An exploration of the possibility for secondary traumatic stress among transcriptionists: a grounded theory approach

References

• Bloor, M, Fincham, B & Sampson, H 2007, QUALITI (NCRM) commissioned inquiry into the risk and well-being of researchers in qualitative research, ESRC, Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• Bowtell, E, Sawyer, S, Aroni, R, Green, J & Duncan, R 2013, ‘“Should I send a condolence card?” Promoting emotional safety in qualitative health research through reflexivity and ethical mindfulness’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 652–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burck, C 2005, ‘Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: the use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis’, Journal of Family Therapy, vol. 27, pp. 237–62.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V 2003, Social constructionism, 2nd edn, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, C 2014, Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K 2005, ‘Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies’, in N Denzin & Y Lincoln (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn, Sage, London, pp. 507–35.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, J & Mudlay, N 2010, ‘Staying safe: strategies for qualitative child abuse researchers’, Child Abuse Review, vol. 19, pp. 56–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J, Astbury, J, Dartnall, E & Limjerwala, S 2014, A qualitative exploration of researcher trauma and researchers’ responses to investigating sexual violence’, Violence Against Women, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 95–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, J, Vermilyea, E, Wilkerson, J & Giller, E 2006, Risking connection in faith communities: a training curriculum for faith leaders supporting trauma survivors, Sidran Institute Press, Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Devilly, GJ, Wright, R and Varker, T 2009, ‘Vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress or simply burnout? Effect of trauma therapy on mental health professionals’, Australasian Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 373–385.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V, James, E, Kippen, S & Liamputtong, P 2008, ‘Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: issues and strategies’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 133–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V, James, E, Kippen, S & Liamputtong, P 2009, ‘Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work’, Qualitative Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensign, J 2003, ‘Ethical issues in qualitative health research with homeless youths’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, K 2007, ‘Working with traumatic stories: from transcriber to witness’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Fincham, B, Scourfield, J & Langer, S 2008, ‘The impact of working with disturbing secondary data: reading suicide files in a coroner’s office’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 853–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J, Johnston, M, Robertson, C, Glidewell, L, Entwistle, V, Eccles, M & Grimshaw, J 2010, ‘What is adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies’, Psychology and Health, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1229–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, D, Russell, C & Phillips, L 1997, ‘Beyond textual perfection: transcribers as vulnerable persons’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M 2001, ‘The hazards of empathy: vicarious trauma of interpreters for the deaf’, Journal of Interpretation, vol. 11, pp. 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A 1983, The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling, with a new afterword, University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G, Backett-Milburn, K & Kemmer, D 2001, ‘Working with emotion: issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S, Backett-Milburn, K & Newall, E 2013, ‘Researching distressing topics: emotional reflexivity and emotional labor in the secondary analysis of children and young people’s narratives of abuse’, SAGE Open, vol. 3, no. 2, doi:10.1177/2158244013490705
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, F, Hicks, B & Yarker, J 2014, ‘Work stress and cancer researchers: an exploration of the challenges, experiences and training needs of UK cancer researchers’, European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 462–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyimba, N & O’Reilly, M in press, ‘The risk of secondary traumatic stress in the qualitative transcription process: A research note’, Qualitative Research, doi:10.1177/1468794115577013
   Google Scholar
• Lalor, J, Begley, C & Devane, D 2006, ‘Exploring painful experiences: impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 607–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J & Lindsay, A 1999, ‘Transcription in research and practice: from standardization of technique to interpretive positioning’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 64–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Treweek, G & Linkogle, S 2000, ‘Putting danger in the frame’, in G Lee-Treweek & S Linkogle (Eds)., Danger in the field: risk and ethics in social research, Routledge, London, pp. 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Malacrida, C 2007, ‘Reflexive journaling on emotional research topics: ethical issues for team researchers’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1329–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, IL & Pearlman, L 1990, ‘Vicarious traumatization: a framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims’, Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 131–49.
   Google Scholar
• McCosker, H, Barnard, A & Gerber, R 2001, ‘Undertaking sensitive research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 2, no. 1, viewed 12 May 2015, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/983/2143.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, M & Morse, JM 2009, ‘Institutional review boards and the ethics of emotion’, in NK Denzin & MD Gardina (eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 81–107.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M & Kiyimba, N 2015, Advanced qualitative research: a guide to contemporary theoretical debates. Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M & Parker, N 2013, ‘“Unsatisfactory Saturation”: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research’, Qualitative Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 190–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, N & O’Reilly, M 2013, ‘“We are alone in the house”: a case study addressing researcher safety and risk’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowarczyk, L, Ignatius, S, Crosby, S, Grodin, M, Heeren, T & Sharma, A 2009, ‘Secondary trauma in asylum lawyers’, Bender’s Immigration Bulletin, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 263–69.
   Google Scholar
• Pryce, J, Shackelford, K & Price, D 2007, Secondary traumatic stress and the child welfare professional, Lyceum Books, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, H, Bloor, M & Fincham, B 2008, ‘A price worth paying? Considering the “cost” of reflexive research methods and the influence of feminist ways of “doing”’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 919–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, E 2013, ‘The vulnerable researcher: facing the challenges of sensitive research’, Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 278–88.
   Google Scholar
• Social Research Association 2010, A code of practice for the safety of social researchers, viewed 18 October 2010, http://www.the-sra.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A & Corbin, J 1990, Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, S & Powick, K 2002, ‘Distanced data: transcribing other people’s research tapes’, Canadian Journal of Education, vol. 27, no. 2&3, pp. 291–310.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, D 2004, ‘Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 578–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes, L, Cummings, J & Haigh, C 2014, ‘Transcriptionist saturation: knowing too much about sensitive health and social data’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, doi:10.111/jan.12510
   Google Scholar