Organising knowledge generation and dissemination in the Dutch high-water protection programme – a sender-receiver approach

References

• Boland, R. J., Jr, & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, G. A., & Borchers, J. G. (2000). Uncertainty as information: Narrowing the science-policy gap. Conservation Ecology, 4 (1), 7. .consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art7/. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00174-040107.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: towards a unified view of working, learning an innovation, in. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2002). The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, A., Fasbender, U., & Deller, J. (2018). Being perceived as a knowledge sender or knowledge receiver: A multistudy investigation of the effect of age on knowledge transfer. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(3), 518–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. (1979). The two communities theory and knowledge. Utilization, American Behavorial Scientist, 22(3), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427902200308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Clarck, W. C., Alcock, A., Disckson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., & Mitchell, J. J. E. R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correljé, A.F., B. Broekhans, W. Roos (2010). Van Deltacommissie 1 tot Deltacommissie 2. Alleen kijken naar preventie of ook naar overstromingskansen? In: W. van der Most, S. de Wit, B. Broekhans and W. Roos (eds.). Delft: Eburon, 11–37.
   Google Scholar
• Delta Commission. (2008). Working together with water. In A living land builds for its future.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A Case for the Case Study. UNC Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. C., Nowotny, L. H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (eds.). (1994). The Production of New Knowledge – The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2017). Knowledge Management in Organizations: A critical introduction (4th edition ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem?. Knowledge, 1(4), 537–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708000100404.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. M., & Balasubramanian, P. (2003). KnowledgeScope: Managing knowledge in context. Decision Support Systems, 35(4), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00126-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer, R., & Delbecq, A. (1978). Organizational/environmental interchange: A model of boundary spanning activity. Academy of Management Review, 3(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4296354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin, L., Geng, X., & Whinston, A. B. (2005). A sender-receiver framework for knowledge transfer. MIS Quarterly, 29 (2), 197–219. Special Issue on Information. Technologies and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorderhaven, N., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Knowledge sharing and social interaction within MNCS. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G. (1997). Knowledge management: A strategic agenda. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90252-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholt, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Why a central network position isn’t enough: the role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2013). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate. Zoology, 1907-39(19), 387–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Google Scholar
• Trevillion, S. (1991). Caring in the community. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Tromp, E., & Bots, P. W. (2016). Knowledge transfer and uptake in design process of flood defences: case of kinderdijk-schoonhovenseveer. 17th european conference on knowledge management, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK (pp. 1–2).
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/255842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van, M. I., & Edelenbos, J. (2018). Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance – An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Edgar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachos, E. (1978). A conceptual model of the knowledge transfer process. In Proceedings of the second international conference of water resource knowledge, Fort Collins CO, Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weggeman, M. C. D. P. (1996). Knowledge management: The modus operandi for a learning organization. In J. Schreinemakers (Ed.), Knowledge Management: Organization, competence and methodology. Advances in knowledge management (pp. 175–188). Publisher Ergon Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1977). Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiewiora, A., Trigunarsyah, B., Murphy, G., & Liang, C. (2009). Barriers to effective knowledge transfer in project-based organisations. In R. McCaffer (ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on global innovation in construction (pp. 220–230). Loughborough University Science and Enterprise Park,Loughborough, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, F. (2003). Operational knowledge management: Identification of knowledge objects, operation methods, and goals and means for the support function. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2012). We are all boundary spanners now?. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293417.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Third Edition ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar