Organisational inertia and the dynamics of multiple organisational routines

References

• Aime, F., Humphrey, S., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aroles, J., & McLean, C. (2016). Rethinking stability and change in the study of organizational routines: Difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory. Organization Science, 27(3), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., & Singh, J. (1994). Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: Some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. In J. A. C. Baum & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J., & Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Wensley, A. K., & Polo, M. T. S. (2014). A conceptual framework for unlearning in a homecare setting. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.6
   Google Scholar
• Coch, L., & French, J. R. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(1), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674800100408
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5(4), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., & Winter, S. (1996). Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 653–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/5.3.653
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• D’Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 1325–1350. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H., & Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging “resistance to change”. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886399351003
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich, K., & Seidl, D. (2018). Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2008). Routine dynamics. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 302–315). Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In J. Howard-Grenville, C. Rerup, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Organizational routines: How they are created, maintained, and changed (pp. 23–46). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., & Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.656841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 10–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/258605
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, S., Lockwood, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1007645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J. A., Rerup, C., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2016). Introduction: Advancing a process perspective on routines by zooming out and zooming in. In J. Howard-Grenville, C. Rerup, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Organizational routines: How they are created, maintained, and changed (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J. A., & Rerup, C. (2017). A process perspective on organizational routines. In A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp. 323–339). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D., & Amburgey, T. L. (1991). Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.5465/256407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kremser, W., & Schreyögg, G. (2016). The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27(3), 698–721. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, A., & Nilakant, V. (2016). Knowledge integration mechanisms in high-technology business-to-business services vendors. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(4), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, A. (2014). The mutual constitution of persons and organizations: An ontological perspective on organizational change. Organization Science, 25(4), 1082–1110. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). Organizations: A quantum view. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moustaghfir, K. (2009). How knowledge assets lead to a sustainable competitive advantage: Are organizational capabilities a missing link? Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(4), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch, A. (2016). Bringing history into the study of routines: Contextualizing performance. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616634134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, culture and commitment. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (pp. 157–200). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozawa, K. (2013). Effects of organizational routine and interdepartmental interdependency on organizational inertia. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Commerce, (76), 45–63 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Parmigiani, A., & Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–453. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.589143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C., & Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1484–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. (2011). The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22(6), 1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce-Espinosa, G., Peiro-Signes, A., & Segarra-Oña, M. (2020). Absorptive capacity and in-company routines: Modelling knowledge creation in the tourism industry. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1796544
   Google Scholar
• Rerup, C., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61968107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1166. https://doi.org/10.5465/256669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., & Rerup, C. (2011). Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37(2), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310371691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., & Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 170–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217707738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, M. (2008). Staying on track: A voyage to the internal mechanisms of routine reproduction. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 228–255). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. M. (2012). The logic of deliberate structural inertia. Journal of Management, 38(2), 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309361206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P., & Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27(3), 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stene, E. O. (1940). An approach to a science of administration. American Political Science Review, 34(6), 1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948193
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F., & Fern, M. J. (2012). Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1407–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01061.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F., & Rindova, V. P. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F., & Rindova, V. P. (2018). Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1253–1280. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence andreorientation. In L. L. Cumming & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171–222). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, S., Knudsen, T., & Becker, M. C. (2016). Inertia in routines: A hidden source of organizational variation. Organization Science, 27(3), 782–800. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar