The future of zoological taxonomy is integrative, not minimalist

References

• Abdala, C. S., Paz, M. M., Semhan, R. V., García, N., Aguilar-Kirigin, A. J., Farías, M. E., Valladares, P., Poblete, R. G., Quipildor, M. A., Valdes, J., & Langstroth, R. (2021). Increasing knowledge of the denizens of saline environments through integrative taxonomy: New Argentinian endemic taxa of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) and their evolutionary relationships. Systematics and Biodiversity, 19, 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1844818
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. Z., Araujo-Jnr, E. V., Welch, J. J., & Kawahara, A. Y. (2015). Wolbachia in butterflies and moths: Geographic structure in infection frequency. Frontiers in Zoology, 12, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-015-0107-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, D., Ahyong, S. T., Ballerio, A., Barclay, M., Eberle, J., Espeland, M., Huber, B. A., Mengual, X., Pacheco, T. L., Peters, R., Rulik, B., Vaz-de-Mello, F., Wesener, T., & Krell, F.-T. (2021). Is it time to describe new species without diagnoses? A comment on Sharkey et al., (2021). Zootaxa, 5027, 151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, M. J., Gante, H., Veríssimo, A., Ribeiro, F., Santos, C. D., & Jentoft, S. (2019). From rare species detection to whole-community diversity using high-throughput sequencing of freshwater eDNA. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3, e37975. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37975
   Google Scholar
• Arthofer, W., Rauch, H., Thaler-Knoflach, B., Moder, K., Muster, C., Schlick-Steiner, B. C., & Steiner, F. M. (2013). How diverse is Mitopus morio? Integrative taxonomy detects cryptic species in a small-scale sample of a widespread harvestman. Molecular Ecology, 22, 3850–3863. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, J. E., Godwin, R. L., Colby, J. D., Newton, L. G., Zahnle, X. J., Agnarsson, I., Hamilton, C. A., & Kuntner, M. (2021). Improving Taxonomic Practices and Enhancing Its Extensibility—An Example from Araneology. Diversity, 14, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010005
   Google Scholar
• Brasero, N., Martinet, B., Michez, D., Lecocq, T., Valterova, I., & Rasmont, P. (2020). Taxonomic revision of the Sylvarum group of bumblebees using an integrative approach. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1737843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brawand, D., Wagner, C. E., Li, Y. I., Malinsky, M., Keller, I., Fan, S., Simakov, O., Ng, A. Y., Lim, Z. W., Bezault, E., Turner-Maier, J., Johnson, J., Alcazar, R., Noh, H. J., Russell, P., Aken, B., Alföldi, J., Amemiya, C., Azzouzi, N., … Di Palma, F. (2014). The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish. Nature, 513, 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breman, F. C., Loix, S., Jordaens, K., Snoeks, J., & Van Steenberge, M. (2016). Testing the potential of DNA barcoding in vertebrate radiations: The case of the littoral cichlids (Pisces, Perciformes, Cichlidae) from Lake Tanganyika. Molecular Ecology Resources, 16, 1455–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, E., Mayer, C., Twort, V., Dietz, L., Wahlberg, N., & Espeland, M. (2021). Museomics: Phylogenomics of the moth family Epicopeiidae (Lepidoptera) using target enrichment. Insect Systematics and Diversity, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixaa021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstens, B. C., Pelletier, T. A., Reid, N. M., & Satler, J. D. (2013). How to fail at species delimitation. Molecular Ecology, 22, 4369–4383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S., Brandão, C., Vivo, M., Figueiredo, J. L., Britski, H. A., Pinna, M., Menezes, N. A., Marques, F., Papavero, N., Cancello, E. M., Crisci, J. V., McEachran, J. D., Schelly, R. S., Lundberg, J. G., Gill, A. G., Britz, R., Wheeler, Q. D., … Nelson, G. J. (2007). Taxonomic impediment or impediment to taxonomy? A commentary on systematics and the cybertaxonomic-automation paradigm. Evolutionary Biology, 34, 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, E. A., & Hillis, D. M. (2020). The multispecies coalescent over-splits species in the case of geographically widespread taxa. Systematic Biology, 69, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, K., Sumner, J., Hipsley, C. A., & Melville, J. (2020). An integrative approach using phylogenomics and high-resolution x-ray computed tomography for species delimitation in cryptic taxa. Systematic Biology, 69, 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, W., & Katz, A. M. (2021). Integrative taxonomy supports high species diversity of south-eastern Brazilian mountain catfishes of the T. reinhardti group (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae). Systematics and Biodiversity, 19, 601–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1900947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Pos, D., & Rousse, P. (2018). First record of the genus Genaemirum (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae) from West Africa, with the description of a new species from Guinea. European Journal of Taxonomy, 473, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayrat, B. (2005). Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 85, 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ercole, J., Dincă, V., Opler, P. A., Kondla, N., Schmidt, C., Phillips, J. D., Robbins, R., Burns, J. M., Miller, S. E., Grishin, N., Zakharov, E. V., DeWaard, J. R., Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2021). A DNA barcode library for the butterflies of North America. PeerJ, 9, e11157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle, R., Egan, M. G., & Siddall, M. (2005). The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1905–1916. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giovanni, F., & Reshchikov, A. (2016). Contribution to the knowledge of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) in Italy. Linzer Biologische Beitraege, 48, 495–505.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giovanni, F., Reshchikov, A., Riedel, M., Diller, E., & Schwarz, M. (2015). New records of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) for the Italian fauna. Biodiversity Data Journal, 3, e5057. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giovanni, F., Scaramozzino, P. L., & Diller, E. (2018). A new species of Misetus Wesmael, 1845 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae, Phaeogenini) from Italy, with updated key to the females of Palaearctic species. Zootaxa, 4374, 594–600. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4374.4.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincă, V., Dapporto, L., Somervuo, P., Vodă, R., Cuvelier, S., Gascoigne-Pees, M., Huemer, P., Mutanen, M., Hebert, P. D., & Vila, R. (2021). High resolution DNA barcode library for European butterflies reveals continental patterns of mitochondrial genetic diversity. Communications Biology, 4, 315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01834-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincă, V., Montagud, S., Talavera, G., Hernández-Roldán, J., Munguira, M. L., García-Barros, E., Hebert, P. D., & Vila, R. (2015). DNA barcode reference library for Iberian butterflies enables a continental-scale preview of potential cryptic diversity. Scientific Reports, 5, 12395. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincă, V., Lee, K. M., Vila, R., & Mutanen, M. (2019). The conundrum of species delimitation: A genomic perspective on a mitogenetically super-variable butterfly [Paper presentation].Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286, 20191311.
   Google Scholar
• Dincă, V., Zakharov, E. V., Hebert, P. D., & Vila, R. (2011). Complete DNA barcode reference library for a country's butterfly fauna reveals high performance for temperate Europe [Paper presentation].Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 347–355.
   Google Scholar
• Dowton, M., Meiklejohn, K., Cameron, S. L., & Wallman, J. (2014). A preliminary framework for DNA barcoding, incorporating the multispecies coalescent. Systematic Biology, 63, 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupérré, N. (2020). Old and new challenges in taxonomy: What are taxonomists up against? Megataxa, 1, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.12
   Google Scholar
• Ebach, M. C., & Holdrege, C. (2005). DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature, 434, 697. https://doi.org/10.1038/434697b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebach, M. C., Valdecasas, A. G., & Wheeler, Q. D. (2011). Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: Accessibility and impact evaluation. Cladistics: The International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society, 27, 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00348.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. L., & Knowles, L. L. (2014). Species detection and individual assignment in species delimitation: Can integrative data increase efficacy? Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 281, 20132765. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, M. S., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Daniel, G. M., Dellapé, P. M., Löbl, I., Marinov, M., Reis, R. E., Young, M. T., Dubois, A., Agarwal, I., Lehmann A, P., Alvarado, M., Alvarez, N., Andreone, F., Araujo-Vieira, K., Ascher, J. S., Baêta, D., Baldo, D., Bandeira, S. A., … Zacharie, C. K. (2021). The taxonomic impediment: A shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 193, 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erpenbeck, D., Ekins, M., Enghuber, N., Hooper, J., Lehnert, H., Poliseno, A., Schuster, A., Setiawan, E., De Voogd, N. J., Wörheide, G., & Van Soest, R. (2016). Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 96, 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415000521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B. J., Gansauge, M.-T., Stanley, E. L., Furman, B., Cauret, C., Ofori-Boateng, C., Gvoždík, V., Streicher, J. W., Greenbaum, E., Tinsley, R. C., Meyer, M., & Blackburn, D. C. (2019). Xenopus fraseri: Mr. Fraser, where did your frog come from? PloS One, 14, 14, e0220892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feliciano, K., Malaquias, M., Stout, C., Brenzinger, B., Gosliner, T. M., & Valdés, A. (2021). Molecular and morphological analyses reveal pseudocryptic diversity in Micromelo undatus (Bruguière, 1792) (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Aplustridae). Systematics and Biodiversity, 19, 834–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1939458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Triana, J. L. (2022). Turbo taxonomy approaches: Lessons from the past and recommendations for the future based on the experience with Braconidae (Hymenoptera) parasitoid wasps. ZooKeys, 1087, 199–220. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1087.76720
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Funk, D. J., & Omland, K. E. (2003). Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gante, H. F., Matschiner, M., Malmstrøm, M., Jakobsen, K. S., Jentoft, S., & Salzburger, W. (2016). Genomics of speciation and introgression in Princess cichlid fishes from Lake Tanganyika. Molecular Ecology, 25, 6143–6161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gante, H. F., & Salzburger, W. (2012). Evolution: Cichlid models on the runaway to speciation. Current Biology: CB, 22, R956–R958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaston, K. J., & O'Neill, M. A. (2004). Automated species identification: Why not? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunet, A., Dincă, V., Dapporto, L., Montagud, S., Vodă, R., Schär, S., Badiane, A., Font, E., & Vila, R. (2019). Two consecutive Wolbachia-mediated mitochondrial introgressions obscure taxonomy in Palearctic swallowtail butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Zoologica Scripta, 48, 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebiola, M., Gómez-Zurita, J., Monti, M. M., Navone, P., & Bernardo, U. (2012). Integration of molecular, ecological, morphological and endosymbiont data for species delimitation within the Pnigalio soemius complex (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Molecular Ecology, 21, 1190–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05428.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M., Koblmüller, S., Assandri, G., Chovanec, A., Ekrem, T., Fischer, I., Galimberti, A., Grabowski, M., Haring, E., Hausmann, A., Hendrich, L., Koch, S., Mamos, T., Rothe, U., Rulik, B., Rewicz, T., Sittenthaler, M., Stur, E., Tończyk, G., Zangl, L., & Moriniere, J. (2021). Coverage and quality of DNA barcode references for Central and Northern European Odonata. PeerJ, 9, e11192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, T. R. (2005). DNA barcoding does not compete with taxonomy. Nature, 434, 1067. https://doi.org/10.1038/4341067b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, A., Haszprunar, G., Segerer, A. H., Speidel, W., Behounek, G., & Hebert, P. D. (2011). Now DNA-barcoded: The butterflies and larger moths of Germany. Spixiana, 34, 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, P., & Barrett, R. (2005). Reply to the comment by L. Prendini on “Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 505–506. https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, P., & Gregory, T. R. (2005). The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, P., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., & Dewaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes [Paper presentation].Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 313–321.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, G. (1967). Synopsis and reclassification of the Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae of Africa south of Sahara (Hym.) (Vol. 1, pp. 250). Farmington State College Press..
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Roldán, J. L., Dapporto, L., Dincă, V., Vicente, J. C., Hornett, E. A., Šíchová, J., Lukhtanov, V. A., Talavera, G., & Vila, R. (2016). Integrative analyses unveil speciation linked to host plant shift in Spialia butterflies. Molecular Ecology, 25, 4267–4284. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, J. C., Koubínová, D., Szenteczki, M. A., Pitteloud, C., Dincă, V., Alvarez, N., & Vila, R. (2019). A mirage of cryptic species: Genomics uncover striking mitonuclear discordance in the butterfly Thymelicus sylvestris. Molecular Ecology, 28, 3857–3868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, T., Roininen, H., van Noort, S., Broad, G. R., Kaunisto, K., & Sääksjärvi, I. E. (2019). Extensive sampling and thorough taxonomic assessment of Afrotropical Rhyssinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) reveals two new species and demonstrates the limitations of previous sampling efforts. ZooKeys, 878, 33–71. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.878.37845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurst, G., & Jiggins, F. M. (2005). Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: The effects of inherited symbionts [Paper presentation].Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 1525–1534.
   Google Scholar
• ICZN (1999). International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (4th ed). International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, N. (2020). Additions to the Swedish fauna of Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) with the descriptions of five new species. European Journal of Taxonomy, 724, 70–92. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, A., Keceli, A. S., Catal, C., Yalic, H. Y., Temucin, H., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2019). Analysis of transfer learning for deep neural network based plant classification models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 158, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopfstein, S. (2014). Revision of the western palaearctic diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Zootaxa, 3801, 1–143. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3801.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopfstein, S., Santos, B. F., Shaw, M. R., Alvarado, M., Bennett, A., Dal Pos, D., Giannotta, M., Herrera, A., Karlsson, D., Khalaim, A. I., Lima, A. R., Mikó, I., Sääksjärvi, I. E., Shimizu, S., Spasojevic, T., van Noort, S., Vilhelmsen, L., & Broad, G. R. (2019). Darwin wasps: A new name heralds renewed efforts to unravel the evolutionary history of Ichneumonidae. Entomological Communications, 1, ec010. https://doi.org/10.37486/2675-1305.ec01006
   Google Scholar
• Kodandaramaiah, U., Simonsen, T. J., Bromilow, S., Wahlberg, N., & Sperling, F. (2013). Deceptive single-locus taxonomy and phylogeography: Wolbachia-associated divergence in mitochondrial DNA is not reflected in morphology and nuclear markers in a butterfly species. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 5167–5176. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, L. R., Bruschi, D. P., Nascimento, F., Araújo, P., Costa, L. P., Thomé, M., Garda, A. A., Zattera, M. L., & Mott, T. (2020). Below the waterline: Cryptic diversity of aquatic pipid frogs (Pipa carvalhoi) unveiled through an integrative taxonomy approach. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1795742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb, D., Platnick, N., & Wheeler, Q. (2003). The intellectual content of taxonomy: A comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00060-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, J., Chittaro, Y., Birrer, S., Praz, C., Wermeille, E., Fluri, M., Stalling, T., Schmid, S., Wyler, S., & Gonseth, Y. (2018). A DNA barcode reference library for Swiss butterflies and forester moths as a tool for species identification, systematics and conservation. PloS One, 13, e0208639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukhtanov, V. A., Sourakov, A., Zakharov, E. V., & Hebert, P. D. (2009). DNA barcoding Central Asian butterflies: Increasing geographical dimension does not significantly reduce the success of species identification. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 1302–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinsky, M., Svardal, H., Tyers, A. M., Miska, E. A., Genner, M. J., Turner, G. F., & Durbin, R. (2018). Whole-genome sequences of Malawi cichlids reveal multiple radiations interconnected by gene flow. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 1940–1955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0717-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, N. A., Fletcher, N. K., Gill, B. A., Funk, W. C., & Zamudio, K. R. (2020). Coalescent-based species delimitation is sensitive to geographic sampling and isolation by distance. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1730475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. A., Cotoras, D. D., O'Connell, B., Lawalata, S. Z. S., Wang-Claypool, C. Y., Stubbs, A., Huang, X., Wogan, G. O. U., Hykin, S. M., Reilly, S. B., Bi, K., Riyanto, A., Arida, E., Smith, L. L., Milne, H., Streicher, J. W., & Iskandar, D. T. (2018). Squeezing water from a stone: High-throughput sequencing from a 145-year old holotype resolves (barely) a cryptic species problem in flying lizards. PeerJ, 6, e4470. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, R. (2017). Citation of taxonomic publications: The why, when, what and what not. Systematic Entomology, 42, 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, R., Blaimer, B. B., Buenaventura, E., Hartop, E., von Rintelen, T., Srivathsan, A., & Yeo, D. (2022). A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.'s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science . Cladistics: The International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society, 38, 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, J. I., Marques, D., Mwaiko, S., Wagner, C. E., Excoffier, L., & Seehausen, O. (2017). Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations. Nature Communications, 8, 14363. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meierotto, S., Sharkey, M. J., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P. D., Chapman, E. G., & Smith, M. A. (2019). A revolutionary protocol to describe understudied hyperdiverse taxa and overcome the taxonomic impediment. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 66, 119–145. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.34683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A., & Worm, B. (2011). How many species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biology, 9, e1001127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, C., & Cicero, C. (2004). DNA barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biology, 2, e279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutanen, M., Kivelä, S. M., Vos, R. A., Doorenweerd, C., Ratnasingham, S., Hausmann, A., Huemer, P., Dincă, V., van Nieukerken, E. J., Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Vila, R., Aarvik, L., Decaëns, T., Efetov, K. A., Hebert, P. D., Johnsen, A., Karsholt, O., Pentinsaari, M., Rougerie, R., … Godfray, H. C. (2016). Species-level para- and polyphyly in DNA barcode gene trees: Strong operational bias in European Lepidoptera. Systematic Biology, 65, 1024–1040. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevado, B., Fazalova, V., Backeljau, T., Hanssens, M., & Verheyen, E. (2011). Repeated unidirectional introgression of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA between four congeneric Tanganyikan cichlids. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2253–2267. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, L. G., Starrett, J., Hendrixson, B. E., Derkarabetian, S., & Bond, J. E. (2020). Integrative species delimitation reveals cryptic diversity in the southern Appalachian Antrodiaetus unicolor (Araneae: Antrodiaetidae) species complex. Molecular Ecology, 29, 2269–2287. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novacek, M. J., & Wheeler, Q. D. (1992). Extinct taxa—accounting for 99.9990…% of the earth’s biota. In M. J. Novacek, & Q. D. Wheeler, (Eds.), Extinction and phylogeny (pp. 1–16). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olave, M., Solà, E., & Knowles, L. L. (2014). Upstream analyses create problems with DNA-based species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 63, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pante, E., Puillandre, N., Viricel, A., Arnaud, Haond, S., Aurelle, D., Castelin, M., Chenuil, A., Destombe, C., Forcioli, D., Valero, M., Viard, F., & Samadi, S. (2015). Species are hypotheses: Avoid connectivity assessments based on pillars of sand. Molecular Ecology, 24, 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakostas, S., Michaloudi, E., Proios, K., Brehm, M., Verhage, L., Rota, J., Peña, C., Stamou, G., Pritchard, V. L., Fontaneto, D., & Declerck, S. (2016). Integrative taxonomy recognizes evolutionary units despite widespread mitonuclear discordance: Evidence from a rotifer cryptic species complex. Systematic Biology, 65, 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, N. T., Matsumoto, R., Konishi, K., Sheng, M.-L., & Broad, G. R. (2020). A review of the genus Apophysius Cushman (Ichneumonidae: Phygadeuontinae), with descriptions of six new species. Zootaxa, 4802, 301–316. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4802.2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, H. T., Moreau, C. S., Daly, M., & Rocha, L. A. (2019). Will DNA barcoding meet taxonomic needs? Science (New York, N.Y.), 365, 873–874. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay7174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puillandre, N., Modica, M. V., Zhang, Y., Sirovich, L., Boisselier, M.-C., Cruaud, C., Holford, M., & Samadi, S. (2012). Large-scale species delimitation method for hyperdiverse groups. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2671–2691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05559.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancilhac, L., Bruy, T., Scherz, M. D., Pereira, E. A., Preick, M., Straube, N., Lyra, M., Ohler, A., Streicher, J. W., Andreone, F., Crottini, A., Hutter, C. R., Randrianantoandro, J. C., Rakotoarison, A., Glaw, F., Hofreiter, M., & Vences, M. (2020). Target-enriched DNA sequencing from historical type material enables a partial revision of the Madagascar giant stream frogs (genus Mantidactylus). Journal of Natural History, 54, 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1748243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. (2007). BOLD: The barcode of life data system (http://www.barcodinglife.org )). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, S., Michalski, S. G., Settele, J., Wiemers, M., Fric, Z. F., Sielezniew, M., Sasic, M., Rozier, Y., & Durka, W. (2013). Wolbachia infections mimic cryptic speciation in two parasitic butterfly species, Phengaris teleius and P. nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). PloS One, 8, e78107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronco, F., Büscher, H. H., Indermaur, A., & Salzburger, W. (2020). The taxonomic diversity of the cichlid fish fauna of ancient Lake Tanganyika, East Africa. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 46, 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2019.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronco, F., Matschiner, M., Böhne, A., Boila, A., Büscher, H. H., El Taher, A., Indermaur, A., Malinsky, M., Ricci, V., Kahmen, A., Jentoft, S., & Salzburger, W. (2021). Drivers and dynamics of a massive adaptive radiation in cichlid fishes. Nature, 589, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2930-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousse, P., Broad, G. R., & van Noort, S. (2016). Review of the genus Genaemirum Heinrich (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae) with interactive identification keys to species. ZooKeys, 636, 77–105.
   Google Scholar
• Rousse, P., & van Noort, S. (2014). A review of the Afrotropical Rhyssinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) with the descriptions of five new species. European Journal of Taxonomy, 91, 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousse, P., van Noort, S., & Diller, E. (2013). Revision of the Afrotropical Phaeogenini (Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae), with description of a new genus and twelve new species. ZooKeys, 354, 1–85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.354.5968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruane, S., & Austin, C. C. (2017). Phylogenomics using formalin-fixed and 100+ year-old intractable natural history specimens. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17, 1003–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherz, M. D., Rasolonjatovo, S. M., Köhler, J., Rancilhac, L., Rakotoarison, A., Raselimanana, A. P., Ohler, A., Preick, M., Hofreiter, M., Glaw, F., & Vences, M. (2020). 'Barcode fishing' for archival DNA from historical type material overcomes taxonomic hurdles, enabling the description of a new frog species. Scientific Reports, 10, 19109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75431-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seberg, O., Humphries, C. J., Knapp, S., Stevenson, D. W., Petersen, G., Scharff, N., & Andersen, M. (2003). Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selfa, J., & Diller, E. (1994). Illustrated Key to the Western Palearctic Genera of Phaeogenini (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae). Entomofauna, 15, 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, M. J., Brown, B., Baker, A., & Mutanen, M. (2021a). Response to Zamani et al. (2020): The omission of critical data in the pursuit of “revolutionary” methods to accelerate the description of species . ZooKeys, 1033, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1033.66186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharkey, M. J., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., Chapman, E. G., Smith, M. A., Dapkey, T., Brown, A., Ratnasingham, S., Naik, S., Manjunath, R., Perez, K., Milton, M., Hebert, P., Shaw, S. R., Kittel, R. N., Solis, M. A., Metz, M. A., Goldstein, P. Z., Brown, J. W., … Burns, J. M. (2021b). Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys, 1013, 1–665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Srivathsan, A., Lee, L., Katoh, K., Hartop, E., Kutty, S. N., Wong, J., Yeo, D., & Meier, R. (2021). ONTbarcoder and MinION barcodes aid biodiversity discovery and identification by everyone, for everyone. BMC Biology, 19, 217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01141-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stork, N. E. (1997). Measuring global biodiversity and its decline. In M. L. Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), Biodiversity II: Understanding and protecting our biological resources (pp. 41–48). Joseph Henry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straube, N., Lyra, M. L., Paijmans, J., Preick, M., Basler, N., Penner, J., Rödel, M.-O., Westbury, M. V., Haddad, C. F., Barlow, A., & Hofreiter, M. (2021a). Successful application of ancient DNA extraction and library construction protocols to museum wet collection specimens. Molecular Ecology Resources, 21, 2299–2315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straube, N., Preick, M., Naylor, G., & Hofreiter, M. (2021b). Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of a wet-collection syntype demonstrates the importance of type material as genetic resource for lantern shark taxonomy (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae). Royal Society Open Science, 8, 210474. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucháčková Bartoňová, A., Konvička, M., Marešová, J., Wiemers, M., Ignatev, N., Wahlberg, N., Schmitt, T., & Fric, Z. F. (2021). Wolbachia affects mitochondrial population structure in two systems of closely related Palaearctic blue butterflies. Scientific Reports, 11, 3019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82433-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taberlet, P., Bonin, A., Zinger, L., & Coissac, E. (2018). Environmental DNA: For biodiversity research and monitoring. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tereshkin, A. M. (2009). Illustrated key to the tribes of subfamilia Ichneumoninae and genera of the tribe Platylabini of world fauna (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Linzer Biologische Beitraege, 41, 1317–1608.
   Google Scholar
• Toews, D., & Brelsford, A. (2012). The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3907–3930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, J. P., Varga, Z., Verovnik, R., Wahlberg, N., Váradi, A., & Bereczki, J. (2017). Mito-nuclear discordance helps to reveal the phylogeographic patterns of Melitaea ornata (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 121, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valan, M., Makonyi, K., Maki, A., Vondráček, D., & Ronquist, F. (2019). Automated taxonomic identification of insects with expert-level accuracy using effective feature transfer from convolutional networks. Systematic Biology, 68, 876–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, O. (2020). First record of Epirhyssa Cresson, 1865 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Rhyssinae) from Kenya. Zootaxa, 4852, zootaxa.4852.5.9–593. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4852.5.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vences, M., Köhler, J., Andreone, F., Craul, A.-K., Crottini, A., du Preez, L., Preick, M., Rancilhac, L., Rödel, M.-O., Scherz, M. D., Streicher, J. W., Hofreiter, M., & Glaw, F. (2021b). Target-enriched DNA sequencing clarifies the identity of name-bearing types of the Gephyromantis plicifer complex and reveals a new species of mantellid frog from Madagascar (Amphibia, Anura). Spixiana, 44, 175–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vences, M., Miralles, A., Brouillet, S., Ducasse, J., Fedosov, A., Kharchev, V., Kostadinov, I., Kumari, S., Patmanidis, S., Scherz, M. D., Puillandre, N., & Renner, S. S. (2021a). iTaxoTools 0.1: Kickstarting a specimen-based software toolkit for taxonomists. Megataxa, 6, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.6.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Vieites, D. R., Wollenberg, K. C., Andreone, F., Köhler, J., Glaw, F., & Vences, M. (2009). Vast underestimation of Madagascar's biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 8267–8272.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, G. A., Muster, C., Arthofer, W., Raspotnig, G., Föttinger, P., Komposch, C., Steiner, F. M., & Schlick-Steiner, B. C. (2015). Taking the discovery approach in integrative taxonomy: Decrypting a complex of narrow-endemic Alpine harvestmen (Opiliones: Phalangiidae: Megabunus). Molecular Ecology, 24, 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, J., Peart, R. A., & Jamieson, A. J. (2020). Amphipods from the Wallaby-Zenith Fracture Zone, Indian Ocean: New genus and two new species identified by integrative taxonomy. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1729891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheat, C. W., & Watt, W. B. (2008). A mitochondrial-DNA-based phylogeny for some evolutionary-genetic model species of Colias butterflies (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 47, 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Q. (2018). Blank Canvas: The case for descriptive taxonomy. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58, 1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheeler, Q. D. (2008). Undisciplined thinking: Morphology and Henning’s unfinished revolution. Systematic Entomology, 33, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Q. D. (2009). Revolutionary thoughts on taxonomy: Declarations of independence and interdependence. Zoologia (Curitiba), 26, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702009000100001
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Q. D., Raven, P. H., & Wilson, E. O. (2004). Taxonomy: Impediment or expedient? Science (New York, N.Y.), 303, 285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.303.5656.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemers, M., & Fiedler, K. (2007). Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Frontiers in Zoology, 4, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-4-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. J. (2004). The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology, 53, 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490472959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will, K. W., Mishler, B. D., & Wheeler, Q. D. (2005). The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500354878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wührl, L., Pylatiuk, C., Giersch, M., Lapp, F., von Rintelen, T., Balke, M., Schmidt, S., Cerretti, P., & Meier, R. (2021). DiversityScanner: Robotic discovery of small invertebrates with machine learning methods. BioRxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Wang, Y., Orr, M. C., Hongbin, W., & Zhang, A.-B. (2021). Identification of species by combining molecular and morphological data using convolutional neural networks. Systematic Biology, https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syab076
   Google Scholar
• Zamani, A., Fric, Z. F., Gante, H. F., Hopkins, T., Orfinger, A. B., Scherz, M. D., Sucháčková Bartoňová, A., & Pos, D. D. (2022). DNA barcodes on their own are not enough to describe a species. Systematic Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12538
   Google Scholar
• Zamani, A., Vahtera, V., Sääksjärvi, I. E., & Scherz, M. D. (2021). The omission of critical data in the pursuit of ‘revolutionary’ methods to accelerate the description of species. Systematic Entomology, 46, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar