49
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The development of the prosodic word in the speech of a hearing-impaired child with a cochlear implant device

&
Pages 187-206 | Published online: 29 Sep 2009

References

  • ADAM, G., 2002, From Variable to Optimal Grammar: Evidence from Language Acquisition and Language Change. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.
  • ADAM, G., 2003, The prosody-morphology interface in the acquisition of Hebrew verbs. A paper presented at the 2003 Child Phonology Conference. University of British Columbia.
  • ALLEN, G. and HAWKINS, S., 1980, Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh and C. A. Ferguson (Eds) Child Phonology v.I (New York: Academic Press), pp. 227–256.
  • BEN-DAVID, A., 2001, Language Acquisition and Phonological Theory: Universal and Variable Processes Across Children and Across Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University (in Hebrew).
  • BERNHARDT, B. H. and STEMBERGER, J. P., 1998, Handbook of Phonological Development from the Perspective of Constraint-based Nonlinear Phonology (San Diego: Academic Press).
  • BOOTHROYD, A., NICKERSON, R. and STEVENS, K., 1974, Temporal Patterns in the Speech of the Deaf—A Study in Remedial Training (Northampton, MA: Clarke School for the Deaf).
  • BORDEN, G. J., 1979, An interpretation of research on feedback interruption in speech. Brain and Language, 7, 307– 319.
  • CARTER, A. K., DILLON, M. and PISONI, D. B., 2002, Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: Suprasegmental analyses. Clinical linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 619– 638.
  • CHIN, S. B. and PISONI, D., 2000, A phonological system at 2 years after cochlear implantation. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14, 53– 73.
  • COSTA, J. and FREITAS, M. J., 1998, V and CV as unmarked syllables: Evidence from the acquisition of Portuguese. A paper presented at the Conference on Syllable Typology and Theory. Universidade de Lisboa.
  • DEMUTH, K., 1994, On the ‘underspecification’ of functional categories in early grammar. In B. Lust, M. Sun˜ er and J. Whitman (Eds) Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives (Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 119–134.
  • DEMUTH, K., 1995, Markedness and development of prosodic structure. In J. Beckman (Ed) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 25, pp. 13– 25.
  • DEMUTH, K., 1996a, Stages in the development of prosodic words. In E. Clarck (Ed) Proceedings from the 27th Child Language Research Forum (Stanford University, CSLI. California).
  • DEMUTH, K., 1996b, The prosodic structure of early words. In J. L. Morgan and K. Demuth (Eds) Signal to Syntax: Boot-strapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 171–184.
  • DEMUTH, K., 2001, Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In J. Weissenborn and B. Ho¨ hle (Eds) Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, Syntactic and Neurophysiological Aspects of Early Language Acquisition (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 3 – 21.
  • DEMUTH, K., 2003, Minimal and maximal words in early French. A poster presented at the 2003 Child Phonology Conference. University of British Columbia.
  • DEMUTH, K. and FEE, E. J., 1995, Minimal Prosodic Words in Early Phonological Development (Ms., Brown University and Dalhousie University).
  • DEMUTH, K. and JOHNSON, M., 2003, Truncation to Subminimal Words in Early French. (Ms., Brown University).
  • ERTMER, D. J. and MELLON, J. A., 2001, Beginning to talk at 20 months: Early vocal development in a young cochlear implant recipient. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 192– 206.
  • ERTMER, D. J., YOUNG, N., GROHNE, K., MELLON, J., JOHNSON, C., CORBETT, K. and SAINDON, K., 2002a, Vocal development in young children with cochlear implants: profiles and implications for intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 184– 195.
  • ERTMER, D. J., LEONARD, J. S. and PACHUILO, M. L., 2002b, Communication intervention for children with cochlear implants: Two case studies. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 205– 217.
  • FEE, E. J., 1997, The prosodic framework for language learning. Topics in Language Disorders, 17, 53– 62.
  • FIKKERT, P., 1994, On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure (The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics).
  • FRANK, Y., BERGMAN, M. and TOBIN, Y., 1987, Stress and intonation in a speech of hearingimpaired Hebrew-speaking children. Language and Speech, 30, 339– 356.
  • FREITAS, M. J., 1996, Onsets in early productions. In B. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert and D. Ingram (Eds) Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition(Somerville: Cascadilla Press), pp. 76–85.
  • GARRETT, S., 1998, Positional faithfulness in child speech. In P. Tamanji and K. Kusumoto (Eds) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 28, pp. 63– 76.
  • GEERS, A. E. and TOBEY, E., 1992, Effects of cochlear implants and tactile aids on the development of speech production skills in children with profound hearing impairment. The Volta Review, 94, 135– 163.
  • GEFFNER, D., 1980, Feature characteristics of spontaneous speech production in young deaf children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 443– 454.
  • GERKEN, L., 1994, A metrical account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565– 584.
  • GERKEN, L., 1996, Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language, 72, 683– 712.
  • GNANADESIKAN, A. E., 1995, Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [ROA-67, http://roa.rutgers.edu].
  • GRIJZENHOUT, J. and JOPPEN, S., 1999, First steps in the acquisition of German phonology: a case study. [ROA-304, http://roa.rutgers.edu].
  • HAYES, B., 1986, Inalterability in CV phonology. Language, 62, 321– 351.
  • HAYES, B., 1989, Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253– 306.
  • HAYES, B., 1995, Metrical Stress Theory (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
  • HUDGINS, C. and NUMBERS, F., 1942, An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf. Genetical Psychology Monograph, 25, 289– 392.
  • HUTTENLOCHER, P. R., 1990, Morphometric study of human cortex development. Neuropsychologia, 28, 517– 527.
  • HYMAN, L., 1985, A Theory of Phonological Weight (Dordrecht: Foris).
  • KAGER, R., 1989, A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch (Dordrecht: Foris).
  • KIRK, K. I., DIEFENDORT, E., RILEY, A. and OSBERGER M. J., 1995, Consonant production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 50, 154– 159.
  • KIRK, K. I. and HILL-BROWN, C., 1985, Speech and language results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 6(Suppl.), 36S – 47S.
  • KUEL, P. K., 2000, A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 11850– 11857.
  • LEE, L. L. and CANTER, S. M., 1971, Developmental sentence scoring: a clinical procedure for estimating syntax development in children’s spontaneous speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36, 315– 340.
  • LEVITT, H., MCGARR, N. S. and GEFFNER, D., 1987, Development of language and communication skills in hearing impaired children. ASHA Monographs 26 (Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association), pp. 1–158.
  • LLEO´, C., 1997, Filler syllables, proto-articles, and early prosodic constraints in Spanish and German. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock and R. Shillcock (Eds) Language Acquisition: Knowledge, Representation and Processing. Proceedings of GALA ’97 (Edinburgh University Press).
  • LLEO´, C., 2001, The interface of phonology and syntax: the emergence of the article in early acquisition of Spanish and German. In J. Weissenborn and B. Ho¨ hle (Eds) Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, Syntactic and Neurophysiological Aspects of Early Language Acquisition (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 24–44.
  • MADISON, C. L. and WONG, E. Y., 1992, Use the Clarck-Madison test of oral language with the hearing impaired: a content validity and comparative study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 25, 241– 250.
  • MARKIDES, A., 1970, The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility. British Journal of Communication Disorders, 5, 126– 140.
  • MAYNE, A. M., YOSHINAGA-ITANO, C., SEDEY, A. L. and CAREY, A., 2000, Expressive vocabulary development of infants and toddlers who are deaf or hard of hearing. The Volta Review, 100, 1– 28.
  • MCCARTHY, J. J. and PRINCE, A., 1986, Prosodic Morphology (Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass).
  • MCCARTHY, J. J. and PRINCE, A., 1990, Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 209– 283.
  • MCCARTHY, J. J. and PRINCE, A., 1991, Prosodic Minimality. A paper presented at the Conference on the Organization of Phonology. University of Illinois.
  • MCGARR, N. and OSBERGER, M., 1978, Pitch deviancy and intelligibility of deaf speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 237– 247.
  • MENYUK, P., 1980, The role of context in misarticulations. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh and C. A. Ferguson (Eds) Child Phonology vI (New York: Academic Press), pp. 211–225.
  • MONSEN, R. B., 1976, The production of English stop consonants in the speech of deaf children. Journal of Phonetics, 4, 29– 41.
  • NESPOR, M. and VOGEL, I., 1986, Prosodic Phonology (Dordrecht: Foris).
  • NESPOR, M., PEN˜ A, M. and MEHLER, J., 2003, On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 221–247.
  • NORTHERN, J. L. and DOWNS, M. P., 1991, Hearing in Children (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins), pp. 103–138.
  • OBENCHAIN, P., MENN, L. and YOSHINAGA-ITANO, C., 2000, Can speech development at 36 months in children with hearing loss be predicted from information available in the second year of life? The Volta Review, 100, 149– 180.
  • OLLER, D. K., JENSEN, H. T. and LAFAYETTE, R. H., 1978, The relatedness of phonological processes of a hearing-impaired child. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 97–105.
  • OSBERGER, M., 1978, The Effect of Timing Errors on the Intelligibility of Deaf Children’s Speech. Ph.D. thesis, City University of New-York, NY.
  • OSBERGER, M. J. and MCGARR, N., 1982, Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research Practices, 8, 221– 283.
  • OSBERGER, M. J., ROBBINS, A. M., BERRY, S. W., TODD, S. L., HESKETH, L. J. and SEDEY, A., 1991, Analysis of spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids. American Journal of Otology, 12(Suppl.), 151 – 164.
  • OTA, M., 1998, Phonological constraints and word truncation in early language acquisition. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes and H. Littlefield (Eds) Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 22 (Somerville: Cascadilla Press), pp. 598–609.
  • PARKHURST, B. and LEVITT, H., 1978, The effect of selected prosodic errors on the intelligibility of deaf speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 249– 256.
  • PARSIER, S. C. and CHUTE, P., 1991, Cochlear implants: Indications and technology. Med. Clin. North America, 75, 1267– 1276.
  • PAUL, P. V. and QUIGLEY, S. P., 1994, Language and Deafness (2nd ed.) (San Diego: Singular Publishing Group).
  • POLLACK, D., 1970, The development of a listening function. In D. Pollack (Ed) Educational Audiology for the Limited Hearing Infant (Springfield-Illinois-USA: Charles C. Thomas. Pub.), pp. 68–88.
  • PRESSNELL, L., 1973, Hearing impaired children comprehension and production of syntax in oral language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 12– 21.
  • PRINCE, A., 1980, A metrical theory of Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 511– 562.
  • PRINCE, A. and SMOLENSKY, P., 1993, Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical report RuCCSTR-2. Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.
  • QUIGLEY, S. P. and KING, C.M., 1982, The language development of deaf children and youth. In S. Rosenberg (Ed) Handbook of Applied Psycholinguistics (Hillsdale: N.J.: Erlbaum Associates), pp. 429–475.
  • ROSENHOUSE, J., 1986, Intonation problems of hearing-impaired Hebrew-speaking children. Language and Speech, 29, 69– 92.
  • SALIDIS, J. and JOHNSON, I. S., 1997, The production of minimal words: A longitudinal case study of phonological development. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 6, 1– 36.
  • SEHGAL, S. T., KIRK, K. I., SVIRSKY, M., ERTMER, D. J. and OSBERGER, M. J., 1998, Imitative consonant feature production by children with multichannel sensory aids. Ear and Hearing, 19, 72– 84.
  • SELKIRK, E., 1984, Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • SMITH, C. R., 1975, Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 795– 811.
  • STEVENS, K., NICKERSON, R. and ROLLINS, A., 1978, On describing the suprasegmental properties of the speech of deaf children. In D. McPherson, M. David (Eds) Advances in Prosthetic Devices for the Deaf: A Technical Workshop (Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf), pp. 383–416.
  • STOEL-GAMMON, C., 1985, Phonetic inventories, 15 – 24 months: A longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 505– 512.
  • STOEL-GAMMON, C. and KEHOE, M. M., 1994, Hearing impairment in infants and toddlers: Identification, vocal development, and intervention. In J. E. Bernthal and N. W. Bankson (Eds) Child Phonology: Characteristics, Assessment, and Intervention with Special Populations (New York: Thieme Medical Publisher Inc).
  • STOEL-GAMMON, C. and OTOMO, K., 1986, Babbling development of hearing-impaired and normally hearing subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 33– 41.
  • TAELMAN, H., 2004, Syllable Omissions and Additions in Dutch Child Language: An Inquiry into the Function of Rhythm and the Link with Innate Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Antwerpen.
  • TOBEY, E. A. and HASENSTAB, M. S., 1991, Effects of nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children. Ear and Hearing, 4(Suppl.), 48S – 54S.
  • TOBEY, E., PANCAMO, S., STALLER, S. J., BRIMACOMBE, J. A. and BEITER, A. L., 1991, Consonant production in children receiving a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 12, 23– 31.
  • TOBEY, E., GEERS, A. and BRENNER, C., 1994, Speech production results: Speech feature acquisition. The Volta Review, 96, 109– 129.
  • TOBIN, Y., 1997, Phonology as Human Behavior: Theoretical Implications and Clinical Applications (Durham: Duke University Press).
  • TUBUL, G., (in progress). The Phonology of Hebrew-speaking Dyspraxic Children. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University (in Hebrew).
  • TYE-MURRAY, N. and KIRK, K. I., 1993, Vowel and diphthong production by young users of cochlear implants and the relationship between the phone level evaluation and spontaneous speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 488– 502.
  • VIHMAN, M. and VELLEMAN, S., 2000, Phonetics and origins of phonology. In N. Burton- Roberts, P. Carr and G. Docherty (Eds) Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues (New-York: Oxford University Press).
  • WALLACE, V., MENN, L. and YOSHINAGA-ITANO, C., 2000, Is babble the gateway to speech for all children? A longitudinal study of children who are deaf or hard of hearing. The Volta Review, 100, 121– 148.
  • WALTZMAN, S. B. and COHEN, N. L., 1998, Cochlear implantation in children younger than two years old. American Journal of Otology, 19, 158– 162.
  • WOOD, D., 1984, Aspects of the linguistic competence of deaf children. British Journal of Audiology, 18, 23– 30.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.