83
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Studying University as Social Systems Using the Viable System Model: mApp and Semantic Web Technologies at the Industrial University of SantanderFootnote

, &

References

  • Abrahams, B., Condliffe, P. & Zeleznikow, J. 2011. Using an OWL Ontology to Support Legal Negotiation about Owners Corporation Disputes. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: ACM, pp. 194–8.
  • Beer, S. 1979. The Heart of Enterprise. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Beer, S. 1984. The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(1): 7–25. doi: 10.1057/jors.1984.2
  • Beer, S. 1985. Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Beer, S. 1990. Recursion Zero: Meta-Management. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 3(3): 315–26.
  • Caputo, F., Evangelista, F. & Russo, G. 2016a. Information Sharing and Communication Strategies: A Stakeholder Engagement View. In: D. Vrontis, Y. Weber & E. Tsoukatos (Eds.), Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems. Cyprus: EuroMed press, pp.436–42.
  • Caputo, F., Formisano, V., Buronova, B. & Walletzky, L. 2016b. Beyond the Digital Ecosystems View: Insights from Smart Communities. In: D. Vrontis, Y. Weber & E. Tsoukatos (Eds.), Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems. Cyprus: EuroMed press, pp.443–54.
  • Checkland, P. 2000. Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1999.
  • Checkland, P. & Poulter, J. 2010. Soft Systems Methodology. London: Springer.
  • Chin, K.S., Pun, K.F. & Lau, H. 2003. Development of a Knowledge-Based Self-Assessment System for Measuring Organisational Performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 24(4): 443–55. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00192-6
  • Conrad, C. & Wilson, R. 1985. Academic Program Reviews: Institutional Approaches, Expectations, and Controversies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED264806.pdf.
  • Cwarel Isaf Institute. 2002. Ten Pints of Beer. The Rationale of his Cibernetic Books. Cwarel Isaf Institute, ASHE, Washington University: www.managementkybernetik.com.
  • Del Giudice, M., Caputo, F. & Evangelista, F. 2016. How Are Decision Systems Changing? The Contribution of Social Media to the Management of Decisional Liquefaction. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(3): 214–26. doi: 10.1080/12460125.2016.1187546
  • Derrida, J. 1997. Las pupilas de la Universidad. El principio de razón y la idea de la Universidad. Consultado: 16 de mayo de 2013. Recuperado desde: http://www.jacquesderrida.com.ar/textos/Universidad.htm.
  • Di Fatta, D., Caputo, F., Evangelista, F. & Dominici, G. 2016a. Small World Theory and the World Wide Web: Linking Small World Properties and Website Centrality. International Journal of Markets and Business Systems, 2(2): 126–40. doi: 10.1504/IJMABS.2016.080237
  • Di Fatta, D., Musotto, R., D'Aleo, V., Vesperi, W., Morabito, G. & Lo Bue, S. 2016b. “Social Media Data Extraction and Content Analysis.” Chapter 3. In Weak Ties and Value of a Network in the New Internet Economy. Kansas: IGI Global.
  • Di Nauta, P., Merola, B., Caputo, F. & Evangelista, F. 2016. Reflections on the Role of University to Face the Challenges of Knowledge Society for the Local Economic Development. Journal of Knowledge Economy: 1–19.
  • Fang, W. 2007. Using Google Analytics for Improving Library Website Content and Design: A Case Study. Rutgers Universities Libraries. Published online: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3MK6B6N.
  • Fink, G. & Yolles, M. 2015. Collective Emotion Regulation in an Organisation — A Plural Agency with Cognition and Affect. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(5): 832–71. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2014-0179
  • Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. & Sakakibara, S. 1994. A Framework for Quality Management Research and an Associated Measurement Instrument. Journal of Operations management, 11(4): 339–66. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8
  • Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 253–67. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(4), 441–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
  • Gómez, L & Olave, Y. 2002. INDISIO: Instrumento de Indagación sobre los Sistemas de Información en las Organizaciones. Revistas UIS, Vol. I N° 2. Ver en: http://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/2512.
  • Heidegger, M. 2005. La idea de la filosofía y el problema de la concepción del mundo. España: Herder Editorial.
  • Heron, J. 1989. The Facilitator Handbook. New York: Nichols Publishing.
  • Hirschheim, R. & Klein, H.K. 1989. Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. New York: ACM.
  • Hirschheim, R. & Klein, H.K. 1994. Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS. MIS Quaterly, 18(1): 83–109. doi: 10.2307/249611
  • Holling, C.S. 2001. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems, 4(5): 390–405. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
  • Leonard, A. 2000. The Viable System Model and Knowledge Management. Kybernetes, 29(6): 710–5. doi: 10.1108/03684920010333143
  • Luhmann, N. 1991. Sistemas Sociales. Lineamientos para una Teoría General. Madrid: Alianza. Vol. 15, editorial.
  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University Press.
  • Luhmann, N. 1998. Observations on modernity. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California.
  • March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  • Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. 1987. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston, USA: New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.
  • Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. 1991. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Vol. 42). Boston, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E., Davenport, T.H., Patil, D.J. & Barton, D. 2012. Big Data. The Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10): 61–67.
  • Mumford, E. 1983. Designing Human Systems for New Technology — The ETHICS Method. Consultado: 11 de septiembre de 2013. Recuperado desde: http://www.enid.u-net.com/C1book1.htm.
  • Mumford, E. 1985. Sociotechnical systems design: Evolving theory and practice. Manchester Business School, UK.
  • Parsons, T. 2014. The School Class as a Social System. Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education: A Sociological Approach to Education, chapter 3: 35–39.
  • Pérez, J. 2012. Design and Diagnosis for Sustainable Organizations. The Viable System Method. Springer.
  • Plaza, B. 2011. Google Analytics for Measuring Website Performance. Tourism Management, 32(3): 477–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.015
  • Ropohl, G. 1999. Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 4(3): 186–194.
  • Runge Peña, A. K. & Muñoz Gaviria, D. A. 2005. El evolucionismo social, los problemas de la raza y la educación en Colombia, primera mitad del siglo XX: el cuerpo en las estrategias eugenésicas de línea dura y de línea blanda.
  • Schwarz, E. 1997. Toward a Holistic Cybernetics: From Science Through Epistemology to Being. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 4(1): 17–50.
  • Simon, H. 2006. Las ciencias de lo artificial. Granada: Editorial Comares.
  • Toledo, C. 2016. Modelo de Autoevaluación para Programas de Posgrado. Trabajo de Investigación Maestría Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática. Universidad Industrial de Santander. Source: http://tangara.uis.edu.co/biblioweb/tesis/2016/165079.pdf.
  • Varela, F.G., Maturana, H.R. & Uribe, R. 1991. Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, Its Characterization and a Model. In: Facets of Systems Science. Boston, USA: Springer, pp.559–69.
  • Vargas, G. 2006. Tratado de Epistemología. Colombia: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Editorial San Pablo.
  • Vasco, C. 2013. Tensiones y conflictos en la Universidad: calidad y evaluación. Cátedra en el marco de la Cátedra Doctoral Educación & Pedagogía: Pensar la Universidad de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional y la Universidad Industrial de Santander.
  • Vidgen, R. 1998. Cybernetics and Business Processes: Using the Viable System Model to Develop an Enterprise Process Architecture. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(2): 118–31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199806)5:2<118::AID-KPM19>3.0.CO;2-3
  • Von Foerster, H. 2001. Las semillas de la cibernética. Obras escogidas. Edición de Marcelo Pakman. Editorial GEDISA.
  • Yolles, M. 2000. Organisations, Complexity, and Viable Knowledge Management. Kybernetes, 29(9/10): 1202–22. doi: 10.1108/03684920010346257
  • Yolles, M. 2004. Implications for Beer's Ontological System/Metasystem Dichotomy. Kybernetes, 33(3/4): 726–64. doi: 10.1108/03684920410523670
  • Yolles, M. & Di Fatta, D. 2017. Antecedents of Cultural Agency Theory: In the Footsteps of Schwarzian Living Sistem. Kybernetes, 46(2): 210–222. doi: 10.1108/K-11-2016-0316
  • Yolles, M. & Fink, G. 2015a. A General Theory of Generic Modelling and Paradigm Shifts: Part 1 — the Fundamentals. Kybernetes, 44(2): 283–98. doi: 10.1108/K-11-2014-0255
  • Yolles, M. & Fink, G. 2015b. A General Theory of Generic Modelling and Paradigm Shifts: Part 2 — Cybernetic Orders. Kybernetes, 44(2): 299–310. doi: 10.1108/K-12-2014-0302
  • Yolles, M. & Fink, G. 2015c. A General Theory of Generic Modelling and Paradigm Shifts: Part 3 — the Extension. Kybernetes, 44(2): 311–28. doi: 10.1108/K-12-2014-0303

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.