Is university-industry collaboration biased by sex criteria?

References

• Abramo, G., D´Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). University-Industry research collaboration: A model to assess university capability. Higher Education, 62(2), 163–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). New York: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2007). What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university–Industry interaction. Technovation, 27(11), 704–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006). Faculty support for the objectives of U-I relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 35(1), 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. G. (1999). Academics‟ motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(3), 343–359.
   Google Scholar
• Bartus, T. (2005). Estimation of marginal effects using margeff. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 5, 309-329. doi:10.1177/1536867X0500500303
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R., Litt, J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Creating a status of women report: Institutional housekeeping as women’s work. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 16(1), 194–206.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. T., Bieber, J. P., Lawrence, J. H., & Trautvetter, L. C. (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship, and service. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 385–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29(2), 142–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers´ interaction with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaboration motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relation between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 662–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, G., & Orsenigo, L. (2003). Variables influencing industrial funding of academic research in Italy. An empirical analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(24), 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, N., Fernández-López, S., Rodeiro-Pazos, D., & Rodríguez-Gulías, M. J. (2018, October 3).Analysis of the researcher´s motivators to collaborate with firms as drivers of the triple helix dynamics. Global Business and Economics Review. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=GBER
   Google Scholar
• Corley, E, & Gaughan, M. (2005). Scientists’ Participation in University Research Centers: What are The Gender Differences? Journal Of Technology Transfer, 30, 371–381.
   Google Scholar
• D´Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). U-I linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D´Este, P., & Perkman, M. (2011). Why academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, L. P., Etemad, H., & Wright, R. (2008). Toward a paradigm of symbiotic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business, 5(2), 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Etemad, H., Wright, R., & Dana, L. P. (2001). Symbiotic International business networks: Collaboration between small and large firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(4), 481–494.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. She figures 2015 gender in research and innovation. Luxemburg Retrieved January, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender…/she_figures_2015-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W., & Senker, J. (1995). Knowledge frontiers: Industrial innovation and public sector research in biotechnology, engineering ceramics and parallel computing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-López, S., Calvo, N., & Rodeiro-Pazos, D. (2018). The funnel model of firm´s R&D cooperation with universities. Science and Public Policy. Advance on line publication. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Lopez, S., Pérez, B., Rodeiro-Pazos, D., & Calvo, N. (2015). Are firms interested in collaborating with universities? An open-innovation perspective in countries of the South West European space. Service Business, 9(4), 637–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., & Zippel, K. 2015. Gender equality in the age of academic capitalism: Discursive intersections and university restructuring (Working Paper Alexander von Humboldt). Foundation TRANS-COOP grant TARGET: Transatlantic Applied Research on Gender Equity Training: Restructuring of Modern Knowledge Economies and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., Raposo, M. L., & Fernandez, C. I. (2013). The impact of inter-firm cooperation on performance: A two-region experience. In J. Ferreira, M. Raposo, R. Rutten, & A. Varga (Eds.), Cooperation, clusters and knowledge transfer. Universities and firms towards regional competitiveness (pp. 81–102). Berlin: Advances in Spacial Science, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., Dana, L., & Ratten, V. (2017). Knowledge spillover-based strategic entrepreneurship. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, F. (1994). Managerial sex role stereotyping among academic staff within UK business schools. Women in Management Review, 9(3), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frehill, L. M., & Zippel, K. (2010). Survey of doctorate recipients, 2006: Findings on international collaborations of academic scientists and engineers. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2014). Academics, cultural workers and critical labour studies. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 12–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2016). Resilience, apps and reluctant individualism: Technologies of self in the neoliberal academy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabelloti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy, 39(6), 748–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2010). New forms of strategic research collaboration between firms and universities in the German research system. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(1/2), 94–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kotrlick, J. W., II., Bertlett, J. E., Higgings, C. C., & Williams, H. A. (2002). Factors associated with research productivity of agricul-tural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, M. (1998). Patent buyouts: A mechanism for encouraging innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1137–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (1996). Technology Transfer and the research university: A search for the boundaries of U-I collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of U-I research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(78), 773–776.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Y. (2016). Collaboration patterns and patenting: Exploring gender distinctions. Research Policy, 45(1), 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: U-I interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A. S., Rickne, A., & Bengtsson, L. (2010). Transfer of academic research: Uncovering the grey zone. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 617–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4(2), 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. Working party of national experts on science and technology indicators: Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati Manual. Retrieved January, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/38235147.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Okamuro, H., Kato, M., & Honjo, Y. (2011). Determinants of R&D cooperation in Japanese start-ups. Research Policy, 40(5), 728–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service. Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D´Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on U-I relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on U-I collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31(7), 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, M. M., & Bruning, N. S. (1980). A comparison of the relationships between subordinates’ perceptions of supervisory behavior and measures of subordinates’ job satisfaction for male and female leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 717–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, H. 2011. Knowledge transfer in the mirror: Reflections on the determinants of research groups and companies collaborative patterns within Andalusia´s regional innovation system. Presented at 51st European Congress of the Regional Science Association International, Barcelona. ERSA Conference Papers. European Regional Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fisher, M., & Fröhlich., M. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, V. E. (1975). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuelke-Leech, V. A. (2013). Resources and research: An empirical study of the influence of departmental research resources on individual STEM researchers involvement with industry. Research Policy, 42(9), 1667–1678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J. M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry–University interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Gaag, M. P. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2004). Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital. In H. Flap & B. V¨Olker (Eds.), Creation and returns of social capital (pp. 199–218). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2000). Unbending Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R., & Dana, L. P. (2003). changing paradigms of international entrepreneurship strategy. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 135–152.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity revisited: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. M., & Hurlic, D. (2007). Gender enactment at work. The importance of gender and gender-related behaviour to person-organizational fit and career decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(2), 168–187.
   Google Scholar
• Zippel, K., Ferree, M. M., & Zimmermann, K. (2016). Gender equality in German universities: Vernacularising the battle for the best brains. Gender and Education, 28(7), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar