Are all Mexican odonate species documented? An assessment of species richness

References

• Bailowitz, R., Danforth, D., & Upson, S. (2013). Erpetogomphus molossus, a new species from Sonora, Mexico (Odonata: Anisoptera: Gomphidae). Zootaxa, 3734, 559–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley University Museum of Zoology. (2015). Retrieved from: http://essig.berkeley.edu/resources/collection_databases.shtml (accessed 10 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bried, J.T., & Mazzacano, C. A. (2010). National review of state wildlife action plans for Odonata species of greatest conservation need. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 3, 61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, P., Erwin, T. L., Borges, P. A. V., & New, T. R. (2011). The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation, 144, 2647–2655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G. (2007). Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: The efficiency of reserve networks. Ecological Applications, 17, 569–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Hsieh, T. C., Sander, E. L., Ma, K. H., Colwell, R. K., & Ellison, A. M. (2014). Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: A framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecological Monographs, 84, 45–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, A., & Jost, L. (2012). Coverage–based rarefaction and extrapolation: Standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93, 2533–2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, A., & Lee, S. M. (1992). Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 210–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, S. D., & McIntyre, N. E. (2015). Modeling the distribution of odonates: A review. Freshwater Science, 34, 1144–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, R. K. (2013). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0. User's Guide. Retrieved from: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, R. K., Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Lin, S. Y., Mao, C. X., Chazdon, R. L., & Longino, J. T. (2012). Models and estimators linking individual–based and sample–based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. Journal of Plant Ecology, 5, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONABIO. (2000). Estrategia Nacional sobre Biodiversidad de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico. Retrieved from: http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/pais/ENBM.html (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• CONABIO. (2015). Portal de geoinformación. Sistema Nacional de Información sobre biodiversidad. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico. Retrieved from: http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis (accessed 17 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas–Yáñez, K. (2016). Estudios sobre conservación del género Paraphlebia en México. Doctoral thesis. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 68 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas–Yáñez, K., Rivas, M., Muñoz, J., & Córdoba–Aguilar, A. (2015). Conservation status assessment of Paraphlebia damselflies in Mexico. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 8, 517–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirzo, R., & Raven, P.H., (1994). Un inventario biológico para México. Sociedad Botánica, 55, 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• El Charco del Ingenio. (2015). El Charco del Ingenio, Jardín Botánico, Reserva Natural, San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato, México. Retrieved from: http://elcharco.org.mx/listado_libelulas.html (accessed 15 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Feria, T. P., Olson, M., García–Mendoza, A., & Solano, E. (2009). A GIS–based comparison of the Mexican National and IUCN methods for determining extinction risk. Conservation Biology, 23, 1156–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, R. W., & von Ellenrieder, N. (2016). A synonymic list of the New World Odonata. Retrieved from: http://www.odonatacentral.org/views/pdfs/NWOL.pdf (accessed 15 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• GBIF (2015). Global biodiversity information facility. Retrieved from: http://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 12 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• González–Soriano, E., & Novelo–Gutiérrez, R., (2007). Odonata of Mexico: Revisited. In B. K. Tyagi (Ed.), Odonata: Biology of Dragonflies (pp. 105–136). India: Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• González–Soriano, E., & Novelo–Gutiérrez, R. (2014). Biodiversidad de Odonata en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85, 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassall, C. (2015). Odonata as candidate macroecological barometers for global climate change. Freshwater Science, 34, 1040–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickling, R., Roy, D. B., Hill, J. K., & Thomas, C. D. (2005). A northward shift of range margins in British Odonata. Global Change Biology, 3, 502–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H., & Chao, A. (2014). iNEXT: An R package for interpolation and extrapolation in measuring species diversity. Retrieved from: http://glimmer.rstudio.com/tchsieh/inext/ (accessed on 18 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• IUCN (2015). IUCN red list of threatened species. Retrieved from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed 15 January 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Lemelin, H. (2009). Goodwill hunting: Dragon hunters, dragonflies and leisure. Current Issues in Tourism, 12, 553–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorente–Bousquets, J. L., Michán–Aguirre, L., González–González, J., & Sosa–Ortega, V. (2008). Desarrollo y situación actual del conocimiento de las especies. In Capital Natural de México, vol.1: Conocimiento Actual de la Biodiversidad (pp. 193–214). México: CONABIO.
   Google Scholar
• Lot, A., & Cano–Santana, Z. (2009). Biodiversidad del Ecosistema del Pedregal de San Ángel. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coordinación de la Investigación Científica, 538 p.
   Google Scholar
• Mittermeier, R., & Goettsch, C. (1992). La importancia de la diversidad biológica de México. In J. Sarukhán, & R. Dirzo (Eds.), México ante los retos de la biodiversidad. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (pp. 43–55). México: CONABIO.
   Google Scholar
• Odonata Central. (2016). Retrieved from: http://odonatacentral.bfl.utexas.edu/ (accessed 18 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Simaika, J. P., & Samways, M. J. (2008). Valuing dragonflies as service providers. In A. Córdoba–Aguilar (Ed.), Dragonflies and Damselflies: Model Organisms for Ecological and Evolutionary Research (pp. 109–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simaika, J. P., & Samways, M. J. (2015). Predicted range shifts of dragonflies over a wide elevation gradient in the southern hemisphere. Freshwater Science, 34, 1133–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simaika, J. P., Samways, M. J., Kipping, J., Suhling, F., Dijkstra, K. D. B., Clausnitzer, V., … Donisch, S. (2013). Continental–scale conservation prioritization of African dragonflies. Biological Conservation, 157, 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithsonian Museum (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.si.edu/ (accessed 14 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Suhling, F., Sahlen, G., Gorb, S., Kalkman, V. J., Dijkstra, K. D. B., & van Tol, J. (2015). Order Odonata. In J. Thorp, & D. C. Rogers (Eds.), Ecology and General Biology. Thorp and Covich's Freshwater Invertebrates (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 893–932). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, E. L., Hunt, P. D., Schlesinger, M. D., Corser, J. D., & deMaynadier, P. G. (2015). Prioritizing Odonata for conservation action in the northeastern USA. Freshwater Science, 34, 1079–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar