Review of the osteology of the fossil fish formerly attributed to the genus †Chanoides and implications for the definition of otophysan bony characters

References

• Agassiz, J. L. R. 1833–44. Recherches sur les Poissons Fossiles, 5 vols. and supplement. Imprimerie de Petitpierre et Prince, Neuchâtel, 1420 pp., 396 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, J. S. & Fink, W. L. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of fossil neotropical electric fishes (Osteichthyes: Gymnotiformes) from the Upper Miocene of Bolivia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 27, 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allis, E. F. 1909. The cranial anatomy of the mail cheeked fishes. Zoologica, 22, 1–219.
   Google Scholar
• Arratia, G. & Schultze H.-P. 1991. Palatoquadrate and its ossifications: development and homology within osteichthyans. Journal of Morphology, 208, 1–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, N. C. & Mabee, P. M. 2003. Developmental morphology of the axial skeleton of the zebrafish, Danio rerio (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae). Developmental Dynamics, 228, 337–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, L. 1900. Schwimmblase, Knochenkapsel und Weber'scher Apparat von Nemachilus barbatulus Günther. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaften, 34, 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Blot, J. 1980. La faune ichthyologique des gisements du Monte Bolca (Province de Vérone, Italie). Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 4, 339–396.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, J. C. 2005. The biogeography of otophysan fishes (Ostariophysi, Otophysi): a new appraisal. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, P. M., Meunier, F. J. & Leal, M. E. C. 2007. Origine et diversification de l'ichthyofaune néotropicale: une revue. Cybium, 31(2), 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Britz, R. & Hoffman, M. 2006. Ontogeny and homology of the claustra in otophysan Ostariophysi (Teleostei). Journal of Morphology, 267, 909–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britz, R. & Moritz, T. 2007. Reinvestigation of the osteology of the miniature African freshwater fishes Cromeria and Grasseichthys (Teleostei, Gonorynchiformes, Kneriidae), with comments on Kneriidae relationships. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Zoologische Reihe, 83(1), 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Calcagnotto, D., Schaefer, S. A. & DeSalle, R. 2005. Relationships among characiform fishes inferred from analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 36, 135–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavin, L. 1999. A new Clupavidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi) from the Cenomanian of Daoura (Morocco). Comptes Rendus, Académie des Sciences, Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes, 329, 689–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chardon, M. & Vandevalle, P. 1997. Evolutionary trends and possible origin of the Weberian Apparatus. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 47(4), 383–403.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-J., Miya, M., Saitoh, K. & Mayden, R. L. 2008. Phylogenetic utility of two existing and four nouvel nuclear gene loci in reconstructing Tree of Life of ray-finned fishes: The Order Cypriniformes (Ostariophysi) as a case study. Gene, 423, 125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-J., Lavoué, S. & Mayden, R. L. 2013. Evolutionary origin and early biogeography of otophysan fishes (ostariophysi: teleostei). Evolution, 67, 2218–2239. doi: 10.1111/evo.12104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danil'chenko, P. G. 1967. Superorder Teleostei. Pp. 603–712 in D. V Obruchev (ed.) Fundamentals of Palaeontology, 11. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• de Cosmo, P. D. 2002. Rilevamento geologico et stratigrafia dell'area di Apricena (Provincia di Foggia). Unpublished Thesis, Tesi di Laurea, Universitá di Ferrara, 165 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Diogo, R. 2003. Higher-level phylogeny of Siluriformes: an overview. Pp. 353–384 in G. Arratia, B. G. Kappor, M. Chardon & R. Diogo (eds) Catfishes. Sciences Publisher. Inc., New Hampshire, USA. Enfield, New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Diogo, R. 2004. Phylogeny, origin and biogeography of catfishes: support for a Pangean origin of modern teleosts and reexamination of some Mesozoic Pangean connections between the Gondwana and Laurasian supercontinents. Animal Biology, 54, 331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornesco, G. T. & Soresco, C. 1971. Sur le développement et la valeur morphologique de la région ethmoïdale de la Carpe. Anatomischer Anzeiger, 129, 3–52.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C. R. 1905. Les types de Poissons fossiles du Monte-Bolca au Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Mémoires de la Société géologique de France, 34, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Filleul, A. & Maisey, J. G. 2004. Redescription of Santanichthys diasii (Otophysi, Characiformes) from the Albian of the Santana Formation and comments on its implications for otophysan relationships. American Museum Novitates, 3455, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, S. V. & Fink, W. L. 1981. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72, 297–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, S. V. & Fink, W. L. 1996. Interrelationships of Ostariophysan Fishes (Teleostei). Pp. 209–249 in M. Stiassny, L. Parenti & D. Johnson (eds) Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, H. W. 1974. A catalogue of world fishes (XX). Quartely Journal of the Taiwan Museum, 27, 479–610.
   Google Scholar
• Gayet, M. 1985. Contribution à l’Étude Anatomique et Systématique de l’Ichthyofaune Cénomanienne du Portugal. Comunicações do Serviço Geológico de Portugal, 71, 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• Gayet, M. & Chardon, M. 1987. Possible otophysic connections in some fossil and living ostariophysan fishes. Proceedings of the Vth Congress of European Ichthyology, Stockholm, 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, E. S. 1909. Vertebrata Craniata, first fascicle: cyclostomes and fishes. Pp in R. Lankester (ed) A Treatise on Zoology. A. & C. Black, London.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, L. & Bemis, W. 1998. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Supplement to the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18 (1), 1–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, T. & de Pinna, M. 2004. The evolution of the Weberian Apparatus: A phylogenetic perspective. Pp. 429–448 in G. Arratia & A. Tintori (eds) Mesozoic fishes 3: Systematics, Paleoenvironments, and Biodiversity. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, T. & Young, B. 2004. The ontogeny of the Weberian Apparatus in the zebrafish Danio rerio (Ostariophysi: Cypriniformes) with comments on the homology of Weberian ossicles. Zoological Journal of Linnean Society, 140, 241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, T. & Poyato-Ariza, F. 2010. Reassessment and comparative morphology of the gonorhynchiform head skeleton. Pp. 1–38 in T. Grande, F. Poyato-Ariza & R. Diogo (eds) Gonorynchiformes and Ostariophysan Relationships: a comprehensive review. Sciences Publisher, Inc., Enfield, New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, M. 2005. The phylogenetic relationships of non-diplomystid catfishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences; the search for the ictalurid sister taxon (Otophysi: Siluriformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 37, 700–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G. & Smith, A. G. 1989. A geologic time scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 263 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, R. W. 1955. The osteocranium of the American Cyprinid Fish, Notropis bifrenatus, with an Annotated Synonymy of Teleost Skull Bones. Copeia, 4, 267–290.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. & Britz, R. 2006. Ontogeny and homology of the neural complex of otophysan Ostariophysi. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 175, 301–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, J. G. 1985. Cranial muscles of gonorynchiforms fishes, with comments on generic relationships. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology Series, 49, 273–303.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, D. S. 1923. A classification of fishes, including families and genera as far as known. Stanford University Publications, 3, 77–243.
   Google Scholar
• Lauder, G.V. & Liem, K. F. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 150, 1–197.
   Google Scholar
• Maiden, R., Tang, K. L., Wood, R. M., Chen. W. -J., Agnew, M. K., Conway, K. W., Yang, L., Simons, A. M., Bart, H. L., Harris, P. M., Li, J., Wang, X., Saitoh, K., He, S., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Nishida, M. & Miya, M. 2008. Inferring the Tree of Life of the order Cypriniformes, the Earth's most diverse clade of freshwater fishes: Implications of varied taxon and character sampling. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 46(3), 424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, T. & Britz, R. 2005. Ontogeny and homology of the basipterygoid articulation in Pantodon buchholzi (Teleostei: Osteoglossomorpha). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 144, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, O., Valentin, X. & Garcia, G. 2008. Cretaceous characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) from Northern Tethys: description of new material from the Maastrichtian of Provence (Southern France) and palaeobiogeographical implications. Pp. 155–164 in L. Cavin, A. Longbottom & M. Richter (eds) Fishes and the Break-up of Pangea. Geological Society of London, Special Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, C. 1970. Two Upper Cretaceous salmoniform fishes from the Lebanon. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series, 19, 205–296.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, C. 1975. The braincase of the pholidophorid and leptolepid fishes, with a review of the actinopterygian braincase. Phyilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series, 269, 275–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, C. 1984. Chanoides, a marine Eocene otophysan fish (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4, 430–456.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Z., He, S., Wang, J., Wang, W. & Diogo, R. 2006. Mitochondrial molecular clocks and the origin of the major Otocephalan clades (Pisces: Teleostei): A new insight. Gene, 360, 113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. 3rd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ix + 468 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, D. E. & Greenwood, P. H. 1970. Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. American Museum Novitates, 2428, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sagemehl, M. 1885. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Fische. III. Das Cranium der Characinidien nebst allgemeinen Bemerkungen über die mit einem Weber'schen Apparat versehenen Physostomenfamilien. Morphologisches Jahrebücher, 10, 1–119.
   Google Scholar
• Saitoh, K., Sado, T., Doosey, M. H., Bart. Jr., H. L., Inoue, J. G., Nishida, M., Mayden, R. L. & Miya, M. 2011. Evidence from mitochondrial genomics supports the lower Mesozoic of South Asia as the time and place of divergence of basal divergence of cypriniform fishes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi). Zoological Journal of Linnean Society, 161, 633–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks, E. C. 1926. Bones of the ethmoid region of the fish skull. Stanford University Publications, Biological Science, 4 (3), 137–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. P., Lundberg, J. G. & Hardman, M. 2006. A phylogenetic analysis of the major groups of catfishes (Teleostei: Siluriformes) using rag1 and rag2 nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41, 636–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taverne, L. 2005. Les poissons crétacés de Nardò. 20º. Chanoides chardoni sp. nov. (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Otophysi). Bolletino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 29, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Taverne, L. & de Cosmo, P. D. 2008. Les poissons du Santonien (Crétacé supérieur) d’Apricena (Italie du Sud). 1º. Chanoides weberi sp. nov. (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Otophysi, Chanoididae). Bolletino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 32, 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Toombs, H. A. & Rixon, A. E. 1959. The use of acids in the preparation of vertebrate fossils. Curator, 2, 304–312.
   Google Scholar
• Vari, R. 1979. Anatomy, relationships and classification of the families Citharinidae and Distichodontidae (Pisces, Characoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology Series, 36, 261–344.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M. 1939. The development of the Weberian ossicles and anterior vertrebrae in the goldfish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 127, 452–472.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E.H. 1820. De aure et auditu hominis et animalium. Pars I. De aure animalium aquatilium. Lipsia (Leipzig), Gerhard Fleischer, 168 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, W. 1920. Die Septarientonfische des Mainzer Beckens. Eine vorläufige Mitteilung. Jahrebücher des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde, 72, 2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, E. O. & Johnson, D. G. 2010. A teleost classification based on monophyletic groups. Pp. 123–182 in J. Nelson, H.-P. Schultze & M. Wilson (eds) Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, A. S. 1901. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume 4. British Museum (Natural History), London, xxxviii + 636 pp, 19 pls, 22 figs.
   Google Scholar
• Zanata, A. M. & Vari, R. P. 2005. The family Alestidae (Ostariophysi, Characiformes): a phylogenetic analyis of a trans-Atlantic clade. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 145, 1–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, K. A. von, Eastman, C. R. & Woodward, A. S. 1932. Text-Book of Palaeontology. 2nd English Edition. Macmillan, London, xvii + 464 pp.
   Google Scholar