Successful entrepreneurial learning: success factors of adaptive governance of the commons

References

• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. Mis quarterly, 107–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 995–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., … McConney, P. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social–Ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghel, R., Stepan, L., & Hill, J. K. (Eds.). (2017). Water, knowledge and the environment in Asia: Epistemologies, practices and locales. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society & Natural Resources, 26(1), 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brondizio, E. S., Ostrom, E., & Young, O. R. (2009). Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: The role of social capital. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 253–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, P. J., Tsing, A. L., & Zerner, C. (Eds.). (2005). Communities and conservation: Histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. UK: Rowman Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Cantino, V., Devalle, A., Cortese, D., Ricciardi, F., & Longo, M. (2017). Place-based network organizations and embedded entrepreneurial learning: Emerging paths to sustainability. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(3), 504–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2007). Knowledge assets value creation map: Assessing knowledge assets value drivers using AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 814–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2009). Applying the analytic network process to disclose knowledge assets value creation dynamics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7687–7694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., … Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castrogiovanni, G., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., Mas-Tur, A., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2016). Where to acquire knowledge: Adapting knowledge management to financial institutions. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1812–1816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W., & Li, H. (2001). Information priority‐setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Information Management & Computer Security, 9(2), 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cordell, L. (1978). Regional geophysical setting of the rio grande rift. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 89(7), 1073–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., & Ramanathan, V. (2014). Pursuit of the common good. Science, 345(6203), 1457–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & O’Flaherty, M. R. (2007). Researchers, indigenous peoples, and place-based learning communities. Society and Natural Resources, 20(4), 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doubleday, N. (2007). Culturing adaptive co-management: Finding “keys” to resilience in asymmetries of power. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multi-level governance (pp. 228–248). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D. A. N., Hayes, T., Kull, C. A., … Shrestha, K. (2010). From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. (2008, July). The competitive imperative of learning. Harvard Business Review, 86(7–8), 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felber, C., & Hagelberg, G. (2017). The economy for common good. A Workable, transformative ethics-based alternative. The Next System Project.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–Ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T. (2008). Political ecology and the epistemology of social justice. Geoforum, 39(2), 756–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L., & Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39(4), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T. (2011). Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: Who is accountable?. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34(4), 573–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. (2017). A method for identifying the critical success factors of CoP based on performance evaluation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(4), 572–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann. (1970). The Legacy of Max Weber. London: Heinnemann.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. A., & Bromley, D. W. (1990). Property rights, externalities, and resource degradation: locating the tragedy. Journal of Development Economics, 33(2), 235–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pira, M., Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M., & Pluchino, A. (2015). Analysis of AHP methods and the Pairwise Majority Rule (PMR) for collective preference rankings of sustainable mobility solutions. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 777–787.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., & Morehouse, B. J. (2005). The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., … Ostrom, E. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas-Tur, A., Pinazo, P., Tur-Porcar, A. M., & Sánchez-Masferrer, M. (2015). What to avoid to succeed as an entrepreneur. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2279–2284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 118–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millet, I. (2005). Management by issues: An organizational system for processing problems and opportunities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(3), 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9(4), 2–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1987). Institutional arrangements for resolving the commons dilemma: Some contending approaches. The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, 250–265.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1988). Institutional arrangements and the commons dilemma. Rethinking institutional analysis and development: Issues, alternatives, and choices, 103–139
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Self-governance and forest resources. Terracotta Reader: A Market Approach to the Environment, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Gardner, R. (1993). Coping with asymmetries in the commons: Self-governing irrigation systems can work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 93–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oztaysi, B. (2014). A decision model for information technology selection using AHP integrated TOPSIS-Grey: The case of content management systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 70, 44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, E., Heaslip, R., Silver, J. J., & Furman, K. (2008). Finding “space” for comanagement of forests within the neoliberal paradigm: Rights, strategies, and tools for asserting a local agenda. Human Ecology, 36(3), 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porzecanski, I., Saunders, L. V., & Brown, M. T. (2012). Adaptive management fitness of watersheds. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roig-Tierno, N., Baviera-Puig, A., Buitrago-Vera, J., & Mas-Verdu, F. (2013). The retail site location decision process using GIS and the analytical hierarchy process. Applied Geography, 40, 191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1990), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2001). Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process. In D. Schmoldt, J. Kangas, G. A. Mendoza, & M. Pesonen (Eds.), The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making (pp. 15–35). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, M., Westley, F., & Brock, W. (2003). Slow response of societies to new problems: Causes and costs. Ecosystems, 6(5), 493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiuma, G., Carlucci, D., & Sole, F. (2012). Applying a systems thinking framework to assess knowledge assets dynamics for business performance improvement. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8044–8050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipahi, S, & Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: An overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. (2005). Naming security-constructing identity: 'Mayan-women' in guatemala on the eve of 'peace'. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarn, D. D. (2015). Integrated decision model for knowledge offshoring and outsourcing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. (2015). Customs in common: studies in traditional popular culture. New Press/ORIM.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Llorca Mestre, A. (2018). Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), 452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 445–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. (1997). Beyond outsourcing: managing IT resources as a value center. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, L. O., Freeland-Graves, J. H., Milani, T., Hanss-Nuss, H., George, G., Sterling, B. S., … Stuifbergen, A. (2004). Weight and behavioral and psychosocial factors among ethnically diverse, low-income women after childbirth: I. Methods and context. Women & Health, 40(2), 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. K., & Li, H. (2008). Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment, 43(1), 108–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. (2015). Co-productive governance: A relational framework for adaptive governance. Global Environmental Change, 30, 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C., & Dovers, S. (2014). Prescribing adaptiveness in agencies of the state. Global Environmental Change, 24(24), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar