Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery: a clinical update

References

• Gibbon JH Jr. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med. 1954;37(3):171–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gourlay T, Connolly P. Does cardiopulmonary bypass still represent a good investment? The biomaterials perspective. Perfusion. 2003;18(4):225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asimakopoulos G. Systemic inflammation and cardiac surgery: an update. Perfusion. 2001;16(5):353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paparella D, Yau TM, Young E. Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21(2):232–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy GJ, Angelini GD. Side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass: what is the reality? J Card Surg. 2004;19(6):481–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenni H, Rheinberger J, Czerny M, et al. Autotransfusion system or integrated automatic suction device in minimized extracorporeal circulation: influence on coagulation and inflammatory response. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(5):e139–e143.
   Google Scholar
• Remadi JP, Rakotoarivello Z, Marticho P, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC system) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized prospective trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128(3):436–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutschka I, Skorpil J, El Essawi A, et al. Beneficial effects of modern perfusion concepts in aortic valve and aortic root surgery. Perfusion. 2009;24(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Mitsuno M, Yamamura M, et al. Evaluation of closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for aortic valve replacement. ASAIO J. 2010;56(4):309–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momin A, Sharabiani M, Mulholland J, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: the Hammersmith technique. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remadi JP, Marticho P, Butoi I, et al. Clinical experience with the mini-extracorporeal circulation system: an evolution or a revolution? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(6):2172–2175; discussion 2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipp A, Foltan M, Thrum A, et al. MECC – a minimal ECC-system for coronary artery bypass procedures. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:A215.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenack C, Liebold A, Philipp A, et al. Four years’ experience with a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system and its influence on clinical outcome. Artif Organs. 2004;28(12):1082–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaislic C, Bical O, Farge C, et al. Totally minimized extracorporeal circulation: an important benefit for coronary artery bypass grafting in Jehovah’s witnesses. Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6(5):307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22(4):527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Rahman U, Ozaslan F, Risteski PS, et al. Initial experience with a minimized extracorporeal bypass system: is there a clinical benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(1):238–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghi C, Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, et al. Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system: results of a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(4):1396–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nollert G, Schwabenland I, Maktav D, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(6):2326–2332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulholland JW, Anderson JR. Preventing the loss of safety margins with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1952–1953;82(5):2006.
   Google Scholar
• Remadi JP, Rakotoarivelo Z, Marticho P, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra system or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J. 2006;151(1):198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immer FF, Ackermann A, Gygax E, et al. Minimal extracorporeal circulation is a promising technique for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(5):1515–1520; discussion 1521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybregts RA, Morariu AM, Rakhorst G, et al. Attenuated renal and intestinal injury after use of a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system. Ann Thorac Surg. 1760–1766;83(5):2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen M. Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg. 1766–1767;83(5):2007.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetto U, Luciani R, Goracci M, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass and acute kidney injury in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(2):529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan V, Ruel M. Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(2):535–536.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koivisto SP, Wistbacka JO, Rimpilainen R, et al. Miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion. 2010;25(2):65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimpilainen R, Hautala N, Koskenkari JK, et al. Minimized cardiopulmonary bypass reduces retinal microembolization: a randomized clinical study using fluorescein angiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puehler T, Haneya A, Philipp A, et al. Minimized extracorporeal circulation system in coronary artery bypass surgery: a 10-year single-center experience with 2243 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(4):459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman RM, Zijlstra JG, Kok WF, et al. Off-pump CABG surgery reduces systemic inflammation compared with on-pump surgery but does not change systemic endothelial responses: a prospective randomized study. Shock. 2014;42(2):121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi H, Umemoto T; All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence G. Worse long-term survival after off-pump than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1820–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Zhou J, Li H, et al. Comparison of graft patency between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an updated meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(4):1335–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlind K, Fenger-Gron M, Holme SJ, et al. Graft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is inferior even with identical heparinization protocols: results from the Danish On-pump Versus Off-pump Randomization Study (DOORS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1812–1819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei V, Nasso G, Salamone G, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery. Circulation. 1761–1767;116(16):2007.
   Google Scholar
• Formica F, Broccolo F, Martino A, et al. Myocardial revascularization with miniaturized extracorporeal circulation versus off pump: evaluation of systemic and myocardial inflammatory response in a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(5):1206–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puehler T, Haneya A, Philipp A, et al. Minimal extracorporeal circulation: an alternative for on-pump and off-pump coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):766–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetto U, Ng C, Frati G, et al. Miniaturized extracorporeal circulation versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2015;14:96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglioni A, Verzini A, Pappalardo F, et al. Minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):586–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglioni A, Verzini A, Colangelo N, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement: a randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(1):37–41; discussion 41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Issitt RW, Mulholland JW, Oliver MD, et al. Aortic surgery using total miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(2):627–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimarakis I, Stefanou D, Yarham G, et al. Total miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: the next step in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Perfusion. 2008;23(5):275–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Sjatskig J, van Boven WJ, et al. J-shaped versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circuit. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2011;45(6):379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bical OM, Fromes Y, Gaillard D, et al. Comparison of the inflammatory response between miniaturized and standard CPB circuits in aortic valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(5):699–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimpilainen R, Hautala N, Koskenkari J, et al. Comparison of the use of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass with conventional techniques on the incidence of retinal microemboli during aortic valve replacement surgery. Perfusion. 2011;26(6):479–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donndorf P, Park H, Vollmar B, et al. Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(2):211–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Sjatskig J, van Boven WJ, et al. Combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal closed circuit circulation versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11(6):754–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momin AU, Sharabiani MT, Kidher E, et al. Feasibility and safety of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass in major aortic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(4):659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palombo D, Valenti D, Gaggiano A, et al. Early experience with the minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(3):324–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiiya N, Matsuzaki K, Kunihara T, et al. Use of a soft reservoir bag in a fully heparin-coated closed-loop cardiopulmonary bypass system for distal aortic perfusion during aortic surgery. J Artif Organs. 2005;8(2):85–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjatskig J, Yilmaz A, van Boven JW, et al. Feasibility of mitral valve surgery using minimal extracorporeal circulation. Perfusion. 2012;27(4):264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes P, MacDonald J, Cleland A, et al. The use of a mini bypass circuit for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Perfusion. 2009;24(3):163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiadis K, Chalvatzoulis O, Antonitsis P, et al. Use of minimized extracorporeal circulation system in noncoronary and valve cardiac surgical procedures-a case series. Artif Organs. 2011;35(10):960–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumbach H, Rustenbach C, Michaelsen J, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(1):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makdisi G, Makdisi PB, Wang IW. New horizons of non-emergent use of extracorporeal membranous oxygenator support. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(4):76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seco M, Forrest P, Jackson SA, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for very high-risk transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23(10):957–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello SD, Boukhris M, Ganyukov V, et al. Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for complex high-risk elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a single-center experience. Heart Lung. 2015;44(4):309–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiadis K, Hadjimiltiades S, Antonitsis P. Successful high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the use of minimal extracorporeal circulation system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(5):845–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancari F, Rimpilainen R. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of miniaturised versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Heart. 2009;95(12):964–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangrillo A, Garozzo FA, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improves short-term outcome in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(5):1162–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harling L, Warren OJ, Martin A, et al. Do miniaturized extracorporeal circuits confer significant clinical benefit without compromising safety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ASAIO J. 2011;57(3):141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Haidich AB, et al. Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2013;164(2):158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiadis K, Fragoulakis V, Antonitsis P, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation; an economic analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(6):5336–5343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaydin S, Sari T, McCusker K, et al. Clinical evaluation of minimized extracorporeal circulation in high-risk coronary revascularization: impact on air handling, inflammation, hemodilution and myocardial function. Perfusion. 2009;24(3):153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteriou C, Antonitsis P, Argiriadou H, et al. Minimal extracorporeal circulation reduces the incidence of postoperative major adverse events after elective coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients. A single-institutional prospective randomized study. Perfusion. 2013;28(4):350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline, Task F, Ferraris VA, et al. Update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(3):944–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BA, Fiorentino F, Reeves BC, et al. Mini bypass and proinflammatory leukocyte activation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1454–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar