1,095
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Truth and Disclosure in Qualitative Research: Implications of Hermeneutic Realism

References

  • Bal, M 2005, Narrative theory: critical concepts in literary and cultural studies, Routledge, London.
  • Boghossian, P 2006, Fear of knowledge: against relativism and constructivism, Clarendon Press, New York.
  • Bransford, JD, Brown, AL & Cocking, RR 1999, How people learn, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
  • Brock, S & Mares, E 2007, Realism and antirealism, Acumen Publishing, Durham, UK.
  • Camic, P, Rhodes, J & Yardley, L 2003, Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Clandinin, DJ & Connelly, FM 2000, Narrative inquiry, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Costall, A & Still, A (eds.) 1991, Cognitive psychology in question, Harvester, Brighton, UK.
  • Cresswell, JW 2013, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Danziger, K 1985, ‘The methodological imperative in psychology’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 1–13.
  • Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS 2005, The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Dreyfus, HL 1991a, ‘Heidegger’s hermeneutic realism’, in DR Hiley, JF Bohman & R Shusterman (eds.), The interpretive turn: philosophy, science, culture, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 25–41.
  • Dreyfus, HL, 1991b, Being-in-the-world: a commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Dreyfus, HL 1992, What computers still can’t do: a critique of artificial reason, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Dreyfus, HL 2002, ‘Intelligence without representation: Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 367–83.
  • Engeström, Y & Engeström, R 1986, ‘Developmental work research: the approach and an application in cleaning work’, Nordisk Pedagogik, vol. 6, pp. 2–15.
  • Faulconer, JE & Williams, RN 1985, ‘Temporality in human action: an alternative to positivism and historicism’, American Psychologist, vol. 40, pp. 1179–88.
  • Frede, D 2006, ‘The question of being: Heidegger’s project’, in C Guignon (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 42–69.
  • Gadamer, HG 1989, Truth and method, 2nd rev edn, Continuum, New York.
  • Gelven, M 1989, A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, rev edn, Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, IL.
  • Guba, E 1990, Paradigm dialog, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Guba, E & Lincoln, Y 2008, ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), The landscape of qualitative research, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 255–86.
  • Guignon, C 1989, ‘Truth as disclosure: art, language, history’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 28, supplement, pp. 105–20.
  • Guignon, C 2002, ‘Ontological presuppositions of the determinism-free will debate’, in H Atmanspacher & R Bishop (eds.), Between chance and choice: interdisciplinary perspectives on determinism, Imprint Academic, Charlottesville, VA, pp. 321–37.
  • Halling, S 2008, Intimacy, transcendence, and psychology: closeness and openness in everyday life, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Heidegger, M 1962, Being and time, Harper & Row, New York.
  • Holstein, JA & Gubrium, JF 2012, Varieties of narrative analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hook, S 1996, The metaphysics of pragmatism, Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY.
  • Hutchins, E 1995, Cognition in the wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Kane, R 2005, A contemporary introduction to free will, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Kirshner, D & Whitson, JA 1997, Situated cognition: social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Kopala, M & Suzuki, LA 1999, Using qualitative methods in psychology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Kvale, S & Brinkmann, S 2009, Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Lather, P 1993, ‘Fertile obsessions: validity after poststructuralism’, Sociological Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 673–93.
  • Lave, J 1988, Cognition in practice, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Lave, J & Wenger, E 1991, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Leary, D (ed.) 1990, Metaphors in the history of psychology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Lincoln, YS & Guba, EG 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Maxwell, JA 2012, A realist approach for qualitative inquiry, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M 1962, Phenomenology of perception, Routledge, New York.
  • Mishler, EG 1986, Research interviewing: context and narrative, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Moser, PK 1990, Reality in focus: contemporary readings in metaphysics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Neisser, U 1982, Memory observed, Freeman, San Francisco.
  • Nemirovsky, R 2011, ‘Episodic feelings and transfer of learning’, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 308–37.
  • Packer, MJ 1985, ‘Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct’, American Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1081–93.
  • Polkinghorne, DE 1988, Narrative knowing and the human sciences, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
  • Potter, J & Hepburn, A 2005, ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 281–307.
  • Ricoeur, P 1981, ‘The model of the text: meaningful action considered as text’, in JB Thompson (ed.), Paul Ricoeur: hermeneutics and the human sciences, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 197–221.
  • Ricoeur, P 1984, Time and narrative, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Rychlak, JF 1991, Artificial intelligence and human reason: a teleological critique, Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Sfard, A 1998, ‘On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one’, Educational Researcher, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 4–13.
  • Slife, BD 1993, Time and psychological explanation, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
  • Slife, BD 2004, ‘Taking practice seriously: toward a relational ontology’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, vol. 24, pp. 157–78.
  • Slife, BD & Williams, RN 1995, What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Spackman, JS & Yanchar, SC 2014, ‘Embodied cognition, representationalism, and mechanism: a review and analysis’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 46–79.
  • Stake, RE 1995, The art of case study research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Stam, HJ 2006, ‘Pythagoreanism, meaning, and the appeal to number’, New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 240–51.
  • Stigliano, A 1989, ‘Hermeneutical practice’, Saybrook Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 47–67.
  • Taylor, C 1985, Human agency and language: philosophical papers, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Watkins, MJ 1990, ‘Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory’, American Psychologist, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 328–35.
  • Wertz, FJ 2005, ‘Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 167–77.
  • Westerman, MA 2006, ‘Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: the mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive, quantitative investigations’, New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 24, pp. 189–211.
  • Wrathall, MA 2011, Heidegger and unconcealment: truth, language, and history, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Wrathall, MA 2013, ‘Heidegger on human understanding’, in M Wrathall (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 177–200.
  • Yanchar, SC 2011, ‘Participational agency’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 277–87.
  • Yuille, JC 1986, ‘The futility of a purely experimental psychology of cognition: imagery as a case study’, in D Marks (ed.), Theories of image formation, Brandon House, New York, pp. 197–224.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.