Humanism after posthumanism: or qualitative psychology after the “posts”

References

• Aghasaleh, R & St. Pierre, EA 2014, A reader’s guide to post-qualitative inquiry proposals, viewed 11 November 2016, <http://goo.gl/3OC5b2>.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K 2007, Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z 2000, Liquid modernity, Polity, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L & Chiapello, E 2005, The new spirit of capitalism, Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S 2008, ‘Changing psychologies in the transition from industrial society to consumer society’, History of the Human Sciences (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S 2013, John Dewey: science for a changing world, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S, Jacobsen, MH & Kristiansen, S 2014, ‘Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences’, in P Leavy (ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S & Kvale, S 2015, InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A 2004, ‘From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: the principle of animal-environment mutuality’, Behavior and Philosophy, vol. 32, pp. 179–95.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G & Guattari, F 1987, A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS 2011, ‘Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J 1970, Of grammatology, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J 1925, Experience and nature, Open Court, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J 1929, The quest for certainty, this edn 1960, Capricorn Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J & Bentley, A 1949, Knowing and the known, this edn 1960, Beacon Press, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M 1988, ‘Technologies of the self’, in Technologies of the self, Tavistock Publications, London, pp. 16–49.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J 1999, ‘John Dewey’s theory of practical reasoning’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 31, pp. 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G 2007, Analyzing qualitative data, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A & Giorgi, B 2008, ‘Phenomenological psychology’, in C Willig & W Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, Sage, London, pp. 165–78.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D 1991, Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R 2004, ‘Staking our claim for qualitative psychology as science’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M & Honneth, A 2006, ‘Paradoxes of capitalism’, Constellations, vol. 13, pp. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M 1927, Being and time, this edn 1962, HarperCollins Publishers, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D 1978, A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects, Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Original work published 1739)
   Google Scholar
• James, W 1981, Pragmatism, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN. (Original work published 1907)
   Google Scholar
• Karpatschof, B 2010, ‘Den kvalitative undersøgelsesforms særlige kvaliteter [The particular qualities of qualitative inquiry]’, in S Brinkmann & L Tanggaard (eds.), Kvalitative metoder [Qualitative methods], Hans Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen, pp. 409–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, G & Wickham, G 1999, Using Foucault’s methods, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S 1992, ‘Postmodern psychology: a contradiction in terms?’, in S Kvale (ed.), Psychology and postmodernism, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P 2016, ‘Top ten+ lists: (re) thinking ontology in (post)qualitative research’, Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, vol. 16, pp. 125–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P & St. Pierre, EA 2013, ‘Post-qualitative research’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 26, pp. 629–33.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B 1993, We have never been modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B 2005, Reassembling the social, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M 2013, ‘Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research’, in R Coleman & J Ringrose (eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies, Edingburgh University Press, Edingburgh, pp. 164–83.
   Google Scholar
• Marecek, J 2003, ‘Dancing through minefields: toward a qualitative stance in psychology’, in PM Camic, JE Rhodes & L Yardley (eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design, American Psychological Association Press, Washington, DC, pp. 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K & Engels, F 1848, Manifesto of the Communist Party, viewed 11 November 2016, <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, JA 2012, A realist approach for qualitative research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Michell, J 2003, ‘The quantitative imperative: positivism, naïve realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, K 2011, ‘Critical humanism and queer theory’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Hepburn, A 2005, ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L & St. Pierre, EA 2005, ‘Writing: a method of inquiry’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 959–78.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, DN 2002, Praise and blame: moral realism and its applications, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R 1980, Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R 1989, Contingency, irony, and solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W 1997, Empiricism and the philosophy of mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (Original work published 1956)
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, EA 2008, ‘Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry’, International Review of Qualitative Research, vol. 1, pp. 319–36.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, EA 2011, ‘Post qualitative inquiry’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 611–25.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, EA, Jackson, AY & Mazzei, L 2016, ‘New empiricisms and new materialisms: conditions for new inquiry’, Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, vol. 16, pp. 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C 1989, Sources of the self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C 1995, ‘Cross-purposes: the liberal-communitarian debate’, in Philosophical arguments, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 181–203.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, L & Fine, M 2004, Working method: research and social justice, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F 2014, ‘Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology’, Qualitative Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H 2009, Writing up qualitative research, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S 2012, Organs without bodies, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar