FFR_CT derived from computed tomography angiography: the experience in the UK

References

• Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–2336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis. NICE Guidelines. 2010 Mar; [cited 2018 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg95
   Google Scholar
• Newby D, Adamson P, Berry C, et al. Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 25;379:924–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–1732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1291–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darlington M, Gueret P, Laissy J-P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive coronary angiography. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;16:647–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisz FP, Merlin T, Moss J, et al. The pre-test risk stratified cost-effectiveness of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in the detection of significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients otherwise referred to invasive coronary angiography. Heart Lung Circ. 2009;18:200–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703–1708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF. Tonino P a L et al. FAME 2 Yr Follow Up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. DEFER 2001. Circulation. 2001;103:2928–2934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: web addenda. Eur Heart J. 2014;2014(35):2541–2619.
   Google Scholar
• Choy JS, Kassab GS. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1281–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo Y, Kassab GS. Scaling laws of coronary circulation in health and disease. J Biomech. 2016;49:2531–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RF, Wyche K, B V C, et al. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation. 1990;82:1595–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2233–2241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography clinical data and scientific principles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1209–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang CL, Alcock R, Pilkington N, et al. Determining the haemodynamic significance of arterial stenosis: the relationship between CT angiography, computational fluid dynamics, and non-invasive fractional flow reserve. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geer J, Sandstedt M, Björkholm A, et al. Software-based on-site estimation of fractional flow reserve using standard coronary CT angiography data. Acta radiol. 2016;57:1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton SM, Tesche C. De Cecco et al. Noninvasive Derivation of Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography. J Thoracic Imaging. 2018 Mar;1(332):88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Baumann S, et al. Coronary CT angiography–derived fractional flow reserve: machine learning algorithm versus computational fluid dynamics modeling. Radiology. 2018:171291.
   Google Scholar
• Kato M, Hirohata K, Kano A et al. Fast Ct-Ffr analysis method for the coronary artery based on 4d-ct image analysis and structural and fluid analysis. In: Proceedings of the Asme International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Texas, USA, 2015; 3
   Google Scholar
• Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of ischemia-causing stenoses obtained via noninvasive fractional flow reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1989–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308:1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipsic J, Yang TH, Thompson A, et al. CT Angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the determination of fractional flow reserve by anatomic CTA (DEFACTO) study. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:989–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1303–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, et al. Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology. 2015;274:674–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen A, Kim YH, Kruk M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a machine-learning approach to coronary computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve: result from the MACHINE consortium. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018 Jun;11:e007217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko BS, Cameron JD, Munnur RK, et al. Noninvasive CT-derived FFR based on structural and fluid analysis: a comparison with invasive FFR for detection of functionally significant stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:663–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann S, Renker M, Hetjens S, et al. Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived vs invasive fractional flow reserve assessment: meta-analysis with subgroup evaluation of intermediate stenosis. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:1402–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Tang X, Peng L, et al. The diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve for evaluation of myocardial ischaemia confirmed by invasive fractional flow reserve: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:476–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page AE, Sashittal SG, Chatzizacharias NA, et al. The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Medicine. 2015 Nov;94:46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulla J, Pedersen KS, Budoff M, et al. Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr 1;28:943–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, et al. Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease: a substudy of the NXT trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015 Sep;1(8):1045–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Collet C, Miyazaki Y, Ryan N, et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomographic angiography in patients with multivessel CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun;11(71):2756–2769.
   Google Scholar
• Sand NP, Veien KT, Nielsen SS, et al. PRrospEctive comparison of FFR derived from coronary CT angiography with SPECT perfusion imaging in stable coronary ArtEry DiSeaSe: the ReASSESS study. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018;13:2644.
   Google Scholar
• Driessen RS, Danad I, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. 1185 Head-to-head comparison of FFR-CT against coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of ischaemia. Eur Heart J. 2018 Aug 1;39:ehy565–1185.
   Google Scholar
• Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JW, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 2017 Apr;1(38):991–998.
   Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Gormsen LC, Bøtker HE, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging versus computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with intermediate‐range coronary lesions: influence on downstream diagnostic workflows and invasive angiography findings. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug;22(6):e005587.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:435–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller Jensen J, Erik Bøtker H, Norling Mathiassen O, et al. Computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris: influence on downstream rate of invasive coronary angiography. European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017 Apr;20(19):405–414.
   Google Scholar
• Curzen NP, Nolan J, Zaman AG, et al. Does the routine availability of CT-derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone?: the FFRCTRIPCORD study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1188–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Hjort J, Gaur S, et al. Clinical use of coronary CTA-derived FFR for decision-making in stable CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:541–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS, et al. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;12:2254.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn TA, Nieman K, Akasaka T, et al. Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE registry. European Heart Journal. 2018:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Terkelsen CJ, Mathiassen ON, et al. Clinical outcomes using coronary CT angiography and FFRCT-guided management of stable chest pain patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2123-2134.
   Google Scholar
• Kim K-H, Doh J-H, Koo B-K, et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;124:779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi G, Lee JM, Kim HJ, et al. Coronary artery axial plaque stress and its relationship with lesion geometry application of computational fluid dynamics to coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1156–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J, Rochitte C, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. New England J Med. 2008;359:2324–2336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Cag VM, et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1658–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde JJ, Kofoed KF, Sørgaard M, et al. Cardiac computed tomography guided treatment strategy in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: results from the randomised, controlled trial: cArdiac cT in the treatment of acute CHest pain (CATCH). Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5257–5262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, et al. Coronary CT angiography for suspected ACS in the era of high-sensitivity troponins randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. The RAPID-CCTA trial (Rapid ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEase with CCTA) – a multicentre parallel-group randomised trial to compare early computerised tomography coronary angiography versus standard care in patients presenting with suspected or confirmed acute coronary syndrome: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajani R, Webb J, Marciniak A, et al. Comparative efficacy testing – Ffractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography for the evaluation of patients with stable chest pain. Int J Cardiol. 2015;183:173–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. HeartFlow FFRCT for estimating fractional flow reserve from coronary CT angiography. 2016 [cited 2018 Oct 18]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/GID-MT252/documents/consultation-document.
   Google Scholar
• Dreisbach J, Nicol E. Roobottom et al. (2017). Challenges in delivering computed tomography coronary angiography as the first-line test for stable chest pain. Heart. 2018;104:921–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard B, Leipsic J, Bk K, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography derived fractional flow reserve and plaque stress. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2016;9:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS, et al. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:1350–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kueh SH, Mooney J, Ohana M, et al. Flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography reclassification rate using value distal to lesion compared to lowest value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Nov;1(11):462–467.
   Google Scholar
• Gaur S, Taylor CA, Jensen JM, et al. FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in nonculprit lesions of patients with recent STEMI. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017 Apr;3(10):424–433.
   Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. The Task Force on the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Revista Española De Cardiología. 2014 Feb;1(67):135.
   Google Scholar