The pulseless radial artery in transradial catheterization: challenges and solutions

References

• Rao SV, Hess CN, Barham B, et al. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for women (study of access site for enhancement of PCI for Women) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(8):857–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok MM, Weernink MGM, von Birgelen C, et al. Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: the PREVAS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(1):17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamas MA, Tosh J, Hulme W, et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in England during changes in practice: insights from the British cardiovascular interventional society. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(5):e004482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandie S, Mehta SR, Cantor WJ, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography/intervention in women with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the RIVAL trial (radial Vs femoral access for coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(4):505–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andò G, Capodanno D. Radial access reduces mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from an updated trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(7):660–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(14):1419–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1269–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka M, Shiode N, Nakao Y, et al. Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018;33(1):62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelev L, Surchev L. Radial artery coursing behind the biceps brachii tendon: significance for the transradial catheterization and a clinically oriented classification of the radial artery variations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(5):1008–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen MAH, Hollander MR, van der Heijden DJ, et al. The ACRA anatomy study (assessment of disability after coronary procedures using radial access): a comprehensive anatomic and functional assessment of the vasculature of the hand and relation to outcome after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(11):e005753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugh SK, Chugh S, Chugh Y, et al. Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(1):64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abazid RM, Smettei OA, Mohamed MZ, et al. Radial artery ultrasound predicts the success of transradial coronary angiography. Cardiol J. 2017;24(1):9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu-Fadel MS, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (radial artery access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):283–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa Pacha H, Alahdab F, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2018;204:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav P, Baquero GA, Gilchrist IC. Use of vascular ultrasound guidance in obtaining access for transradial coronary angiogram in patients with advanced shock. Cath Lab Digest. 2018;21(11). [accessed 2019 Sep 10]. https://www.cathlabdigest.com/articles/Use-Vascular-Ultrasound-Guidance-Obtaining-Access-Transradial-Coronary-Angiogram-Patients-A.
   Google Scholar
• Pancholy SB. Palamaner Subash Shantha G, Romagnoli Eet al.. Impact of access site choice on outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2015;170(2):353–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roule V, Lemaitre A, Sabatier R, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;108(11):563–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andò G, Tripodi R, Vizzari G, et al. Calcific Mönckeberg’s arteriosclerosis: an uncommon cause of radial access failure. Int J Cardiol. 2015;182:211–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyaz U, Haq M, Rashid M, et al. Incidence and clinical course of limb dysfunction post cardiac catheterization- a systematic review. Circ J. 2018;82(11):2736–2744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden DJ, van Leeuwen MAH, Ritt MJPF, et al. Chronic radial artery occlusion does not cause exercise induced hand ischemia. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(6):949–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell A, Fujisawa T, Mills NL, et al. Endothelial progenitor cell biology and vascular recovery following transradial cardiac catheterization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(11):e006610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Lee T, et al. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening by optical coherance tomography. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1608–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Ida H, et al. Intima –media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1109–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniloae CS, Mody KP, Sanghvi K, et al. Histopathologic changes of the radial artery wall secondary to transradial catheterization. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5(3):527–532.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batchelor W, Dahya V, McGee D, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution ultrasound characterization of access site trauma and intimal hyperplasia following use of a 7F sheathless guide versus 6F sheath/guide combination for transradial artery PCI: results of the PRAGMATIC trial. Am Heart J. 2018;198:75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A, et al. Impact Of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in japanese and non-japanese patients. a substudy from RAP and BEAT (radial artery patency and bleeding, efficacy, adverse event) randomised multicenter trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(5):844–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroff AR, Fernandez C, Vidovich MI, et al. Contemporary transradial access practices: results of the second international survey. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(7):1276–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand OF1, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(10):1022–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlemann M, Möbius-Winkler S, Mende M, et al. The leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahalis G, Aznaouridis K, Tsigkas G, et al. Radial artery and ulnar artery occlusions following coronary procedures and the impact of anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (radial and ulnar artery occlusion meta-analysIS) systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):e005430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholy SB, Bernat I, Bertrand OF, et al. Prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: the PROPHET-II randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):1992–1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangoisse V, Guédès A, Chenu P, et al. Usefulness of a gentle and short hemostasis using the transradial band device after transradial access for percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions to reduce the radial artery occlusion rate (from the prospective and randomized CRASOC I, II, and III studies). Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(3):374–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome radial artery access in acute coronary syndromes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e000035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, et al. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72(3):335–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubero JM, Lombardo J, Pedrosa C, et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(4):467–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutouzis MJ, Maniotis CD, Avdikos G, et al. ULnar artery transient compression facilitating radial artery patent hemostasis (ULTRA): a novel technique to reduce radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(11):451–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Rokyta R, et al. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(11):1698–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian J, Chu YS, Sun J, et al. Ulnar artery compression: a feasible and effective approach to prevent the radial artery occlusion after coronary intervention. Chin Med J. 2015;128:795–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsecchi O, Nardin M, Vassileva A, et al. Transulnar recanalization of a chronic radial artery occlusion. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(7):504–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babunashvili A, Dundua D. Recanalization and reuse of early occluded radial artery within 6 days after previous transradial diagnostic procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:530–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzsa Z, Kovács N, Merkely B. Retrograde subintimal recanalization of a radial artery occlusion after coronary angiography using the palmar loop technique. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:259–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholy SB. Transradial access in an occluded radial artery: new technique. J Invasive Cardio. 2007;l19:541–544.
   Google Scholar
• Jaradat Z, Basir B, Revtyak G. Treatment of radial artery occlusions using balloon angioplasty and localized intra-arterial abciximab. J IntervCardiol. 2014;27(2):217–222.
   Google Scholar
• Zankl AR, Andrassy M, Volz C, et al. Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99(12):841–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammos C, Burghardt A, Lortz J, et al. Impact of anticoagulation and vasoactive medication on regained radial artery patency after catheterization: a case-control study. Eur J Med Res. 2018;23(1):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte-Hermes M, Klein-Wiele O, Vorpahl M, et al. Feasibility of transradial access for coronary interventions via percutaneous angioplasty of the radial artery in cases of functional radial occlusion. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30(10):355–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutouzis M, Ziakas A, Didagelos M, et al. Ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery cannulation during the same coronary catheterization procedure. Hippokratia. 2016;20(3):249–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostoni P, Zuffi A, Faurie B, et al. Same wrist intervention via the cubital (ulnar) artery in case of radial puncture failure for percutaneous cardiac catheterization or intervention: the multicenter SWITCH registry. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(1):52–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh SK, Cheng CI, Fang HY, et al. Feasibility and safety of transulnar catheterization in ipsilateral radial artery occlusion. Int Heart J. 2017;58(3):313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, et al. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):E51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutouzis M, Maniotis C, Agelaki M, et al. approach for coronary catheterization in patients with a harvested ipsilateral radial artery: A case series. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(5):364–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar S. Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons, anatomical considerations, and comprehensive literature review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90(7):1126–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattur S, Singh M, Kaluski E. Trans-ulnar catheterization and coronary interventions: from technique to outcomes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(4):299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez R, Zaky F, Ekmejian A, et al. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(7):1273–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). Euro Intervention. 2017;13(7):851–857.
   Google Scholar
• Sgueglia GA, Di Giorgio A, Gaspardone A, et al. Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(20):2113–2119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(8):678–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin MR, Banerjee SK, Biswas E, et al. Feasibility and safety of distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography and intervention. Mymensingh Med J. 2019;28(3):647–654.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alkhawam H, Windish S, Abo-Salem E. Distal radial artery access among cases with radial artery occlusion for primary percutaneous intervention. Future Cardiol. 2019;15(3):169–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies RE, Gilchrist IC. Dorsal (distal) transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019;8(2):111–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadjivassiliou A, Kiemeneij F, Nathan S, et al. Ultrasound-guided access of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter-based vascular interventions: a technical guide. EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 6. pii: EIJ-D-19-00555. doi: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00555. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Gatzopoulos D, Rigatou A, Kontopodis E, et al. Alternative access site choice after initial radial access site failure for coronary angiography and intervention. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018;15(9):585–590.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damluji AA, Nelson DW, Valgimigli M, et al. Transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention: a collaboration of international cardiovascular societies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(22):2269–2279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar