Robotic magnetic-guided catheter ablation in patients with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and pooled analysis

References

• Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet. 2000;356(9234):975–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghai A, Harris L, Harrison DA, et al. Outcomes of late atrial tachyarrhythmias in adults after the Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(2):585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Siu SC, Hussain F, et al. Sustained atrial arrhythmias in adults late after repair of tetralogy of fallot. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(5):584–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot NM, Lukac P, Schalij MJ, et al. Long-term outcome of ablative therapy of post-operative atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with tetralogy of Fallot: a European multi-centre study. Europace. 2012;14(4):522–527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khairy P, Van Hare GF, Balaji S, et al. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the recognition and management of arrhythmias in adult congenital heart disease: developed in partnership between the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of PACES, HRS, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD). Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(10):e102–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arya S, Kaji AH, Boermeester MA. PRISMA reporting guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(8):789–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(14):e698–e800.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2016;133(14):e471–505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, et al. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(11):974–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst S, Chun JULIANKR, Koektuerk B, et al. Magnetic navigation and catheter ablation of right atrial ectopic tachycardia in the presence of a hemi-azygos continuation: a magnetic navigation case using 3D electroanatomical mapping. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(1):99–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu J, Pflaumer A, Deisenhofer I, et al. Mapping of atrial tachycardia by remote magnetic navigation in postoperative patients with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(7):751–759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skoda J NP, Popelova J, Petru J, et al. Catheter ablation of intraatrial reentry tachycardia via transhepatic approach in complex congenital heart disease patient with single ventricle physiology and inferior vena cava interruption. Europace editor. EHRA 2011. Madrid (Spain): Oxford University Press; June 2011
   Google Scholar
• Akca F, Bauernfeind T, Witsenburg M, et al. Acute and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation in patients with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(3):409–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boolani H, Madhu Reddy Y, Baryun E, et al. Remote Magnetic Navigation System Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Intra Atrial Reentrant Tachycardia in Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries. J Atr Fibrillation. 2012;5(2):522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oglesby C, Berman AE. CT image integration facilitates remote magnetic navigation guided catheter ablation of intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia in a patient with D-TGA and remote prior mustard repair: the role of pre-ablation imaging in a unique patient population. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:S52.
   Google Scholar
• Hügl B, Velikan D, Buchter B, et al. Managing difficult anatomy: remote-controlled ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in a patient with agenesis of the inferior vena cava. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102(9):687–691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knecht S, Sticherling C, Kühne M. Entering through the back-door: remotely navigated ablation of left atrial tachycardia in the presence of a large atrial septal defect occluder. Europace. 2013;15(7):943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suman-Horduna I, Babu-Narayan SV, Ueda A, et al. Magnetic navigation in adults with atrial isomerism (heterotaxy syndrome) and supraventricular arrhythmias. Europace. 2013;15(6):877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Deisenhofer I, Ammar S, et al. Acute and long-term outcome after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients after the Mustard or Senning operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. Europace. 2013;15(6):886–891.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammar S, Deisenhofer I, Reents T, et al. Remote-controlled magnetic navigation and ablation of atrial flutter in a patient with an extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103(9):753–754.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buiatti A, Hessling G, Semmler V, et al. Remote magnetic navigation for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation via a retrograde aortic access: an approach for patients after atrial septal defect device closure. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103(12):1028–1030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaser AD, Chua K, Broman MT, et al. Electroanatomic Characterization of a “No Access” Hypoplastic Left Ventricle. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(13):1603–1604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bessière F, Mongeon FP, Therrien J, et al. Magnetic-guided catheter ablation of twin AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in a patient with left atrial isomerism, interrupted inferior vena cana, and Kawashima-Fontan procedure. Clin Case Rep. 2017;5(12):2105–2110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux J, Till J, Fraisse A, et al. Recurrent Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in Ebstein anomaly previously treated by transcatheter replacement of tricuspid valve: is catheter ablation of the accessory pathway technically possible? Arch Cardiovasc Dis Suppl. 2017;9(4):285–286.
   Google Scholar
• Cazzoli I, Guarguagli S, Roy K, et al. Arrhythmia substrates in patients after Total Cavo-Pulmonary Connection (TCPC): a single centre experience using remote magnetic navigation. EP Europace. 2018;20(suppl_1):i27–i.
   Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Jacobsen PK, Pehrson S, et al. Catheter ablation of incisional atrial tachycardia using remote magnetic navigation in patients after heart surgery: comparison between acquired and congenital heart disease. Europace. 2018;20(suppl_2):ii33–ii9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guarguagli S, Cazzoli I, Dimopoulos K, et al. Efficacy of remote controlled catheter ablation for atrial arrhythmias in patients with atrial switch. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(Supplement_1):1370.
   Google Scholar
• Meloche C, Kassier A, Veerasamy M, et al. Mapping out the potentials: ventricular tachycardia storm in the young with congenitally corrected transposition. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(9_Supplement_1):2343.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Ojeda J, Hoyt W, Patel M, et al. Transseptal access and pulmonary vein isolation via internal jugular veins for persistent atrial fibrillation treatment in a patient with left atrial isomerism, sinus node dysfunction, and interrupted inferior vena cava: the usefulness of robotic magnetic navigation. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020;6(4):210–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beloborodov VV, Elemesov NA, Ponomarenko A, et al. Remote magnetic navigation for heart rhythm disturbances treatment in patients after surgical correction of congenital heart disease. Patol. Krovoobrashcheniya Kardiokhirurgiya. 2021;25:32
   Google Scholar
• Ernst S, Samchkuashvili N, Kadiwar S, et al. Peripheral vascular access for catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia using remote magnetic navigation. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021;7(6):351–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guarguagli S, Nagarajan VD, Marinelli A, et al. Transseptal puncture via a superior access as an alternative to the conventional femoral route. Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2021;4:100187
   Google Scholar
• Paja CS, Deaconu S, Gondos V, et al. Multiple accessory pathways ablation using remote magnetic navigation in a patient with single ventricle and complex corrective surgeries. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19(5):S270–S1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koa-Wing M, Linton NW, Kojodjojo P, et al. Robotic catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in a patient with congenital heart disease and Rastelli repair. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(10):1163–1166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bessière F, Mondésert B, Chaix MA, et al. Arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure. Heart Rhythm O2. 2021;2(6Part B):744–753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waldmann V, Guichard J-B, Marijon E, et al. Tachyarrhythmias in congenital heart diseases: from ion channels to catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9(2):39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ernst S, Ouyang F, Linder C, et al. Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system: magnetic remote catheter ablation. Circulation. 2004;109(12):1472–1475.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(7):1390–1400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghadban R, Gifft K, Luebbering Z, et al. Radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation with irrigated tip catheter using remote magnetic navigation compared with conventional manual method. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;62(1):95–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton AS, Jordaens LJ. Remote magnetic navigation for mapping and ablating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3(6):691–696.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton AS, Res J, Mekel JM, et al. Use of advanced mapping and remote magnetic navigation to ablate left ventricular fascicular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29(6):685–688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton AS, Maximo Rivero-Ayerza M, Jordaens LJ. Magnetic assisted navigation in electrophysiology and cardiac resynchronisation: a review. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006;6(4):202–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy K, Gomez-Pulido F, Ernst S. Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation in patients with congenital heart disease: a Review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(Suppl 1):S45–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueda A, Suman-Horduna I, Mantziari L, et al. Contemporary outcomes of supraventricular tachycardia ablation in congenital heart disease: a single-center experience in 116 patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(3):606–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasawa J, Miyazaki S, Takagi T, et al. Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during left-sided catheter ablation with the use of different approaches- the potential microembolic risk of a transseptal approach. Europace. 2018;20(2):347–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng J, Wang M, Tang QF, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using robotic magnetic navigation reduces the incidence of silent cerebral embolism. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:777355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christoph M, Poitz D, Pfluecke C, et al. Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;64(2):359–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwagten B, Jordaens L, Witsenburg M, et al. Initial experience with catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation in adults with complex congenital heart disease and in small children. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S198–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pluta S, Lenarczyk R, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, et al. Transseptal versus transaortic approach for radiofrequency ablation in patients with cardioverter-defibrillator and electrical storm. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010;28(1):45–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2016;133(14):e506–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran A, Barry MA, Al Raisi SI, et al. Magnetic guidance versus manual control: comparison of radiofrequency lesion dimensions and evaluation of the effect of heart wall motion in a myocardial phantom. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;44(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bessière F, Zikry C, Rivard L, et al. Contact force with magnetic-guided catheter ablation. Europace. 2018;20(suppl_2):ii1–ii4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Bruck JH, Sultan A, Lüker J, et al. Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108(3):298–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campolo J, Annoni G, Giaccardi M, et al. Congenital heart disease and the risk of cancer: an update on the genetic etiology, radiation exposure damage, and future research strategies. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9:8.
   Google Scholar
• Turagam MK, Atkins D, Tung R, et al. A meta-analysis of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49(3):227–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benali K, Hammache N, Sellal JM, et al. Catheter knot around the mitral valve apparatus: an exceptional complication of remote magnetic navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33(1):137–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lüthje L, Vollmann D, Seegers J, et al. Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation. Europace. 2010;12(11):1574–1580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilek C, Tzeis S, Reents T, et al. Safety of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators in the magnetic field of a novel remote magnetic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(10):1136–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairy P, Balaji S, Srivatsa U, et al. Rationale and design of the ROBOtic Transcatheter ablation In Congenital heart disease (ROBOTIC) registry: from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD). J Atr Fibrillation Electrophysiol. In Press. 2022;15(5):72–78.
   Google Scholar