Contemporary techniques in percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions

References

• Grundeken MJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Ishibashi Y, et al. First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(7):E248-60.
   Google Scholar
• Gao X-F, Zhang Y-J, Tian N-L, et al. Stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of nine randomised trials and systematic review. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:561–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milasinovic D, Wijns W, Ntsekhe M, et al. Step-by-step manual for planning and performing bifurcation PCI: a resource-tailored approach. EuroIntervention. 2018;13:e1804–e1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escaned J, Collet C, Ryan N, et al. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3124–3134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modolo R, Collet C, Chichareon P, et al. Clinical outcomes with the state-of- the-art approach for treating bifurcation lesions in the SYNTAX II trial. EuroPCR. 2018; Paris. Available from: https://www.pcronline.com/Cases-resources-images/Resources/Course-videos-slides/2018/Imaging-for-valve-intervention-part-1?auth=true. Last access 26/09/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Flensted LJ, Burzotta F, Banning AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European bifurcation club. EuroIntervention. 2018;13:1540–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaya FJ, Lefèvre T, Chevalier B, et al. Contemporary approach to coronary bifurcation lesion treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1861–1878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet C, Onuma Y, Cavalcante R, et al. Quantitative angiography methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement update from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Kassab GS, Finet G, et al. Bench testing and coronary artery bifurcations: a consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;13:e1794–e1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girasis C, Onuma Y, Schuurbiers JCH, et al. Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the european bifurcation club. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79:361–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, et al. Bifurcation lesions: functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:817–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev D, Dosev L, Collet C, et al. Intracoronary electrocardiogram to guide percutaneous interventions in coronary bifurcations - a proof of concept: the FIESTA (Ffr vs. IcEcgSTA) study. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:e530–e537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Jing J, Holm NR, et al. In vivo assessment of bifurcation optimal viewing angles and bifurcation angles by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1617–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernández Hernandez F, Alfonso F, et al. Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions: results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto N, Hoshino Y, Mizukami H, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of acute side branch occlusion in coronary artery bifurcation lesions just after single stent crossover. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;87:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato E, Carrié D, Dardas P, et al. European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JJ, Chun EJ, Cho Y-S, et al. Potential predictors of side-branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention: a coronary CT angiography study. Radiology. 2014;271:711–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S-L, Sheiban I, Xu B, et al. Impact of the complexity of bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents: the DEFINITION study (definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using drug-eluting steNts). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:1266–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang -J-J, Gao X-F, Han Y-L, et al. Treatment effects of systematic two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: rationale and design of a prospective, randomised and multicentre DEFINITION II trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the nordic bifurcation study. Circulation. 2006;114:1955–1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (coronary bifurcations: application of the crushing technique using sirolimus-eluting stents) study. Circulation. 2009;119:71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British bifurcation coronary study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation. 2010;121:1235–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J. 2004;148:857–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle R-P, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2859–2867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behan MW, Holm NR, Curzen NP, et al. Simple or complex stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions : a patient-level pooled-analysis of the nordic bifurcation study and the british bifurcation coronary study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeng M, Holm NR, Erglis A, et al. Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: nordic bifurcation study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:e44–e122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ascenzo F, Iannaccone M, Giordana F, et al. Provisional vs. two-stent technique for unprotected left main coronary artery disease after ten years follow up: a propensity matched analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;211:37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Généreux P, Kumsars I, Lesiak M, et al. A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:533–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundeken MJ, Généreux P, Wykrzykowska JJ, et al. The tryton side branch stent. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:V145–V146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foin N, Sen S, Allegria E, et al. Maximal expansion capacity with current DES platforms: a critical factor for stent selection in the treatment of left main bifurcations? EuroIntervention. 2013;8:1315–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho S, Kang TS, Kim J-S, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes and optimal stent strategy in left main coronary bifurcation stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1247–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piroth Z, Toth GG, Tonino PAL, et al. Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve measured immediately after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-J, Ge Z, Kan J, et al. Cutoff value and long-term prediction of clinical events by FFR measured immediately after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: 1- to 3-year results from the DKCRUSH VII registry study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:986–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S-L, Ye F, Zhang -J-J, et al. Randomized comparison of FFR-guided and angiography-guided provisional stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH-VI trial (double kissing crush versus provisional stenting technique for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions VI). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:536–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, et al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography–guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:2488–2498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Ascenzo F, Chieffo A, Cerrato E, et al. Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with second-generation drug-eluting stents (from failure in left main study with 2nd generation stents–cardiogroup iii study). Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:978–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S-J, Kim Y-H, Park D-W, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Members AF, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularizationThe task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society Of Cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–2619.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Song H, et al. Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:562–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2018;53:34–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1243–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foin N, Secco GG, Ghilencea L, et al. Final proximal post-dilatation is necessary after kissing balloon in bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finet G, Derimay F, Motreff P, et al. Comparative analysis of sequential proximal optimizing technique versus kissing balloon inflation technique in provisional bifurcation stenting: fractal coronary bifurcation bench test. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1308–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniadis AP, Mortier P, Kassab G, et al. Biomechanical modeling to improve coronary artery bifurcation stenting: expert review document on techniques and clinical implementation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1281–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiastra C, Grundeken MJ, Collet C, et al. Biomechanical impact of wrong positioning of a dedicated stent for coronary bifurcations: a virtual bench testing study. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2018;9:415–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariki H, Shinke T, Otake H, et al. Potential benefit of final kissing balloon inflation after single stenting for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. Circ J. 2013;77:1193–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundeken MJ, Chiastra C, Wu W, et al. Differences in rotational positioning and subsequent distal main branch rewiring of the tryton stent: an optical coherence tomography and computational study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 1–10. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foin N, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Nakatani S, et al. Incomplete stent apposition causes high shear flow disturbances and delay in neointimal coverage as a function of strut to wall detachment distance implications for the management of incomplete stent apposition. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:180–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzizisis YS. FLOW ISR Study: patient-specific bifurcation stenting simulations. Eur Bifurc Club. 2017; Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S-L, Zhang -J-J, Han Y, et al. Double kissing crush versus provisional stenting for left main distal bifurcation lesions: DKCRUSH-V randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2605–2617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S-L, Santoso T, Zhang J-J, et al. Clinical outcome of double kissing crush versus provisional stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the 5-year follow-up results from a randomized and multicenter DKCRUSH-II study (randomized study on double kissing crush technique versus provisi. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e004497–e004497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S-L, Xu B, Han Y-L, et al. Comparison of double kissing crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1482–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar