Democracy and human nature: a layered system analysis

References

• Adorno, T. W., E. Frenkel-Brunswick, D. J. Levinson, and R. N. Sanford. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper-Row.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., A. Blais, S. Bowler, T. Donovan, and O. Lisgthaug. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. D., and L. B. Stephenson, eds. 2021. What Is Democracy and How Do We Study It? Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• APA Dictionary of Psychology. 2022. https://dictionary.apa.org/aggression.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S., and J. Morgan. 2020. “Contributions to Realist Social Theory: An Interview with Margaret S. Archer.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (2): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1732760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach. 2020a. “How Is Democracy Possible? Critical Realist, Social Psychological and Psychodynamic Approaches.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (3): 252–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1758987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach. 2020b. “Why Is Democracy Desirable? Neo-Aristotelian, Critical Realist, and Psychodynamic Approaches.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (4): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1802211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach. 2021. “Populism as a Layered System: Ideological, Social Identity, and Psychodynamic Perspective.” Journal of Critical Realism 20 (4): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1966604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbus, I. D. 2010. Governing Subjects: An Introduction to the Study of Politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. 2018. Beyond Doer and Done to: Recognition Theory, Intersubjectivity and the Third. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R., B. Danermark, and L. Price, eds. 2017. Interdisciplinarity and Wellbeing: A Critical Realist General Theory of Interdisciplinarity. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bliuc, A. M., and A. Chidley. 2022. “From Cooperation to Conflict: The Role of Collective Narratives in Shaping Group Behavior.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 16 (7). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothby, E. J., M. S. Clark, and J. A. Bargh. 2014. “Shared Experiences are Amplified.” Psychological Science 25 (12): 2209–2216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1982. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. 2004. Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, D. 2018. Origin Story: A Big History of Everything. New York: Hachette Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, Tom, and Sameer Bajaj. 2022. “Democracy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/democracy/.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, P. T. 2021. The Way Out: How to Overcome Toxic Polarization. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 2015. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. 1996. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 2004. “What Is Democracy?” January 21. https://web.stanford.edu/~ldiamond/iraq/WhaIsDemocracy012004.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Intelligence Unit. 2022. Democracy Index 2021: The China Challenge. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2021/.
   Google Scholar
• Eigen, M. 2002. Rage. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. 2013. Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Think, Feel, Do and Become. New York: Hudson Street Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1): 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. F. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, B., and V. Woods. 2020. Survival of the Friendliest. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. 2016. The Secret of Our Success. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., and N. Henrich. 2007. Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, A. 2013. Politics. London: Palgrave, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, S. R. C. 2004. Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Tempe, AZ: Scholarly Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., and J. Morgan. 2022. “The Strategic-Relational Approach, Realism and the State: From Regulation Theory to Neoliberalism via Marx and Poulantzas, an Interview with Bob Jessop.” Journal of Critical Realism 21 (1): 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1995685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, S. 2015. “Outgroup Prejudice from an Evolutionary Perspective: Survey Evidence from Europe.” Journal of International and Global Studies 7:16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 1975a. Love, Guilt and Reparation: And Other Works 1921–1945. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 1975b. Envy and Gratitude and Other Works, 1946–1963. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. 1985. The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kupperman, J. J. 2010. Theories of Human Nature. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. 1984. Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, J. 2003a. “Federalist 10.” In The Federalist Papers, edited by C. Rossiter, 179. New York: Signet.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, J. 2003b, “Federalist 55.” In The Federalist Papers, edited by C. Rossiter, 195. New York: Signet.
   Google Scholar
• Mandela, N. 1994. “Inaugural Speech.” https://www.bet.com/article/topqsq/transcript-nelson-mandela-s-1994-inauguration-speech.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 2018. Uncivil Disagreement: How Politics Becomes our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, N. 2019. Fear of Breakdown: Politics and Psychoanalysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, J. 2008. “Concession Speech.” https://www.npr.org/2008/11/05/96631784/transcript-of-john-mccains-concession-speech.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, R. 2016. Social Contract Theory for a Diverse World: Beyond Tolerance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2004. “Convention Speech.” https://www.npr.org/2012/09/06//160713941/transcript president-obamas-convention-speech.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., and J. Mansbridge, eds. 2013. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Theories of Institutional Design). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patomäki, H., and J. Morgan. 2023. “World Politics, Critical Realism and the Future of Humanity: An Interview with Heikki Patomäki, Part 2.” Journal of Critical Realism, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2023.2188541.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. 2019. Crises of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2012. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2010. What is a Person: Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2015. To Flourish or Destruct: A Personalist Theory of Human Goods, Motivation, Failure and Evil. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. 1975. “Toward a Functional Definition of Narcissism.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 56 (2): 179–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strozier, C. B., D. L. Strug, K. Pinteris, and K. Kelley. 2017. “Heinz Kohut’s Theory of Aggression and Rage.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 34:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 37–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S. 2019. This View of Life: Completing the Darwinian Revolution. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, R. 2012. Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism. New York: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wrangham, R. 2019. The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zell, P. M. 1980. Ben Franklin Laughing. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar