292
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Success factors for OSH implementation. Opening the black box of OSH realisation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 196-210 | Received 31 Jan 2019, Accepted 22 Jun 2020, Published online: 03 Aug 2020

References

  • Arnholtz, J., & Hansen, N.W. (2013). Labour market specific institutions and the working conditions of labour migrants: The case of Polish migrant labour in the Danish labour market. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 34(3), 401–422. doi:10.1177/0143831X12450055
  • Ashby, W.R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall
  • Atkinson, J. (1985). Flexibility, uncertainty and manpower management. Brighton: Institute of Manpower Studies
  • COWI, IOM, & Milieu. (2015). Evaluation of the practical implementation of the EU Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Directives in EU Member States: Synthesis report. Copenhagen: Cowi.
  • De Geus, A. (1997). The living company. Habits for the survival in a turbulent business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dekker, S.Z.W. (2014). The bureaucratization of safety. Safety Science, 70, 348–357. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.015
  • Dingwall, R., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2017). Health and safety in a changing world. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Doppler, K., & Lauterburg, C. (2008). Change management. Den Unternehmenswandel gestalten, Frankfurt: Campus.
  • Ekspertudvalget om udredning af arbejdsmiljøindsatsen [The expert commission on working environment policies and efforts] (2018). Et nyt og forbedret arbejdsmiljø – Overvejelser og anbefalinger [A new and improved working environment – Considerations and recommendations, report]. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Employment. Retrieved January 17, 2019, from https://bm.dk/media/8001/endelig-rapport.pdf
  • EU-OSHA. (2018). Safety and health in micro and small enterprises in the EU: Final report from the 3-year SESAME project. Bilbao: Author.
  • Eurostat (2018). Annual enterprise statistics by size class for special aggregates of activities (NACE Rev. 2). Luxembourg: Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/e1USD9juizbBvCXBVLjQ
  • Frick, K. (2014). The 50/50 implementation of Sweden’s mandatory systematic work environment management. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 12(2), 23–26. doi:10.1080/14774003.2014.11667802
  • Frick, K. (2017). Mandatory OHS management is mostly an ineffective 'side-car' because employers delegate it away to un-empowered line managers. In: A. Bernatik, L. Korcurkova, & K. Jørgensen (Eds.), Prevention of accidents at work – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the prevention of accidents, 3–7 October 2017, Prague (pp 97–103). London: CRC Press.
  • Hale, A., & Borys, D. (2013). Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety Science, 55, 207–221. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011
  • Hale, A., Borys, D., & Adams, M. (2015). Safety regulation: The lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden. Safety Science, 71 (Part B), 112–122. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.012
  • Hasle, P., Limborg, H.J., Grøn, S., & Refslund, B. (2017). Orchestration in work environment policy programs. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(3), 43–62. doi:10.18291/njwls.v7i3.97092
  • Hasle, P., Limborg, H.J., & Nielsen, K.T. (2014). Working environment interventions – Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice. Safety Science, 68, 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.014
  • Hasle, P., Møller, N., Refslund, B., Limborg, H.J., Nielsen, K.T., Bramming, P., & Seim, R. (2016). Virkemidler i arbejdsmiljøindsatsen – Afslutningsrapport fra Center for forskning i virkemidler og arbejdsmiljøindsatser (CAVI). [Policies in OHS – Final report from Centre for Research on OHS Policies and Interventions]. København. Retrieved from http://cavinet.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/CAVI-slutrapport-20161012-med-engelsk-summary-1.pdf
  • Howard-Grenville, J.A. (2006). Inside the “Black Box”. How organizational culture and subcultures inform interpretations and actions on environmental issues. Organization & Environment, 19(1), 46–73. doi:10.1177/1086026605285739
  • Hudson, P. (2001). Safety management and safety culture: The long, hard and winding road. In: W. Pearse, C. Gallagher, L. Bluff (Eds.). Occupational health and safety management systems. Melbourne: Crown Content.
  • Hurley, J., Jungblut, J.-M., Meyerkord, A., Storrie, D., Vacas, C., & Broughton, A. (2012). After restructuring: Labour markets, working conditions and life satisfaction. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofond), Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • International Labour Organization (ILO). (2008). Seoul Declaration on safety and health at work. Geneva: Author.
  • Jain, A., Leka, S., & Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and psychosocial risk management in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 619–633. doi:10/1007/s10551-011-0742-z
  • Jain, A., Leka, S., & Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M. (2018). The fundamental human right to health, safety and wellbeing. In: A. Jain, S. Leka, & G.I.J.M. Zwetsloot (Eds.), Managing health, safety and wellbeing – Ethics, responsibility and sustainability (pp. 139–173). Dordrecht: Springer Science.
  • Kagan, R.A., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2011). Fear, duty, and regulatory compliance: lessons from three research projects. In Parker C. & Nielsen V.L. (Eds.). Explaining compliance : Business responses to regulation (pp. 37–58). Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.
  • Kettunen, P. (2012). Reinterpreting the historicity of the Nordic model. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2 (4), 21–43. doi:10.19154/njwls.v2i4.2303
  • Leka, S., & Iavicoli, S. (2017). The psychosocial work environment in times of change: Society and the workplace. Safety Science, 100(Part A), 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.013
  • Mathisen, G.E., Brønnick, K., Arntzen, K.J., & Bergh, L.I.V. (2017). Identifying and managing psychosocial risks during organizational restructuring: It’s what you do and how you do it. Safety Science, 100(Part A), 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.007
  • Müller, K., & Vogt, N. (2014). Soloselbstständigkeit im handwerk. Anzahl, bedeutung und merkmale der ein-personen-unternehmen – kurzfassung [Self-employed in crafts and trade. Number, importance and features – short version]. Deutsches Handwerksinstitut DHI (Ed.). Göttingen: Mecke. Retrieved from http://www.ifh.wiwi.uni-goettingen.de/sites/default/files/AH%2073%20Ein-Personen-Unternehmen.pdf
  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy. A realist perspective. London: Sage Publications.
  • Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
  • Pilbeam, C., Denyer, D., Doherty, D., & Davidson, R. (2019). Designing safer working interventions through a literature review using a mechanisms-based approach. Safety Science, 120, 352–361. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.017
  • Poulsen, S., & Ipsen, C. (2017). In times of change: How distance managers can ensure employees’ wellbeing and organizational performance. Safety Science, 100, 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.002.
  • Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May–June 1990, 2–14.
  • Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk modelling in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science, 27 (2-3), 183–213. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
  • Rauch, A., Tophoven, S., Eggs, J., & Tisch, A. (2015). Arbeitsbezogene gesundheitsrelevante Faktoren im fortgeschrittenen Erwerbsalter: eine Studie mit neuen Analysemöglichkeiten. WSI-Mitteilungen, 68(3), 212–218. doi:10.5771/0342-300X-2015-3-212.
  • Schein, E.H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schmitt, B., & Hammer, A. (2015). Für welche betrieblichen kontexte ist der prozess der gefährdungsbeurteilung anschlussfähig? [For what enterprise contexts is the process of risk assessment suitable?]. WSI-Mitteilungen, 68 (3), 202–211. doi:10.5771/0342-300X-2015-3-202
  • Schmitt-Howe, B. (2017). What kind of prevention cultures are prevailing? – Typical dialogues on occupational safety and health in German companies. In: Bernatik A, Korcurkova L, Jørgensen K (Eds.), Prevention of accidents at work – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the prevention of accidents, 3–7 October 2017, Prague (pp. 171–177). London: CRC Press.
  • Schmitt-Howe, B., & Hammer, A. (2019). Formen von Präventionskultur in Deutschen Betrieben [Forms of prevention culture in German enterprises], Dortmund: BAuA Forschungsbericht F 2342. Retrieved from www.baua.de/dok/8752192
  • Sczesny, C., Keindorf, S., Droß, P.J., & Jasper, G. (2014). Kenntnisstand von Unternehmen und Beschäftigten auf dem Gebiet des Arbeits- und Gesundheitsschutzes in KMU [Knowledge status of enterprises and employees concerning OSH in SME]. Dortmund: BAuA Forschungsbericht F 1913. Retrieved from www.baua.de/dok/5047828
  • Seim, R., Møller, N., & Limborg, H. J. (2016). Professionelle og medarbejderrepræsentanter — nye roller i arbejdsmiljøarbejdet. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 18(1), 18–33. doi:10.7146/tfa.v18i1.109010.
  • US Census Bureau. (2018). 2014-2015 SUSB employment change data – Tables. Retrieved December 4, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2015/econ/susb/2015-susb-employment.html
  • Van den Heuvel, S.G., Bakhuys Roozeboom, M.C., Eekhout, I., Venema, A. (Eds.). (2018). Management of psychosocial risks in European workplaces – Evidence from the second European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks (ESENER-2). European Risk Observatory Report. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
  • Walters, D., & Wadsworth, E. (2016). Contexts and arrangements for occupational safety and health in micro and small enterprises in the EU – SESAME project: the Literature Study. Bilbao: EU-Osha.
  • Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M., Kines, P., Ruotsala, R., Drupsteen, L., Merivirta, M.L., & Bezemer, R.A. (2017). The importance of commitment, communication, culture and learning for the implementation of the zero accident vision in 27 companies in Europe. Safety Science, 96, 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.001
  • Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M., Kines, P., Wybo, J.L., Ruotsala, R., Drupsteen, L., & Bezemer, R.A. (2017). Zero accident vision based strategies in organisations: Innovative perspectives. Safety Science, 91, 260–268. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.016
  • Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M., Leka, S., & Kines, P. (2017). Vision zero: From accident prevention to the promotion of health, safety and wellbeing at work. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 15(2), 88–100. doi:10.1080/14773996.2017.1308701

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.