On biotas and their names

References

• Arrigoni, P.V. 1973. Le categorie corologiche in botanica. Lavori della Società Italiana di Biogeografia Nuova Serie 4, 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Báez, J.C., Real, R., Vargas, J.M. & Flores-Moya, A. 2005. Chorotypes of seaweeds from the western Mediterranean Sea and the Adriatic Sea: an analysis based on the genera Audouinella (Rhodophyta), Cystoseira (Phaeophyceae) and Cladophora (Chlorophyta). Phycological Research 53, 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2004. Species as individuals. Biology and Philosophy 19, 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casazza, G. & Minuto, L. 2009. A critical evaluation of different methods for the determination of areas of endemism and biotic elements: an Alpine study. Journal of Biogeography 36, 2056–2065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernov, Y.L. 1975. Principal synecological characteristics of soil invertebrates and methods of their examination. In: Ghilarov, M.S., Ed., Methods of Soil Zoological Investigations. Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 160–216 [in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Cracraft, J. 1994. Species diversity, biogeography and the evolution of biotas. American Zoologist 34, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Craw, R.C., Grehan, J.R. & Heads, M.J. 1999. Panbiogeography: Tracking the History of Life. Oxford Biogeography series 11. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Crisci, J.V., Katinas, L. & Posadas, P. 2003. Historical Biogeography: An Introduction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Croizat, L. 1958. Panbiogeography. Vols. 1 and 2. Published by the author, Caracas, Venezuela.
   Google Scholar
• Croizat, L. 1964. Space, Time, Form: The Biological Synthesis. Published by the author, Caracas, Venezuela.
   Google Scholar
• Crother, B.I. & Murray, C.M. 2011. Ontology of areas of endemism. Journal of Biogeography 38, 1009–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crother, B.I. & Murray, C.M. 2013. Parsimony analysis of endemism under the ‘areas of endemism as individuals’ thesis. Cladistics 29, 571–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• De Lattin, G. 1957. Die Ausbreitungszentren del holarktischen Landtierwelt. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Hamburg Zoologische Anzeige Supplement 20, 380–410.
   Google Scholar
• De Queiroz, K. 1999. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Wilson, R.A., Ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 49–89.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, E.R. 1931. The herpetological fauna of the Americas. Copeia 3, 106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Gámez, N., Escalante, T., Espinosa, D., Eguiarte, L.E. & Morrone, J.J. 2014. Temporal dynamics of areas of endemism under climate change: a case study of Mexican Bursera (Burseraceae). Journal of Biogeography 41, 871–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiselin, M. 1980. Biogeographical units: more on radical solutions. Systematic Zoology 29, 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Giokas, S. & Sfenthourakis, S. 2008. An improved method for the identification of areas of endemism using species co-occurrences. Journal of Biogeography 35, 893–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-GonzÁlez, S., Cavieres, L.A., Teneb, E.A. & Arroyo, J. 2004. Biogeographical analysis of species of the tribe Cytiseae (Fabaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Journal of Biogeography 31, 1659–1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halffter, G. 1962. Explicación preliminar de la distribución geográfica de los Scarabaeidae mexicanos. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 5, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Halffter, G. 1964. La entomofauna americana, ideas acerca de su origen y distribución. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 6, 1–108.
   Google Scholar
• Halffter, G. 1976. Distribución de los insectos en la Zona de Transición Mexicana: relaciones con la entomofauna de Norteamérica. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 35, 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Halffter, G. 1987. Biogeography of the montane entomofauna of Mexico and Central America. Annual Review of Entomology 32, 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halffter, G., Favila, M.E. & Arellano, L. 1995. Spatial distribution of three groups of Coleoptera along an altitudinal transect in the Mexican Transition Zone and its biogeographical implications. Elytron 9, 151–185.
   Google Scholar
• Harold, A.S. & Mooi, R.D. 1994. Areas of endemism: definition and recognition criteria. Systematic Biology 43, 261–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausdorf, B. 2002. Units in biogeography. Systematic Biology 51, 648–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausdorf, B. & Hennig, C. 2003. Biotic element analysis in biogeography. Systematic Biology 52, 717–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausdorf, B. & Hennig, C. 2007. Biotic element analysis and vicariance biogeography. In: Ebach, M.C. & Tangney, R.S., Eds., Biogeography in a Changing World. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series 70. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, D.L. 1980. Individuality and selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, S.W. & Crisp, M.D. 2003. Assessing endemism at multiple spatial scales, with an example from the Australian vascular flora. Journal of Biogeography 30, 511–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Greca, M. 1963. Le categorie corologiche degli elementi faunistici italiani. Atti Accademia Nazionale di Entomologia, Rendiconti 11, 231–263.
   Google Scholar
• La Greca, M. 1964. Le categorie corologiche degli elementi faunistici italiani. Memorie della Societa Entomologica Italiana 48, 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• La Greca, M. 1975. La caratterizzazione degli elementi faunistici e le categorie corologiche nella ricerca zoogeografica. Animalia 2, 101–129.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, H.P. 2001. On areas of endemism, with an example from the African Restionaceae. Systematic Biology 50, 892–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomolino, M.V., Riddle, B.R., Whittaker, R.J. & Brown, J.H. 2006. Biogeography, 4th edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• MagallÓn, S.A. 2004. Dating lineages: molecular and paleontological approaches to the temporal framework of clades. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165, S7–S21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. 2014. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Available from: http://www.merriam-webster.com (accessed 3 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.D. 2002. Integrative pluralism. Biology and Philosophy 17, 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.D. & Dietrich M.R. 2006. Integration without unification: an argument for pluralism in the biological sciences. American Naturalist 168, S73–S79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 1994. On the identification of areas of endemism. Systematic Biology 43, 438–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 2001. Homology, biogeography and areas of endemism. Diversity and Distributions 7, 297–300.
   Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 2005. Hacia una síntesis biogeográfica de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76, 207–252.
   Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 2007. Hacia una biogeografía evolutiva. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 80, 509–520.
   Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 2009. Evolutionary Biogeography: An Integrative Approach with Case Studies. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 2012. Biogeography. In: Craig, R.K., Pardy, B., Nagle, J.C., Schmitz, O. & Smith, W., Eds., The Berkshire Encyclopedia of Sustainability: Vol. 5. Ecosystem Management and Sustainability, Berkshire Publishing, Great Barrington, MA, USA, pp. 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P. 1973. The Dispersal Centres of Terrestrial Vertebrates in the Neotropical realm: A Study in the Evolution of the Neotropical Biota and its Native Landscapes. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. & Platnick, N.I. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, E.C. 1952. The evolution of a Permian vertebrate chronofauna. Evolution 6, 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parenti, L.R. & Ebach, M.C. 2009. Comparative Biogeography: Discovering and Classifying Biogeographical Patterns of a Dynamic Earth. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Penev, L. 1997. Concrete biotas – a neglected concept in biogeography? Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6, 91–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platnick, N.I. 1991. On areas of endemism. Australian Systematic Botany 4, xi–xii.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano-abril, M.A., Callejas-posada, R. & Miranda-esquivel, D.R. 2006. Areas of endemism and distribution patterns for Neotropical Piper species (Piperaceae). Journal of Biogeography 33, 1266–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reig, O.A. 1962. Las integraciones cenogenéticas en el desarrollo de la fauna de vertebrados tetrápodos de América del Sur. Ameghiniana 2, 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Reig, O.A. 1981. Teoría del origen y desarrollo de la fauna de mamíferos de América del Sur. Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales Lorenzo Scaglia, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Ringuelet, R.A. 1957. Biogeografía de los arácnidos argentinos del orden Opiliones. Contribuciones Científicas de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Serie Zoología 1, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ringuelet, R.A. 1961. Rasgos fundamentales de la zoogeografía de la Argentina. Physis 22, 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Roig-juñent, S. 1992. Insectos de América del Sur, su origen a través del enfoque de la biogeografía histórica. Multequina 1, 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, B.R. 1988. From fossils to earth history: applied historical biogeography. In: Myers, A.A. & Giller, P.S., Eds., Analytical Biogeography: An Integrated Approach to the Study of Animal and Plant Distributions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 437–481.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, B.R. 1992. Empiricism and the biogeographical black box: concepts and methods in marine biogeography. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology 92, 171–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, B.R. & Smith, A.B. 1988. Tectonics from fossils? Analysis of reef-coral and sea-urchin distributions from late Cretaceous to Recent, using a new method. In: Audley-Charles, M.G. & Hallam, A., Eds., Gondwana and Tethys. Geological Society Special Publication No. 37. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 275–306.
   Google Scholar
• Salthe, S.N. 1985. Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sans-fuentes, M.A. & Ventura, J. 2000. Distribution patterns of the small mammals (Insectivora and Rodentia) in a transitional zone between the Eurosiberian and the Mediterranean regions. Journal of Biogeography 27, 755–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, J.M. 1973. The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions. In: Vial, J.L., Ed., Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. University of Missouri Press, CO, USA, pp. 351–445.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, J.M. 1974. The Isthmian link and the evolution of Neotropical mammals. Contributions in Science of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 260, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, J.M. 1982. The enigma of the Central American herpetofauna: dispersals or vicariance? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69, 464–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. 1949. Herpetogeny in Mexico and Guatemala. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 39, 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szumik, C.A. & Goloboff, P. 2004. Areas of endemism: an improved optimality criterion. Systematic Biology 53, 968–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmachev, A.I. 1931. On the methods of comparative floristic investigations. 1. On the term ‘flora’ in the comparative floristics. Zhurnal Russkago Botanicheskago Obshchestva 16, 1–124 [in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Vigna Taglianti, A., Audisio, P.A., Biondi, M., Bologna, M.A., Carpaneto, G.M., De Biase, A., Fattorini, S., Piattella, E., Sindaco, R., Venchi, A. & Zapparoli M. 1999. A proposal for a chorotype classification of the Near East fauna, in the framework of the Western Palearctic region. Biogeographia 20, 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPeek, M.A. & Donoghue, M.J. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3, 475–505.
   Google Scholar
• White, F. 1978. The Afromontane region. In: Werger, M.J.A., Ed., Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, the Netherlands, pp. 463–513.
   Google Scholar
• White, F. 1983. The Vegetation of Africa. Natural Resources Research, UNESCO, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Zunino, M. 2005. Corotipos y biogeografía sistemática en el Euromediterráneo. In: Llorente Bousquets, J. & Morrone, J.J., Eds., Regionalización biogeográfica en Iberoamérica y tópicos afines: Primeras Jornadas Biogeográficas de la Red Iberoamericana de Biogeografía y Entomología Sistemática (RIBES XII.I-CYTED). Las Prensas de Ciencias, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 181–187.
   Google Scholar