In search of phylogenetic congruence between molecular and morphological data in bryozoans with extreme adult skeletal heteromorphy

References

• Blackwell, M., Henk, D. A., & Jones, K. G. (2003). Extreme morphological divergence: phylogenetic position of a tremite ectoparasite. Mycologia, 95, 987–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blainville, H. M. D. de (1830). Zoophytes. Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 60, 1–631.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, R. S. (1984). Origin of the Post-Triassic Stenolaemata (Bryozoa): a taxonomic oversight. Journal of Paleontology, 58, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, R. S. (1998). Reflections on the morphology, anatomy, evolution, and classification of the Class Stenolaemata (Bryozoa). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 86, 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, R. S., McKinney, F. K., & Taylor, P. D. (1992). Morphology, anatomy, and systematics of the Cinctiporidae, new family (Bryozoa: Stenolaemata). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 70, 1–81.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, P. E., & Gordon, D. P. (2013). Phylum Bryozoa Ehrenberg, 1831. Zootaxa, 3703, 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, F. (1926). Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala, 10, 181–507.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, F. (1933). A revision of the Recent Heteroporidae (Bryozoa). Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala, 14, 253–394.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, F. (1944) The Stenolaematous Bryozoa. In S. Bock (Ed.), Further Zoological Results of The Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901-1903 (pp. 1–276). Stockholm: Norstedt and Söner.
   Google Scholar
• Bourret, A., McPeek, M. A., & Turgeon, J. (2012). Regional divergence and mosaic spatial distribution of two closely related damselfly species (Enallagma hageni and Enallagma ebrium). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 196–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brood, K. (1976). Note on the bryozoan Pustulopora (Diaperoecia) intricaria Busk, 1875. Zoologica Scripta, 5, 231–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busk, G. (1859). A monograph of the fossil Polyzoa of the Crag. London: Palaeontographical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Busk, G. (1875). Catalogue of the Marine Polyzoa in the Collection of the British Museum. Part III. Cyclostomata. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Busk, G. (1879). On Recent species of Heteropora. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 14, 724–726.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, F. (1917). Etudes sur les ovicelles des Bryozoaires Cyclostomes. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 17, 345–347.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, F. (1918). Les ovicelles des Bryozoaires Cyclostomes. Etudes sur quelques familles nouvelles et anciennes. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 16, 324–335.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, M. H., Tilbrook, K. J., & Mawatari, S. F. (2006). Diversity and taxonomy of rocky-intertidal Bryozoa on the Island of Hawaii. Journal of Natural History, 40, 2197–2257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, A., Taylor, P. D., & Bohatý, J. (2014). A new Middle Devonian cystoporate bryozoan from Germany containing a new symbiont bioclaustration. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 59, 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. D. (1979). Morphology and function of zooecial spines in cyclostome Bryozoa: implications for paleobiology. In G. P. Larwood, & M. B. Abbott (Eds.), Advances in Bryozoology (pp. 219–246). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfuss, G. A. (1826). Petrefacta Germaniae, Abbildung und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der angreuzenden Länder. Teil 1. Dusseldorf: Arnz & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. P. (1967). A report on the ectoproct Polyzoa of some Auckland shores. Tane (Journal of the Auckland University Field Club), 13, 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. P. (1975). The resemblance of bryozoan gizzard teeth to “annelid-like” setae. Acta Zoologica, 56, 283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. P., Taylor, P. D., & Bigey, F. P. (2009). Phylum Bryozoa - moss animals, sea mats, lace corals. In D. P. Gordon (Ed.), The New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity.Volume 1. Kingdom Animalia - Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, and Deuterostomia (pp. 271–297). Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenow, F. von. (1851). Die Bryozoen der Maastrichter Kreidebildung (pp. 106), Cassel: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Harmelin, J.-G. (1976). Le sous-ordre des Tubuliporina (Bryozoaires Cyclostomes) en Méditerranée. Memoires de l'Institut Oceanographique, Monaco, 10, 1–326.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer, S. F. (1915). The Polyzoa of the Siboga Expedition. Part 1. Entoprocta, Ctenostomata and Cyclostomata. Siboga-Expeditie, 28a, 1–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, P. J., & Ryland, J. S. (1985). Systematic notes on some British Cyclostomata (Bryozoa). Journal of Natural History, 19, 1073–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Cubilla, A., & Jackson, J. B. C. (2014). Phylogeny of genus Cupuladria (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) in the Neogene of tropical America. Journal of Paleontology, 88, 851–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, D. M., & Dixon, M. T. (1991). Ribosomal DNA-Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference. Quarterly Review of Biology, 66, 411–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17, 754–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.N., Gómez, A., Wright, P. J., Moyano, H. I., Cancinao, J. M., Cravalho, G. R., & Lunt, D. H. (2008). Molecular phylogeny supports division of the ‘cosmopolitan’ taxon Celleporella (Bryozoa; Cheilostomata) into four major clades. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46, 369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, F. W. (1877). Corrections and additions to the list of Polyzoa in the Catalogue of Marine Mollusca of New Zealand (1873). Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 9, 358–361.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, F. W. (1880). Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca. Wellington: James Hughes.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, F. W. (1891). Revised list of the marine Bryozoa of New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 23, 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. L., & Taylor, P. D. (2014). New or poorly known skeletal features in the early astogeny of some cyclostome bryozoans. Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, 94, 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, G. (1847). A history of the British Zoophytes. 2nd Edition. London: John van Voorst.
   Google Scholar
• Lamouroux, J. (1821). Exposition méthodique des genres de l'ordre des Polypiers. Paris: Agasse.
   Google Scholar
• MacGillivray, P. H. (1883). Descriptions of new or little-known Polyzoa, Part 4. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 19, 287–293.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, J. B., & Ryland, J. S. (1987). Function of the gizzard in Bryozoa. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 107, 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne Edwards, H. (1838). Mémoire sur les Crisies, les Hornères et plusieurs autres Polypes vivants ou fossils don't l'organisation est analogue à celle des Tubulipores. Annales des Sciences naturelles, Zoologie et Biologie animale, Série 2, 9, 193–238.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, J., & Miller, M. (1968) The New Zealand Sea Shore. Auckland: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, H. A. (1880). On the minute structure of the Recent Heteropora neozelanica, Busk, and on the relations of the genus Heteropora to Monticulipora. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 6, 329–339, 414–423.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, O. B. Jr. (1976). Generic revision and skeletal morphology of some cerioporid cyclostomes (Bryozoa). Bulletins of American Paleontology, 69, 1–222.
   Google Scholar
• Orbigny, A. D. d' (1835–47). Voyage dans l'Amérique méridionale … execute pendant … 1826–33 par A. D. d'Orbigny, &c. Paris: P. Bertrand, Vol. + Atlas, 2 Vols. [Zoophytes in Vol. 5 (4), pp. 7–28, pls 1–13. Text, pp. 7–28, Livr. 89 (1847); pls 1, 3, 5, Livr. 56 (1841); pls 2, 6–8, Livr. 57 (1842); pls 4, 9, 10, 12, 13, Livr. 58 (1842); pl. 11, Livr. 59 (1842).]
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, F. (2011). Discordant patterns of morphological and genetic divergence in the closely related species Schizanthus hookeri and S. grahamii (Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 293, 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada, D., & Crandall, K.A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenstedt, F. A. (1881). Atlas zu den Röhren- und Sternkorallen ( pls., pp. 155–184). Leipzig: Fues's Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. R. P. (1973). Calcification in the colonial stenolaemate, Heteropora. In G. P. Larwood (Ed.), Living and Fossil Bryozoa (pp. 475–483). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryland, J. S. (1982). Bryozoa. In S. P. Parker (Ed.), Synopsis and classification of living organisms (pp. 743–769). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, P. (1986). On the gizzard in the bryozoan genus Diaperoecia Canu (Order Tubuliporata). Senckenbergiana Maritima, 17, 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Schopf, T. J. M., Collier, K. O., & Bach, B. O. (1980). Relation of the morphology of stick-like bryozoans to bottom currents and suspended matter and depth at Friday Harbor, Washington, Paleobiology, 6, 466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. M., & Gordon, D. P. (2011). Bryozoans of southern New Zealand: a field identification guide. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report, 75, 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sotiaux, A., Enroth, J., Olsson, S., Quandt, D., & Vanderpoorten, A. (2009). When morphology and molecules tell us different stories: a case-in- point with Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique endemic moss species from Corsica. Journal of Bryology, 31, 186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoliczka, F. (1865). Fossile Bryozoen aus dem Tertiären Grünsandsteine der Orakei-Bay bei Auckland. Reise der Osterreichischen Fregatte “Novara” um die Erde in der Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859. Geologischer Theil, 1, 89–158.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D. (2000). Cyclostome systematics: phylogeny, suborders and the problem of skeletal organization. In A. Herrera Cubilla, & J. B. C. Jackson (Eds), Proceedings of the 11th International Bryozoology Association Conference (pp. 87–103). Balboa Republic of Panama: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., & Gordon, D. P. (2003). Endemic new cyclostome bryozoans from Spirits Bay, a New Zealand marine-biodiversity “hotspot.” New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 37, 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., & McKinney, F. K. (2006). Cretaceous Bryozoa from the Campanian and Maastrichtian of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains, United States. Scripta Geologica, 132, 1–346.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., Gordon, D. P., & Batson, P. B. (2004). Bathymetric distributions of modern populations of some common Cenozoic Bryozoa from New Zealand, and paleodepth estimation. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 47, 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., Kuklinski, P., & Gordon, D. P. (2007). Branch diameter and depositional depth in cyclostome bryozoans: testing a potential paleobathymetric tool. Palaios, 22, 220–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., & Weedon, M. J. (2000). Skeletal ultrastructure and phylogeny of cyclostome bryozoans. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 128, 337–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., Waeschenbach, A., & Florence, W. (2011). Phylogenetic position and systematics of the bryozoan Tennysonia: further evidence for convergence and plasticity in skeletal morphology among cyclostome bryozoans. Zootaxa, 3010, 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. D., Lombardi, C., & Cocito, S. (2014). Biomineralization in bryozoans: present, past and future. Biological Reviews, doi 10.1111/brv.12148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viskova, L. V. (1992). Morskie Postpaleozoyskie Mshanki. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 250, 1–187.
   Google Scholar
• Waeschenbach, A., Cox, C. C., Littlewood, D. T. J., Porter, J. S., & Taylor, P. D. (2009). First molecular estimate of cyclostome bryozoan phylogeny confirms extensive homoplasy among skeletal characters used in traditional taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52, 241–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waeschenbach, A., Taylor, P. D., & Littlewood, D. T. J. (2012). A molecular phylogeny of bryozoans. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 62, 718–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, B. (1970). Les Bryozoaires Jurassiques en France. Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon, 35, 1–328.
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, M. J. (1998). Skeletal ultrastructure of the early astogenetic stages of some cyclostome bryozoans. Acta Zoologica, 79, 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedon, M. J., & Taylor, P. D. (1996). Skeletal ultrastructures in some cerioporine cyclostome bryozoans. Acta Zoologica, 77, 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten, R. F. (1979). Systematics and ecology of northern Hauraki Gulf Bryozoa (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar