869
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Graduate education in qualitative methods in U.S. psychology: current trends and recommendations for the future

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Aiken, LS, West, SG, Sechrest, L, Reno, RR, Roediger, HL, Scarr, S & Sherman, SJ 1990, ‘Graduate training in statistics, methodology, and a survey of PhD programs in North America’, American Psychologist, vol. 45, pp. 721–34, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.6.721.
  • Aiken, LS, West, SG & Millsap, RE 2008, ‘Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno’s (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America’, American Psychologist, vol. 63, p. 32, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.32.
  • American Psychological Association (APA) 2015, Commission on accreditation: implementing regulations, viewed 25 June 2017, https://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/about/policies/implementing-guidelines.pdf
  • Bhati, KS, Hoyt, WT & Huffman, KL 2014, ‘Integration or assimilation? Locating qualitative research in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 98–114,doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.772684.
  • Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 77–101, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Brinkmann, S 2015, ‘Perils and potentials in qualitative psychology’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 49, no2, pp. 162–173.
  • Clarke, V & Braun, V 2013, ‘Teaching thematic analysis: overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning’, The Psychologist, vol. 26, pp. 120–3.
  • Eagly, AH & Riger, S 2014, ‘Feminism and psychology: critiques of methods and epistemology’, American Psychologist, vol. 69, pp. 685–702, doi:10.1037/a0037372.
  • Fine, M 1985, ‘Reflections on a feminist psychology of women: paradoxes and prospects’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167–83.
  • Fine, M 2016, ‘Just methods in revolting times’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 347–65, doi:10.1080/14780887.2016.1219800.
  • Gergen, KJ 2001, ‘Psychological science in a postmodern context’, American Psychologist, vol. 56, pp. 803–13, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.803.
  • Gergen, KJ, Josselson, R, Freeman, M & Anderson, NB 2015, ‘The promises of qualitative inquiry’, American Psychologist, vol. 70, pp. 1–9, doi:10.1037/a0038597.
  • Harper, DJ 2012, ‘Surveying qualitative research teaching on British clinical psychology training programs 1992–2006: a changing relationship?’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 5–12, doi:10.1080/14780887.2012.630626.
  • Hays, DG, Wood, C, Dahl, H & Kirk‐Jenkins, A 2016, ‘Methodological rigor in journal of counseling & development qualitative research articles: a 15‐year review’, Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 94, pp. 172–83, doi:10.1002/jcad.12074.
  • Keeley, SM, Shemberg, KM & Zaynor, L 1988, ‘Dissertation research in clinical psychology: beyond positivism? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, vol. 19, pp. 216–22, doi:10.1037/0735-7028.19.2.216.
  • Lamont, M & White, P 2010, Report from workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
  • Levitt, HM, Motulsky, SL, Wertz, FJ, Morrow, SL & Ponterotto, JG 2017, ‘Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: promoting methodological integrity’, Qualitative Psychology, vol. 4, pp. 2–22, doi:10.1037/qup0000082.
  • Levitt, HM, Bamberg, M, Creswell, DM, Josselson, R & Suárez-Orozco, C in press, ‘Journal article reporting standards for qualitative research in psychology: the APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist.
  • Marecek, J 2003, ‘Dancing through minefields: toward a qualitative stance in psychology’, in PM Camic, JE Rhodes & L Yardley (eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 49–69.
  • Mitchell, T, Friesen, M, Friesen, D & Rose, R 2007, ‘Learning against the grain: reflections on the challenges and revelations of studying qualitative research methods in an undergraduate psychology course’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 4, pp. 227–40, doi:10.1080/14780880701473441.
  • Morawski, J 2001, ‘Feminist research methods: bringing culture to science’, in DL Tolman & M Braydon-Miller (eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: a handbook of interpretive and participatory methods, New York University Press, New York, pp. 57–75.
  • Morawski, J 2011, ‘Our debates: finding, fixing, and enacting reality’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 260–74, doi:10.1177/0959354310394475.
  • Ponterotto, JG 2005, ‘Qualitative research training in counseling psychology: a survey of directors of training’, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 60–2, doi:10.1191/1478088705qp035oa.
  • Povee, K & Roberts, LD 2014, ‘Qualitative research in psychology: attitudes of psychology students and academic staff’, Australian Journal of Psychology, vol. 66, pp. 28–37, doi:10.1111/ajpy.12031.
  • Roberts, LD & Castell, E 2016, ‘“Having to shift everything we’ve learned to the side”: expanding research methods taught in psychology to incorporate qualitative methods’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 1–8, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00688.
  • SQIP Executive Committee Comment n.d., viewed 29 June 2017, http://apps.apa.org/accredcomment/FullComment.aspx?commentID=2499.
  • Weisstein, N 1968, Kinder, kuche, kirche as scientific law: psychology constructs the female, New England Free Press, Boston.
  • Yakushko, O, Hoffman, L, Morgan Consoli, ML & Lee, G 2016, ‘On methods, methodologies, and continued colonization of knowledge in the study of “ethnic minorities”: comment on Hall et al. (2016)’, American Psychologist, vol. 71, pp. 890–1, doi:10.1037/amp0000060.
  • Yakushko, O & Hook, D 2017, ‘Whatever happened to the human experience in undergraduate psychology? Comment on the special issue on undergraduate education in psychology’, American Psychologist, vol. 72, pp. 173–5, doi:10.1037/amp0000055.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.