Meta-analysis of minimalist versus standard care approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

References

• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotronias RA, Teitelbaum M, Webb JG, et al. Early versus standard discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interventions. 2018;11(17):1759–1771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldalati O, Keshavarzi F, Kaura A, et al. Factors associated with safe early discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cardiol J. 2018;25(1):14–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallikethi-Reddy S, Akintoye E, Telila T, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United States: predictors of early hospital discharge. J Interv Cardiol. 2017;30(2):149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serletis-Bizios A, Durand E, Cellier G, et al. A prospective analysis of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118(6):866–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbanti M, Capranzano P, Ohno Y, et al. Early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2015;101(18):1485–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attizzani GF, Patel SM, Dangas GD, et al. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia following transfemoral transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation (from the Transcatheter Valve Therapeutics Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(3):419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villablanca PA, Mohananey D, Ramakrishna H. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(5):1018–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbar A, Khurana A, Mohammed A, et al. Local versus general anesthesia in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118(11):1712–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood DA, Lauck SB, Cairns JA, et al. The vancouver 3M (multidisciplinary, multimodality, but minimalist) clinical pathway facilitates safe next-day discharge home at low-, medium-, and high-volume transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement centers: the 3M TAVR Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interventions. 2019;12(5):459–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Consort MD. 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. 2010;4(1):e60–8. Open medicine: a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaliaros V, Devireddy C, Lerakis S, et al. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interventions. 2014;7(8):898–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attizzani GF, Alkhalil A, Padaliya B, et al. Comparison of outcomes of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a minimally invasive versus conventional strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(11):1731–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condado JF, Haider MN, Lerakis S, et al. Does minimalist transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement produce better survival in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(4):775–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurevich S, Oestreich B, Kelly RF, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a minimalist approach. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions. 2018;19(2):192–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoba S, Yamamoto M, Shioda K, et al. Safety and efficacy of minimalist approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interventioN-Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;26(3):420–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droppa M, Borst O, Katzenberger T, et al. Comparison of safety and periprocedural complications of transfemoral aortic valve replacement under local anaesthesia: minimalist versus complete Heart Team. EuroIntervention. 2019;14(18):e1819–e25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevre G, Jegou A, Dambrin G, et al. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed with a minimally invasive simplified Technique: “FAST” versus a standard approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019;31(10):300–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panhwar MS, Li J, Zidar DA, et al. Outcomes among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: minimally invasive strategy versus conventional strategy. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019;31(3):15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier A, Hammerich B, Humburger F, et al. A logistic regression analysis comparing minimalistic approach and intubation anaesthesia in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. PloS One. 2020;15(2):e0227345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne J, Higgins J, Reeves B on behalf of the development group for ACROBAT-NRSI. A Cochrane Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool: for non-randomized studies of interventions (ACROBAT-NRSI), Version 1.0. 0, 24 September 2014. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Frohlich GM, Lansky AJ, Webb J, et al. Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)–systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maas EH, Pieters BM, Van De Velde M, et al. General or local anesthesia for TAVI? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(13):1868–1878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke OS, Bracken-Clarke D, Segurado R, et al. Is local anesthesia the optimum strategy in retrograde transcatheter aortic valve implantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(6):489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villablanca PA, Mohananey D, Nikolic K, et al. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(2):330–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Kurz T, Feistritzer HJ, et al. General versus local anesthesia with conscious sedation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomized SOLVE-TAVI trial. Circulation 2020;142(15):1437–1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar