Observing local dynamics of ILSA projections in federal systems: a comparison between Germany and the United States

References

• Achieve. 1999. 1999 National Education Summit. Briefing Book. Washington, DC: Achieve.
   Google Scholar
• Aljets, E. 2015. Der Aufstieg der Empirischen Bildungsforschung. Ein Beitrag zur institutionalistischen Wissenschaftssoziologie [The Rise of Empirical Educational Research. A Contribution to the Institutionalist Sociology of Scientific Knowledge]. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2011. “Topological Twists: Power’s Shifting Geographies.” Dialogues in Human Geography 1: 283–298. doi:10.1177/2043820611421546.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, J., and S. Leibfried. 2003. “Education and the Welfare State: The Four Worlds of Competence Production.” Journal of European Social Policy 13 (1): 63–81; 031047. doi: 10.1177/0958928703013001047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. 2007. Congress and the Classroom: From the Cold War to “No Child Left Behind”. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K. 2004. “OECD and National Welfare State Development.” In The OECD and European Welfare States, edited by K. Armingeon, and M. Beyeler, 226–241. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., K. S. Cortina, and A. Leschinsky. 2003. “Grundlegende Entwicklungen Und Strukturprobleme Im Allgemeinbildenden Schulwesen [Fundamental Developments and Structural Problems in General School Education].” In Das Bildungswesen in Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Strukturen Und Entwicklungen Im Überblick [The Education System of the Federal Republic of Germany. Structures and Developments at a Glance], edited by K. S. Cortina, J. Baumert, A. Leschinsky, K. U. Mayer, and L. Trommer, 52–147. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Bloem, S. 2016. Die PISA-Strategie der OECD – Zur Bildungspolitik eines globalen Akteurs [The PISA strategy of the OECD – The Education Policy of a Global Actor]. Weinheim: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). 2007. Vertiefender Vergleich Der Schulsysteme Ausgewählter Pisa-Teilnehmerstaaten [In-Depth Comparison of School Systems of Selected States Participating in PISA]. Bonn, Berlin: BMBF.
   Google Scholar
• BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). 2008. Rahmenprogramm Zur Förderung Der Empirischen Bildungsforschung / Framework Programme for the Promotion of Educational Research. Bonn, Berlin: BMBF.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, W., and T. N. Postlethwaite. 2002. “Internationale Schulleistungsforschung: Ihre Entwicklungen und Folgen für die deutsche Bildungslandschaft [International Student Assessment Research. Developments and Consequences for the German Education Landscape].” In Leistungsmessungen in Schulen [Performance Measurement in Schools], edited by F. Weinert, 251–267. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• CEP (Center on Education Policy). 2012. A Public Education Primer. Basic (and Sometimes Surprising) Facts About the U.S. Educational System. Washington, DC: CEP.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C. T. 2004. From a Nation at Risk to no Child Left Behind: National Education Goals and the Creation of Federal Education Policy. New York, NY: Teacher College.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, R., C. Arndt, M. Mullers, J. Vakkuri, K. Engblom-Pelkkala, and C. Hood. 2013. “A Lever for Improvement or a Magnet for Blame? Press and Political Responses to International Educational Rankings in Four EU Countries.” Public Administration 91 (2): 484–505. doi:10.1111/padm.12013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein, B., and R. Nikolai. 2013. “Strukturwandel im Sekundarbereich. Determinanten schulpolitischer Reformprozesse in Sachsen und Hamburg [Structural Change in Secondary Education. Determinants of School Reform Processes in Saxony and Hamburg].” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik [Journal of Education] 59 (4): 482–494.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, L. C., and M. O. Frizzell. 2015. “Competitive Comparison and PISA Bragging Rights: Sub-National Uses of the OECD's PISA in Canada and the USA.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 665–682. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1017446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. 2010. “Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective.” In Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by J. Mahoney, and K. Thelen, 204–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and R. C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44: 936–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. 2012. “Overcoming Resistance to Change: PISA, School Reform in Germany and the Example of Lower Saxony.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (6): 747–760. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.672657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. 2015. “Global Policy Convergence Through “Distributed Governance”? The Emergence of “National” Education Standards in the US and Germany.” Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 31 (1): 10–33. doi:10.1080/21699763.2014.977803.
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. 2016. “New Structures of Power and Regulation Within ‘Distributed’ Education Policy – the Example of the US Common Core State Standards Initiative.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (2): 213–225. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1103903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. 2018. Standardisierte Bildungsreformen in den USA. Vergessene Ursprünge und aktuelle Transformationen [Standards-Based Education Reform in the US. Forgotten Origins and Current Transformations]. Weinheim/Basel: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semi-Souvereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W. 2004. “Turning Points: A History of American School Governance.” In Who’s in Charge Here? The Tangled Web of School Governance and Policy, edited by N. Epstein, 14–41. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. E., and M. Hüchtermann. 2003. “Schulsystem: Indikatoren Für Leistung Und Effizienz [The School System: Indicators for Performance and Efficiency].” In Bildungs-Benchmarking Deutschland. Was macht ein effizientes Bildungssystem aus? [Education Benchmarking in Germany. What Makes an Efficient Education System?], edited by H.-P. Klös, and R. Weiß, 87–208. Köln: Deutscher Instituts-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• KMK (Kultusministerkonferenz). 2002. “PISA 2000 - Zentrale Handlungsfelder. Zusammenfassende Darstellung der laufenden und geplanten Maßnahmen in den Ländern [PISA 2000 – Central Fields of Action. Summary of the Current and Planned Measures of the Länder].” Beschluss der 299. Kultusministerkonferenz vom 17./18.10.2002. Bonn: KMK.
   Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S., and K. Martens. 2008. “PISA – Internationalisierung von Bildungspolitik. Oder: Wie kommt die Landespolitik zur OECD? [PISA – Internationalisation of Education Policy. Or: How Does a National Policy Comes to the OECD?].” Leviathan 36 (1): 3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11578-008-0001-6
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. 2016. “Governing Schooling Through ‘What Works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools.” Journal of Education Policy, doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., and B. Lingard. 2015. “The Multiple Effects of International Large-Scale Assessment on Education Policy and Research.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 621–637. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1039765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. “A Gradual Theory of Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by J. Mahoney, and K. Thelen, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. 2010. “USA – Wie man PISA auch ignorieren kann [USA – How to Ignore PISA].” In Das PISA-Echo: Internationale Reaktionen auf die Bildungsstudie [The PISA Echo: International Reactions to the Education Study], edited by P. Knodel, K. Martens, D. de Olano, and M. Popp, 235–250. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., A.-K. Nagel, M. Windzio, and A. Weymann, eds. 2010. Transformation of Education Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., and D. Niemann. 2013. “When Do Numbers Count? The Differential Impact of the PISA Rating and Ranking on Education Policy in Germany and the US.” German Politics 22: 314–332. doi:10.1080/09644008.2013.794455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. 2013. The Allure of Order: High Hopes, Dashed Expectations, and the Troubled Quest to Remake American Schooling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (Special Issue 1990): 213–253. http://www.jstor.org/stable/764990. doi: 10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.213
   Google Scholar
• NGA, CCSSO and Achieve. 2008. Benchmarking for Success: Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World-Class Education. Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, D. 2010. “Turn of the Tide - New Horizons in German Education Policymaking Through IO Influence.” In Transformation of Education Policy, edited by K. Martens, A.-K. Nagel, M. Windzio, and A. Weymann, 77–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, D. 2014. “After the Big Bang – German Education Policy in the Wake of the Pisa Study and the Bologna Process.” In Internationalization of Education Policy. A New Constellation of Statehood in Education?, edited by K. Martens, P. Knodel, and M. Windzio, 91–114. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, D. 2016. “Germany: The Intersection of International Achievement Testing and Educational Policy Development.” In The Intersection of International Achievement Testing and Educational Policy. Global Perspectives on Large-Scale Reform, edited by L. Volante, 19–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, D., K. Martens, and J. Teltemann. 2017. “PISA and its Consequences: Shaping Education Policies Through International Comparisons.” European Journal of Education 52 (2): 175–183. doi:10.1111/ejed.12220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2001. Knowledge and Skills for Life. First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) 2000. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. What Makes School Systems Perform? Seeing School Systems Through the Prism of Pisa. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011a. Starting Strong III: A Quality Toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011b. Lessons from Pisa for the United States. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. 2008. So Much Reform, So Little Change: The Persistence of Failure in Urban Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2015. “Power and Path Dependence.” In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, edited by J. Mahoney, and K. Thelen, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P., and T. Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson, and H. V. Milner, 693–721. New York: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J., B. Edelstein, and J. M. Blanck. 2016. “Awareness-raising, Legitimation or Backlash? Effects of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Education Systems in Germany.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 14 (2): 227–250. doi:10.1080/14767724.2014.982076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radtke, F.-O. 2003. “Die Erziehungswissenschaft der OECD – Aussichten Auf Die Neue Performanz-Kultur [The Educational Science of the OECD – Prospects for the New Performance Culture].” Erziehungswissenschaft [Educational Science] 27: 109–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., and B. Lingard. 2013. “PISA and the Expanding Role of the OECD in Global Educational Governance.” In PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance, edited by H. D. Meyer, and A. Benavot, 185–206. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. 2003. “The Politics of League Tables.” Journal of Social Science Education 1: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. 2010. “The Politics and Economics of Comparison.” Comparative Education Review 54 (3): 323–342. doi:10.1086/653047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. 2008. “Historical Institutionalism.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by D. della Porta, and M. Keating, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. Thelen. 2005. “Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by W. Streek, and K. Thelen, 1–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tillmann, K.-J., K. Dedering, D. Kneuper, C. Kuhlmann, and I. Nessel. 2008. Pisa Als Bildungspolitisches Ereignis. Fallstudien in Vier Bundesländern. Schule und Gesellschaft [Pisa as an Educational Policy Event. Case Studies in Four Federal States. School and Society]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. 2017. “Projecting Images of the ‘Good’ and the ‘Bad School’: Top Scorers in Educational Large-Scale Assessments as Reference Societies.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 47 (5): 647–664. doi:10.1080/03057925.2016.1262245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. 2008. “Die Schulpolitik - Kernbestand der Kulturhoheit [School Polity – A Core Component of Cultural Sovereignty].” In Die Politik der Bundesländer. Staatstätigkeit im Vergleich [The Polity of the German Länder. Government Activity in Comparison], edited by A. Hildebrandt, and F. Wolf, 21–41. Wiesbaden VS: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Zapp, M., and J. W. Powell. 2016. “How to Construct an Organizational Field: Empirical Educational Research in Germany, 1995–2015.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (5): 537–557. doi:10.1177/1474904116641422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar