How to effectively communicate university patents: a framework based on signalling theory

References

• Agostini, L., Filippini, R., & Nosella, A. (2016). Protecting intellectual property to enhance firm performance: Does it work for SMEs? Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Gunther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Bönte, W., & Mahagaonkarc, P. (2012). Financial signaling by innovative nascent ventures: The relevance of patents and prototypes. Research Policy, 41(8), 1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00038-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigliardi, B., & Filippelli, S. (2022). Factors affecting the growth of academic oriented spin-offs. In Innovation strategies in the food industry (Second Edition) (pp. 53–72). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85203-6.00012-8
   Google Scholar
• Bigliardi, B., Filippelli, S., Passaro, R., & Quinto, I. (2022). Introducing the implementation of open innovation approaches by academic entrepreneurship as a viable solution to tackle the lack of resources. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu-Ortiz, F. J., Galeano, N., Mora-Castro, P., & Fangmeyer, J. J. (2017). Spreading academic entrepreneurship: Made in Mexico. Business Horizons, 60(4), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartaxo, R. M., & Godinho, M. M. (2017). How institutional nature and available resources determine the performance of technology transfer offices. Industry & Innovation, 24(7), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1264068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesaroni, F., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Trasferimento tecnologico e gestione della proprietà intellettuale nel sistema della ricerca in Italia. LEM (Laboratory of Economics and Management – Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies) Working Paper Series, I 2001/05, February.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, A., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2013). Patents as signals for startup financing. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 592–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupé, T. (2003). Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021626702728
   Google Scholar
• Cricelli, L., Grimaldi, M., Rogo, F., & Strazzullo, S. (2021). Patent ranking indicators: A framework for the evaluation of a patent portfolio. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 11(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2021.114619
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden, W. F., Crittenden, V. L., & Pierpont, A. (2015). Trade secrets: Managerial guidance for competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 58(6), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, L. P., & Dumez, H. (2015). Qualitative research revisited: Epistemology of a comprehensive approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business, 26(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.071822
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, A. D., & Alves, L. (2020). University-industry technology transfer: The commercialization of university’s patents. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(3), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1638741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, M. S., Ranjan, P., & Sharma, R. (2020). Valuation of patents in emerging economies: A renewal model-based study of Indian patents. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1668552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida, M. V., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2019). Developing a multi-criteria decision support system for evaluating knowledge transfer by higher education institutions. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1534533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, A. A., & Porto, G. S. (2018). Technology transfer management in the context of a developing country: Evidence from Brazilian universities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1514288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/256434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elia, G., Lerro, A., Passiante, G., & Schiuma, G. (2017). An intellectual capital perspective for business model innovation in technology-intensive industries: Empirical evidences from Italian spin-offs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0052-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C., & Ratten, V. J. (2019). The effects of technology transfers and institutional factors on economic growth: Evidence from Europe and Oceania. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1505–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09730-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., & Ringler, P. (2014). What patents are used as collateral? an empirical analysis of patent reassignment data. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X. M., Harrison, R. T., & Li, D. F. (2022). Venture capital investment in university spin-offs: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 74, 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gredel, D., Kramer, M., & Bend, B. (2012). Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: In-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies. Technovation, 32(9–10), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2020). Indexes of patent value: A systematic literature review and classification. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1638737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenland, E., & Dana, L. P. (2020). Qualitative methodologies and data collection methods: Toward increased rigour in management research (Vol. Vol. 1). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1142/11449
   Google Scholar
• Grönqvist, C. (2009). The private value of patents by patent characteristics: Evidence from Finland. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9067-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, J., & Castiaux, A. (2017). Contingent knowledge transfers in university–Industry R&D projects. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooi, R., & Wang, J. (2020). Research funding and academic engagement: A Singapore case. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1638739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hottenrott, H., Hall, B. H., & Czarnitzki, D. (2016). Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 25(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1076200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, D. H., & Ziedonis, R. (2013). Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial-firm patents. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, T. (2016). Early-stage fundraising of university spin-offs: A study through demand-site perspectives. Venture Capital, 18(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1229772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, S., Kansy, S., Mueller-Seitz, G., & Ringlstetter, M. (2009). Weblogs for organizational knowledge sharing and creation: A comparative case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2008.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. W. (2016). Knowledge withholding: Psychological hindrance to the innovation diffusion within an organization. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(1), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In D. D. Bergh & D. J. Ketchen, Eds. Building methodological bridges, research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 6). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. (pp. 201–235). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-8387(2011)0000006007
   Google Scholar
• Lawryshyn, Y., Collan, M., Luukka, P., & Fedrizzi, M. (2017). New procedure for valuing patents under imprecise information with a consensual dynamics model and a real options framework. Expert Systems with Applications, 86, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, B., Schiuma, G., & Neely, A. (2002). Assessing strategic knowledge assets in e-business. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 4(2–4), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2002.000119
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Stark, M. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan? International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604042377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, A. L., Jeffre, S. A., & Lévesque, B. (2011). Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndofor, H. A., & Levitas, E. (2004). Signaling the strategic value of knowledge. Journal of Management, 30(5), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netval. (2016) . Ricerca, valorizzazione dei risultati ed impatto. XIII Rapporto Netval.
   Google Scholar
• Netval. (2018) . La rete del trasferimento tecnologico si rafforza con la clinical innovation. XIV Rapporto Netval.
   Google Scholar
• Netval. (2021) . Investire sulla valorizzazione della ricerca per una resilienza generativa. XVII Rapporto Netval.
   Google Scholar
• Radko, N., Belitski, M., & Kalyuzhnova, Y. (2022). Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: The stakeholder approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09926-0
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, S. J., Veiga, P. M., & Fernandes, C. A. (2019). The knowledge transfer and cooperation between universities and enterprises. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1561166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower. Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
   Google Scholar
• Troise, C. (2022). Exploring knowledge visualization in the digital age: An analysis of benefits and risks. Management Decision, 60(4), 1116–1131. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2021-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., & Santoro, G. (2023). Equity crowdfunding for university spin-offs: Unveiling the motivations, benefits, and risks related to its adoption. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2182443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., Matricano, D., Sorrentino, M., & Candelo, E. (2022). Investigating investment decisions in equity crowdfunding: The role of projects’ intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 40(3), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., & Tani, M. (2021). Exploring entrepreneurial characteristics, motivations and behaviours in equity crowdfunding: Some evidence from Italy. Management Decision, 59(5), 995–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., Tani, M., Dinsmore, J. J., & Schiuma, G. (2021). Understanding the implications of equity crowdfunding on sustainability-oriented innovation and changes in agri-food systems: Insights into an open innovation approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 171, 120959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., Tani, M., & Jones, P. (2020). Investigating the impact of multidimensional social capital on equity crowdfunding performance. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M., & Brown, J. W. (1972). Profiles of the future monitoring for technological opportunities. Business Horizons, 15(5), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(72)90042-0
   Google Scholar
• Valkokari, K., Passi, J., & Rantala, T. (2012). Managing knowledge within networked innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2011.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkitachalam, K., & Ambrosini, V. (2017). A triadic link between knowledge management, information technology and business strategies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0043-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vismara, S. (2018). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 24(3), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12261
   Google Scholar
• Zakery, A., & Afrazeh, A. (2017). Analysing intellectual capital management and growth based on dynamic modeling. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0040-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar