Organisational learning for the common good: an emerging model

References

• Adams, W. M., Brockington, D., Dyson, J., & Vira, B. (2003). Managing tragedies: Understanding conflict over common pool resources. Science, 302(5652), 1915–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (second edition). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 104–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (2002). Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 206–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, W. C., Treem, J. W., & Kuhn, T. (2018). Valuing multiple trajectories of knowledge: A critical review and agenda for knowledge management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 278–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3305–3325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 4(2), 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? the interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn, S., Edwards, M., & Angus-Leppan, T. (2013). Organizational learning and the sustainability community of practice: The role of boundary objects. Organization and Environment, 26(2), 184–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, A., & Bennet, D. (2004). The partnership between organizational learning and knowledge management. In C. Holsapple. (Ed.), Handbook of kowledge management 1 (pp. 439–455). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, R., & Hannon, M. (2016). Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding. Research Policy, 45(9), 1731–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., Gunn, J. A. E., Pope, J., & Retief, F. (2015). Managing uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance in impact assessment by embedding evolutionary resilience, participatory modelling and adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 587–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. R., Farrelly, M. A., & Loorbach, D. A. (2013). Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: The case of Melbourne’s stormwater management. Global Environmental Change, 23(4), 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantino, V., Devalle, A., Cortese, D., Ricciardi, F., & Longo, M. (2017). Place-based network organizations and embedded entrepreneurial learning: Emerging paths to sustainability. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23(3), 504–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2006). Knowledge asset value spiral: Linking knowledge assets to company’s performance. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(1), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, H., Niu, M.-S., & Niu, K.-H. (2014). Industrial cluster involvement, organizational learning, and organizational adaptation: An exploratory study in high technology industrial districts. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 971–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coudel, E., Tonneau, J.-P., & Rey-Valette, H. (2011). Diverse approaches to learning in rural and development studies: Review of the literature from the perspective of action learning. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 9(2), 120–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1087–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0033247585&partnerID=40&md5=a71792eb027073f867ffb275a7a1e589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., Maurer, C., & White, R. (2011). Reflections on the 2009 AMR decade award: Do we have a theory of organizational learning? Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 446–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundill, G., & Fabricius, C. (2009). Monitoring in adaptive co-management: Toward a learning based approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3205–3211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., & Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16(4), 332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories of organizational legitimacy and learning. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 220–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, J. (2013). The third stage of IC: Towards a new IC future and beyond. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques. Human Relations, 50(9), 1085–1113. Retrieved from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0039378039&partnerID=40&md5=f1292726b6c266988e7664dc7102c3dc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrella, M. (Ed.). (2000). Learning from change: Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation. Ottawa: ITDG Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Etzion, D., Gehman, J., Ferraro, F., & Avidan, M. (2017). Unleashing sustainability transformations through robust action. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad, O. D., Snow, C. C., Raymond, E. M., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 734–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D., Myrden, S. E., & Jones, T. D. (2015). Understanding “disengagement from knowledge sharing”: Engagement theory versus adaptive cost theory. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(3), 476–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, S. A. (2010). A general model of the public goods dilemma. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(6), 1245–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frémeaux, S., Puyou, F.-R., & Michelson, G. (2018). Beyond accountants as technocrats: A common good perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPA.2018.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Furnari, S. (2016). Institutional fields as linked arenas: Inter-field resource dependence, institutional work and institutional change. Human Relations, 69(3), 551–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., Mcgahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth : Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Mangement Studies, 49(4), 661–683.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2001). The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer, & R. Selton (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 37–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandori, A., Kogut, B., Grandori, A., & Kogut, B. (2002). Dialogue on organization and knowledge. Organization Science, 13(3), 224–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knoweldge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the New Commons. In Governing shared resources: Conneting local experience to global challenges. The twelfth biennial conference of the international association for the study of the commons (pp. 1–76). doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356835
   Google Scholar
• Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., & George, G. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1227–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M., Harrison, J. S., & Felps, W. (2018). How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jyothibabu, C., Farooq, A., & Pradhan, B. B. (2010). An integrated scale for measuring an organizational learning system. Learning Organization, 17(4), 303–327.
   Google Scholar
• Kayes, D. C. (2015). Organizational resilience: How learning sustains organizations in crisis, disaster, and breakdown. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labedz, C. S., Cavaleri, S. A., & Berry, G. R. (2011). Interactive knowledge management: Putting pragmatic policy planning in place. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 551–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalor, B. M., & Hickey, G. M. (2014). Strengthening the role of science in the environmental decision-making processes of executive government. Organization and Environment, 27(2), 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–513. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0010101822&partnerID=40&md5=13e49c5046e9527e05d7435fd0bc17a2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633–755. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0942278801&partnerID=40&md5=eb4343226dcb392d1028711c01798707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., & March, J. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloria, M. B., & Moreno-Luzon, M. D. (2014). Organizational learning: Proposal of an integrative scale and research instrument. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 692–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, J. E. N., Salazar, E. A., & De Castro, G. M. (2006). Organizational capital as competitive advantage of the firm. Journal Of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 324–337.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality : Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2010). Linking local experiments to global standards: How project networks promote global institution-building. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 398–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, B., Schiuma, G., & Neely, A. (2004). Intellectual capital–Defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 551–569.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. (2009). Thinking in Systems. London: Sterling.
   Google Scholar
• Miner, A. S., & Mezias, S. J. (1996). Ugly duckling no more: past and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, 7(1), 88–99. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0642345252&partnerID=40&md5=b4aa10693c3bd30a765e1ed264981803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirvis, P., Herrera, M. E. B., Googins, B., & Albareda, L. (2016). Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5014–5021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldavanova, A., & Goerdel, H. T. (2018). Understanding the puzzle of organizational sustainability: Toward a conceptual framework of organizational social connectedness and sustainability. Public Management Review, 20(1), 55–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Conceptualizing, College Park, MD, USA (pp. 282–291).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolletti, M., Lutti, N., Souza, R., & Pagotto, L. (2019). Social and organizational learning in the adaptation to the process of climate change: The case of a Brazilian thermoplastic resins and petrochemical company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 748–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. (2009). Reconsidering the common good in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotakopoulos, P. D., Espinosa, A., & Walker, J. (2016). Sustainability management: Insights from the viable system model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 792–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, R., Roy, M., & St-Jacques, D. (2007). A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(6), 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pejic-Bach, M., & Ceric, V. (2007). Developing system dynamics with step-by-step approach. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 31(1), 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., Crona, B., Armitage, D. R., Olsson, P., Tengö, M., & Yudina, O. (2012). Adaptive comanagement: A Systematic review and analysis. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 11. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art11/#methodologic5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2007). A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Making the case for the competitive advantage of corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourdehnad, J., & Smith, P. A. C. (2012). Sustainability, organizational learning, and lessons learned from aviation. The Learning Organization, 19(1), 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Quairel-Lanoizelée, F. (2011). Are competition and corporate social responsibility compatible? The myth of sustainable competitive advantage. Society and Business Review, 6(1), 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ricciardi, F., Zardini, A., & Rossignoli, C. (2016). Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation: The triple paradox configuration. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5487–5493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, C. M., & Roset, C. (1986). The comedy of the commons : commerce, custom, and inherently public property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 53(3), 711–781. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Vijande, M. L., Lòpez-Sànchez, J. A., & Trespalacios, J. A. (2012). How organizational learning affects a firm’s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1079–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuttenberg, H. Z., & Guth, H. K. (2015). Seeking our shared wisdom : A framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D. (1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 137–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, K. (2006). An adaptive strategy for managing knowledge in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 72–80.
   Google Scholar
• Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. A. C. (2012). The importance of organizational learning for organizational sustainability. The Learning Organization, 19(1), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, J.-C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(SUPPL.WINTER), 5–9. Retrieved from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-3142609449&partnerID=40&md5=44191a5446add8136d4fa9ab0373982c
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change : A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1250–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, H., Vermeulen, P., Raaijmakers, A., & Mair, J. (2016). Market meets community: institutional logics as strategic resources for development work. Organization Studies, 37(5), 709–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergne, J.-P., & Durand, R. (2011). The path of most persistence: An evolutionary perspective on path dependence and dynamic capabilities. Organization Studies, 32(3), 365–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & McKeon, M. M. (2007). The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. In Online Communities and Social Computing (pp. 445–454). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_49
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, R. C., Kinzig, A., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijen, F. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present, and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 130–147). Sage Publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387
   Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. (2015). Co-productive governance: A relational framework for adaptive governance. Global Environmental Change, 30, 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(February2015), 339–351. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036014175&partnerID=40&md5=21dc1635bc5eb8e1560fd4a9c469e75a
   Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., & Neumann, K. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization and Environment, 26(3), 241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar