Global competence in PISA 2018: deconstruction of the measure

References

• Abdi, A. A. 2011. “De-monoculturalizing Global Citizenship Education: The Need for Multicentric Intentions and Practices.” In Global Citizenship Education in Institutions of Higher Education: Issues of Policy and Practice, edited by L. Shultz, A. A. Abdi, and G. Richardson, 25–39. New York: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/978-1-4539-0136-6.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., M. Thier, and C. Pitts. 2017. “Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Skill Assessment Alternatives: Self-Reports, Situational-Judgment Tests, and Discrete Choice Experiments.” Learning and Individual Differences 53: 47–60. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, T. 2021. “Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and the OECD PISA Global Competence Framework.” Journal of Research in International Education 20 (2): 154–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., K. Brown, C. Cartwright, M. Davis, D. Deardorff, D. Hearn-Chung Gin, and D. G. Smith. 2009. Intercultural Knowledge and Competence VALUE Rubric. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, D., and D. Couch. 2021. “Locating Inclusion Within the OECD’s Assessment of Global Competence: An Inclusive Future Through PISA 2018?” Policy Futures in Education 20 (1): 14782103211006636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andreotti, V. O. 2014. “Soft Versus Critical Global Citizenship Education.” In Development Education in Policy and Practice, edited by S. McCloskey, 21–31. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137324665_2.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 2007. Psyche: Inventions of the Other (Vol. 1). California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeWit, H. 2009. “Global Citizenship and Study Abroad: A European Comparative Perspective.” In The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad: Higher Education and the Quest for Global Citizenship, edited by R. Lewin, 212–229. London: Routledge. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9647.2010.00680.x.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, L. C., D. Rutkowski, and G. Thompson. 2019. “Toward an International Measure of Global Competence? A Critical Look at the PISA 2018 Framework.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 17 (2): 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard, B., and L. M. Harris. 2013. “Considering World History as a Space for Developing Global Citizenship Competencies.” The Educational Forum 77 (4): 438–449. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.822042.
   Google Scholar
• Goren, H. 2020. “Measuring global citizenship: Opting out and obscure comparisons in OECD’s latest assessment.” Norag blog, 17th November 2020. https://www.norrag.org/measuring-global-citizenship-opting-out-and-obscure-comparisons-in-oecds-latest-assessment-by-heela-goren/.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2007. The Role of Education Quality for Economic Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4122. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 2011. “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1): 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C., H. Pazaki, and E. Velander. 2014. “Evaluating Global Education at a Regional University: A Focus Group Research on Faculty Perspectives.” Theory in Action 7 (1): 65–75. doi:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.14004.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, B., G. P. White, and G. C. Godbey. 2006. “What Does it Mean to be Globally Competent?” Journal of Studies in International Education 10 (3): 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2017. “A new Global Policy Regime Founded on Invalid Statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and Economic Growth.” Comparative Education 53 (2): 166–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumpal, I. 2013. “Determinants of Social Desirability Bias in Sensitive Surveys: A Literature Review.” Quality and Quantity 47 (4): 2025–2047. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledger, S., L. Bailey, M. Thier, and C. Pitts. 2019. “OECD’s Approach to Measuring Global Competence: Powerful Voices Shaping Education.” Teachers College Record 121 (8): 1–40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1222614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless, T. 2013a. PISA’s China problem. Brown Center Chalkboard. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/pisas-china-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, T. 2013b. Attention OECD-PISA: Your silence on China is wrong. Brown Center Chalkboard. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/attention-oecd-pisa-your-silence-on-china-is-wrong/.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, T. 2014. PISA’s China problem continues: A response to Schleicher, Zhang, and Tucker. Brown Center Chalkboard. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/pisas-china-problem-continues-a-response-to-schleicher-zhang-and-tucker/.
   Google Scholar
• McGellin, R. T. L., A. Grand, and M. Sullivan. 2021. “Stop Avoiding the Inevitable: The Effects of Anthropomorphism in Science Writing for non-Experts.” Public Understanding of Science, doi:10.1177/0963662521991732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, D. B., and A. C. Ogden. 2011. “Initial Development and Validation of the Global Citizenship Scale.” Journal of Studies in International Education 15 (5): 445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., and R. A. Shahjahan. 2014. “The Legitimation of OECD's Global Educational Governance: Examining PISA and AHELO Test Production.” Comparative Education 50 (2): 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PISA. 2020. PISA 2018 Volume VI: Are Students Ready to Thrive in an Interconnected World? Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramady, M. A., ed. 2016. The Political Economy of Wasta: Use and Abuse of Social Capital Networking. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reysen, S., and I. Katzarska-Miller. 2018. The Psychology of Global Citizenship: A Review of Theory and Research. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L. 2021. “Provincializing the OECD-PISA Global Competences Project.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 19 (2): 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, L. G. 2003. “Education and the Contested Meanings of ‘Global Citizenship’.” Journal of Educational Change 4 (3): 269–293.
   Google Scholar
• Royle, N. 2000. “What is Deconstruction?” In Deconstructions, edited by N. Royle, 1–13. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schattle, H. 2009. “Global Citizenship in Theory and Practice.” In The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad: Higher Education and the Quest for Global Citizenship, edited by R. Lewin, 3–20. London: Routledge. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9647.2010.00680.x.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, H. 1989. Continental Philosophy II: Derrida and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, S., and E. Jenkins. 2020. “PISA: A Political Project and a Research Agenda.” Studies in Science Education, doi:10.1080/03057267.2020.1824473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M., A. Bird, M. E. Mendenhall, and G. Oddou. 2014. “Measuring Global Leader Intercultural Competency: Development and Validation of the Global Competencies Inventory (GCI).” Advances in Global Leadership 8: 115–154.
   Google Scholar
• Thier, M. 2017. “Curbing Ignorance and Apathy (Across the Political Spectrum) Through Global Citizenship Education.” Berkeley Review of Education 7 (1): 133–139. doi:10.5070/B87136747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thier, M. 2020. A Global set of Dispositions? Applying Discrete-Choice Method to Measure Global Citizenship Dispositions of Secondary-School Students in two Nations. PhD diss. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Thier, M., R. Thomas, J. Tanaka, and L. A. Minami. 2016. “Global by Design: A Participatory Evaluation of a Global Citizenship After-School Program.” Journal of Research in Curriculum and Instruction 20 (3): 220–231. doi:10.24231/rici.2016.20.3.220.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J., and K. Hacker. 2003. “The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon.” The Information Society 19: 315–326. doi:10.1080/01972240390227895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M. N., M. A. M. Thomas, C. Heyman, L. Bartlett, P. Godbole, S. Hodge, S. Naidu, T. Switzer, and F. Vavrus. 2015. Capturing Quality, Equity and Sustainability: An Actionable Vision with Powerful Indicators for a Broad and Bold Education Agenda Post-2015. New York: Open Society Foundations. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. 2019. “The Potential for Anthropomorphism in Communicating Science: Inspiration from Japan.” Cultures of Science 2 (1): 23–34. doi:10.1177/209660831900200103.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 2016. Counting What Counts: Reframing Education Outcomes. Bloomington, Indian: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 2019. “Yong Zhao: The PISA Illusion.” National Education Policy Center. https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/pisa-illusion.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 2020. “Two Decades of Havoc: A Synthesis of Criticism Against PISA.” Journal of Educational Change 21: 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar