstein, 234–257. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S., and A. Malm. 2015. “‘Green fix’ as Crisis Management, or: In Which World is Malmö the World’s Greenest City?” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 97 (4): 275–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G. 1997. “Sustainable Development.” In The Global Environment. Science, Technology and Management, edited by D. Brune, D. Chapman, M. O. Gwynne, and J. M. Pacyna, Vol. 2, 1185–1208. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G., and P. Næss. 2001. “The Ecological Traces of Growth: Economic Growth, Liberalization, Increased Consumption - and Sustainable Urban Development?” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3 (3): 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2019. Climate Change and Land. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. 2019. World Economic Outlook Database, April 2019. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2021. Cognitive Relativism. Accessed September 2021. https://iep.utm.edu/cog-rel/#H4.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J. 1989. Environmental Problems: Nature, Economy and State. London: Belhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2011. “In Defence of Degrowth.” Ecological Economics 70 (5): 837–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovel, J. 2002. The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? London: Zed Books/Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, K.-G., and B. H. Vatne. 2019. Developments in Housing Affordability. Staff memo 4/2019. Oslo: The Central Bank of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Machan, T. S. 1984. “Pollution and Political Theory.” In Earthbound: New Introductory Essays in Environmental Ethics, edited by T. Regan, 74–106. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J. 2009. “Socially Sustainable Economic de-Growth.” Development and Change 40: 1099–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., U. Pasqual, F.-D. Vivien, and E. Zaccai. 2010. “Sustainable de-Growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms and Future Prospects of an Emergent Paradigm.” Ecological Economics 69: 1741–1747. Political Science and Politics, 28, 57-71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, W., and M. Braungart. 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milankovic, B. 2017. “The Illusion of “Degrowth” in a Poor and Unequal World.” Blogpost at globalinequality. Accessed September 2021. http://glineq.blogspot.com/2017/11/the-illusion-of-degrowth-in-poor-and.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance [Norway]. 2021. Perspektivmeldingen 2021. Oslo: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1995. The Refinement of Production. Ecological Modernization Theory and the Chemical Industry. Dublin: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., G. Spaargaren, and D. A. Sonnenfeld. 2014. “Ecological Modernization Theory: Where do we Stand?” In Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart Eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften, edited by M. Bemmann, B. Metzger, and R. von Detten, 35–66. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mössner, S., and B. Miller. 2015. “Sustainability in One Place? Dilemmas of Sustainability Governance in the Freiburg Metropolitan Region.” Regions Magazine, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2015.11668692.
   Google Scholar
• Mouter, N., ed. 2020. Appraisal Methods. Series: Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 1989. “Sustainable Urban Development: The Challenges of the Brundtland Commission—a Turning Point for Urban Planning?” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 6 (1): 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 1993. “Can Urban Development be Made Environmentally Sound?” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36 (3): 309–333.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2006a. “Cost-benefit Analyses of Transportation Investments: Neither Critical nor Realistic.” Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1): 32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2006b. “Unsustainable Growth, Unsustainable Capitalism.” Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2): 197–227.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2010. “The Dangerous Climate of Disciplinary Tunnel Vision.” In Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change, edited by R. Bhaskar, C. Frank, K. G. Høyer, P. Næss, and J. Parker, 54–84. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2012. “Urban Form and Travel Behavior: Experience from a Nordic Context.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 5 (2): 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2015a. “Critical Realism, Urban Planning and Urban Research.” European Planning Studies 23 (6): 1228–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2015b. “Built Environment, Causality and Travel.” Transport Reviews 35 (3): 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2016. “The Illusion of Green Capitalism.” In Crisis System: A Critical Realist and Environmental Critique of Economics and the Economy, edited by P. Næss, and L. Price, 173–191. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2017. “Housing Culture, Residential Preferences and Sustainability.” In Design for a Sustainable Culture, edited by A. Skjerven, and J. B. Reitan, 69–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2019. “Meta-analyses of Built Environment Effects on Travel: No new Platinum Standard.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19856425.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., L. Hansson, T. Richardson, and A. Tennøy. 2013. “Knowledge-based Land use and Transport Planning? Consistency and gap Between ‘State-of-the-Art’ Knowledge and Knowledge Claims in Planning Documents in Three Scandinavian City Regions.” Planning Theory & Practice 14 (4): 470–491.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., and K. R. Moberg. Forthcoming. “Change Processes and Driving Forces Behind Urban Spatial Development in Four Norwegian Municipalities.” Nordic Journal of Urban Studies 1.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., T. Næss, and A. Strand. 2011a. “Oslo’s Farewell to Urban Sprawl.” European Planning Studies 19 (1): 113–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., and I. L. Saglie. 2000. “Surviving Between the Trenches: Planning Research, Methodology and Theory of Science.” European Planning Studies 8 (6): 729–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., I.-L. Saglie, and T. Richardson. 2020. “Urban Sustainability: is Densification Sufficient?” European Planning Studies 28 (1): 146–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., A. Strand, T. Næss, and M. Nicolaisen. 2011b. “On Their Road to Sustainability? The Challenge of Sustainable Mobility in Urban Planning and Development in two Scandinavian Capital Regions.” Town Planning Review 82 (3): 287–317.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., A. Strand, F. Wolday, and H. Stefansdottir. 2019. “Residential Location, Commuting and non-Work Travel in two Urban Areas of Different Size and with Different Center Structures.” Progress in Planning 128: 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., G. H. Volden, J. Odeck, and T. Richardson. 2018. Neglected and Underestimated Negative Impacts of Transport Investments. Concept report no. 54. Trondheim: Ex Ante Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., and J. Xue. 2016. “Housing Standards, Environmental Sustainability and Social Welfare.” In Crisis System: A Critical Realist and Environmental Critique of Economics and the Economy, edited by P. Næss, and L. Price, 130–148. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Council of Ministers. 1999. Factors 4 and 10 in the Nordic Countries: The Transport Sector, the Forest Sector, the Building and Real Estate Sector, the Food Supply Chain. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Parrique, T., J. Barth, F. Briens, C. Kerschner, A. Kraus-Polk, A. Kuokkanen, and J. H. Spangenberg. 2019. Decoupling Debunked. Evidence and Arguments Against Green Growth as a Sole Strategy for Sustainability. Brussels: European Environmental Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2006. “Urban Democracy and the Local Trap.” Urban Studies 43: 1921–1941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., and M. Roser. 2020. “CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions [Online Resource].
   Google Scholar
• Schlaupitz, H. 2008. Energi- og klimakonsekvenser av moderne transportsystemer. Effekter ved bygging av høyhastighetsbaner i Norge. Report 3/2008. Oslo: Norges Naturvernforbund.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, J. 2001. “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Methodological Artefact?” Population and Environment 23: 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. I. 2004. “The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” World Development 32 (8): 1419–1439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. R. 2017. “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?” Journal of the American Planning Association 83: 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, A., and P. Næss. 2017. “Local Self-Determination, Process-Focus and Subordination of Environmental Concerns.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19: 156–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strannegård, L. 1999. Black-boxing eco-Modernization. Nature and Market Discourses in Leadership Practice. Stockholm: Centre for Advanced Studies in Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, K. N. 1993. “Steady-state Economics and the Command Economy.” In Valuing the Earth: Economy, Ecology, Ethics, edited by H. E. Daly, and K. N. Townsend, 275–296. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., and M. Boarnet. 2014. “Reaction to the Paper Tempest in a Teapot: The Exaggerated Problem of Transport-Related Residential Self-Selection as a Source of Error in Empirical Studies.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 7: 81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2005. Understanding Poststructuralism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum/PwC. 2018. Circular Economy in Cities Evolving the Model for a Sustainable Urban Future. White Paper. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J. 2014. Economic Growth and Sustainable Housing: An Uneasy Relationship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. C., ed. 2000. The Emergence of Ecological Modernization: Integrating the Environment and the Economy? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar