New tools to reduce radiation exposure during aortic endovascular procedures

References

• Volodos NL, Karpovich IP, Troyan VI, et al. Clinical experience of the use of self-fixing synthetic prostheses for remote endoprosthetics of the thoracic and the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries through the femoral artery and as intraoperative endoprosthesis for aorta reconstruction. Vasa Suppl. 1991;33. 93–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5(6):491–499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swerdlow NJ, Wu WW, Schermerhorn ML. Open and Endovascular Management of Aortic Aneurysms. Circ Res. 2019;124(4):647–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrendt C-A, Sedrakyan A, Rieß HC, et al. Short-term and long-term results of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Germany. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(6):1704–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards ST, Schermerhorn ML, O’Malley AJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(3):575–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son S-A, Jung H, Cho JY. Long-term outcomes of intervention between open repair and endovascular aortic repair for descending aortic pathologies: a propensity-matched analysis. BMC Surg. 2020;20:266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko S, Kang S, Ha M, et al. Health effects from occupational radiation exposure among fluoroscopy-guided interventional medical workers: a systematic review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29:353–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang FR, Loganovsky K. Low dose or low dose rate ionizing radiation-induced health effect in the human. J Environ Radioact. 2018;192:32–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketteler ER, Brown KR. Radiation exposure in endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1):35S–38S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zoli S, Trabattoni P, Dainese L, et al. Cumulative radiation exposure during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair and subsequent follow-up. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2012;42:254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindyal S, Rahman S, Kyriakides C. Review of the use of ionizing radiation in endovascular aneurysm repair. Angiology. 2015;66(7):607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudeketting SR, Heinen SGH, Ünlü Ç, et al. Pros and cons of 3D image fusion in endovascular aortic repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:595–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad W, Hasselmann H-C, Galas N, et al. Image fusion using the two-dimensional-three-dimensional registration method helps reduce contrast medium volume, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time in hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repairs. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(4):1003–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally MM, Scali ST, Feezor RJ, et al., Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 61(2): 309–316. 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ruiter QMB, Moll FL, van Herwaarden JA. Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:256–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, et al. Flexible robotics with electromagnetic tracking improves safety and efficiency during in vitro endovascular navigation. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:530–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herwaarden JA, Jansen MM, Vonken EPA, et al. First in human clinical feasibility study of endovascular navigation with Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) technology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61:317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Bmj. 2009;339:b2535–b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochennec F, Riga C, Hamady M, et al. Improved catheter navigation with 3D electromagnetic guidance. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condino S, Calabrò EM, Alberti A, et al. Simultaneous tracking of catheters and guidewires: comparison to standard fluoroscopic guidance for arterial cannulation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Dahl T, et al. Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(1):70–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tystad Lund K, Tangen GA, Manstad-Hulaas F. Electromagnetic navigation versus fluoroscopy in aortic endovascular procedures: a phantom study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(1):51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad W, Obeidi Y, Majd P, et al. The 2D-3D registration method in image fusion is accurate and helps to reduce the used contrast medium, radiation, and procedural time in standard EVAR procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;51:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias NV, Billberg H, Sonesson B, et al. The effects of combining fusion imaging, low-frequency pulsed fluoroscopy, and low-concentration contrast agent during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:1147–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra ML, Eagleton MJ, Greenberg RK, et al. Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endografting. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka A, Shiraya S, Chikazawa G, et al. Feasibility of three-dimensional fusion imaging with multimodality roadmap system during endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1175–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangenberg L, Shuja F, Carelsen B, et al. A novel tool for three-dimensional roadmapping reduces radiation exposure and contrast agent dose in complex endovascular interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:448–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacher V, Lin M, Desgranges P, et al. Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1698–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beaufort LM, Nasr B, Corvec Le T, et al. Automated image fusion guidance during endovascular aorto-iliac procedures: a randomized controlled pilot study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;75:86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertault A, Maurel B, Sobocinski J, et al. Impact of hybrid rooms with image fusion on radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:382–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls AE, Rosen S, Constantinou J, et al. Introduction of a team based approach to radiation dose reduction in the enhancement of the overall radiation safety profile of FEVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52:451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer AM, de Haan MW, Peppelenbosch AG, et al. CTA with fluoroscopy image fusion guidance in endovascular complex aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47:349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecoraro F, Bracale UM, Farina A, et al. Single-center experience and preliminary results of intravascular ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;56:209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi C, Tercero C, Wu X, et al. Real-time in vitro intravascular reconstruction and navigation for endovascular aortic stent grafting. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2016;12:648–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Hamady MS, et al. Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:799–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, et al. Electromagnetic tracking of flexible robotic catheters enables “assisted navigation” and brings automation to endovascular navigation in an in vitro study. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:1274–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäckle S, Eixmann T, Schulz-Hildebrandt H, et al. Fiber optical shape sensing of flexible instruments for endovascular navigation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14(12):2137–2145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra A, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM, et al. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(3):702–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg JC. Three-dimensional image overlay to assist endovascular procedures. Vasc Dis Manag. 2013;10:E179–E184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Ruiter QM, Gijsberts CM, Hazenberg CE, et al. Radiation awareness for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the [hybrid operating room. an instant patient risk chart for daily practice. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:425–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7):S263–S273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar