A conceptual model of knowledge dynamics in the industry 4.0 smart grid scenario

References

• Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Alahakoon, D., & Yu, X. (2016). Smart electricity meter data intelligence for future energy systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 12(1), 425–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2017). Knowledge strategy planning: An integrated approach to manage uncertainty, turbulence, and dynamics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 233–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratianu, C. (2016). Knowledge dynamics. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4(3), 323.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Raja, U. (2014). In the realm of Big Data. First Monday, 19(2).
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 37–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L. (2013). Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, K. A. (2007). Tacit knowledge revisited – We can still learn from Polanyi. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, C., Wollman, D. A., Prochaska, D. E., Boynton, P. A., Mazer, J. A., Nguyen, C. T., … Pillitteri, V. Y. (2014). Nist framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 3.0 (No. Special Publication (NIST SP)-1108r3).
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, N. (2016). Determinants of an appropriate degree of autonomy in a cyber-physical production system. Procedia CIRP, 52, 1–5. Potsdam, Germany: University of Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, N., Grum, M., & Bender, B. (2016). Determining the optimal level of autonomy in cyber-physical production systems, In 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (pp. 1293–1299). France: Futuroscope-Poitiers.
   Google Scholar
• Gronau, N., Thim, C., Ullrich, A., Vladova, G., & Weber, E. (2016). A proposal to model knowledge in knowledge-intensive business processes. In BMSD (Vol. 16, pp. 98–103). Rhodes, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 105.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3928–3937). Koloa, HI: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hislop, D. (2002). “Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology. Journal of Information Technology, 17(3), 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
   Google Scholar
• Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D., & Wahlster, W. (2011). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem internet der dinge auf dem weg zur 4. industriellen revolution. VDI Nachrichten, 13, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kakihara, M., & Sørensen, C. (2002). Exploring knowledge emergence: From chaos to organizational knowledge. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 5(3), 48–66.
   Google Scholar
• Karnouskos, S. (2014). The cloud of things empowered smart grid cities. In G. Fortino & P. Trunfio (Eds.), Internet of things based on smart objects (pp. 129–142). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (2015). A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 164–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrinidis, A., & Jagadish, H. V. (2012). Challenges and opportunities with big data. Proceedings VLDB Endowment, 5(12), 2032–2033.
   Google Scholar
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Jin, C. (2016). Introduction to cyber manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 8, 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP, 16, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Leitao, P., Karnouskos, S., Ribeiro, L., Lee, J., Strasser, T., & Colombo, A. W. (2016). Smart agents in industrial cyber–physical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(5), 1086–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugmayr, A., Stockleben, B., Scheib, C., & Mailaparampil, M. A. (2017). Cognitive big data: Survey and review on big data research and its implications. What is really ‘new’ in big data? Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloni, A., Pegoraro, P. A., Atzori, L., Benigni, A., & Sulis, S. (2018). Cloud-based IoT solution for state estimation in smart grids: Exploiting virtualization and edge-intelligence technologies. Computer Networks, 130, 156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minerva, R., Biru, A., & Rotondi, D. (2015). Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet Initiative, 1, 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications, and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monostori, L. (2014). Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP, 17, 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Munshi, A. A., & Mohamed, Y. A.-R. I. (2018). Data lake lambda architecture for smart grids big data analytics. IEEE Access, 6, 40463–40471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munshi, A. A., & Yasser, A.-R. M. (2017). Big data framework for analytics in smart grids. Electric Power Systems Research, 151, 369–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. E. (2002). An extended model of knowledge-flow dynamics. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 18.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oks, S. J., Fritzsche, A., & Möslein, K. M. (2017). An application map for industrial cyber-physical systems. In S. Jeschke, C. Brecher, H. Song, & D. B. Rawat (Eds.), Industrial internet of things (pp. 21–46). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pauleen, D. J., & Wang, W. Y. C. (2017). Does big data mean big knowledge? KM perspectives on big data and analytics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards apost-critical philosophy. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1977). Meaning. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. New York, NY: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Sonntag, D., Zillner, S., van der Smagt, P., & Lörincz, A. (2017). Overview of the CPS for smart factories project: Deep learning, knowledge acquisition, anomaly detection and intelligent user interfaces. In Industrial internet of things (pp. 487–504). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stenmark, D. (2002). Information vs. knowledge: The role of intranets in knowledge management. In System sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Big Island, HI (pp. 928–937).
   Google Scholar
• Sumbal, M. S., Tsui, E., & See-to, E. W. (2017). Interrelationship between big data and knowledge management: An exploratory study in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2005). Do we really understand tacit knowledge?. In S. Little & T. Ray (Eds.), Managing knowledge: an essential reader (pp. 107). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi, I. (1999). Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. In Systems sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on  Hawaii, USA (p. 12). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Gan, D., Yang, J., Kirschen, D. S., & Kang, C. (2018). Deep learning-based socio-demographic information identification from smart meter data. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Choo, C., & Correa Drummond de Alvarenga Neto, R. (2010). Beyond the ba: Managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(4), 592–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, K. M. (2003). A knowledge model for situation‐handling. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(5), 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkesmann, M., & Wilkesmann, U. (2018). Industry 4.0–Organizing routines or innovations? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(2), 238–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, J. Y. T., & Lee, R. W. B. (2017). Knowledge elicitation practices for organizational development intervention. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar