Feminist Relational Discourse Analysis: putting the personal in the political in feminist research

References

• Ahmed, S 2017, Living a feminist life, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Arribas-Ayllon, M & Walkerdine, V 2008, ‘Foucauldian discourse analysis’, in C Willig & W Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, Sage, London, pp. 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood, F 2013, ‘Through the looking glass? Sexual agency and subjectification online’, in R Gill & C Scharff (eds.), New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 203–14.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, MJ 2015, ‘Nonbinary feminism: the personal is still political. [Blog]. Rewriting the Rules. viewed 15 April 2016, https://rewriting-the-rules.com/2015/11/13/non-binary-feminism-the-personal-is-still-political/
   Google Scholar
• Boonzaier, F 2014, ‘Talking against dominance: South African women resisting dominant discourse in narratives of violence’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 102–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C 2014, ‘Untangling emotional threads of self-management discourse in women’s body talk’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 174–90.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J 1990, Gender trouble, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, ER 2009, ‘Intersectionality and research in psychology’, American Psychologist, vol. 64, pp. 170–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, RK 2014, ‘Bodies talk: on the challenges of hearing childbirth counter-stories’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B & Harre, R 1990, ‘Positioning: The discursive production of selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 20, pp. 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, P & Cassell, C 2004, ‘The position of policewomen: a discourse analytic study’, Work, Employment and Society, vol. 18, pp. 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edley, N & Wetherell, M 2001, ‘Jekyll and Hyde: analysing constructions of the feminist’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 439–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erel, U 2013, ‘Migrant women challenging stereotypical views on femininities and family’, in R Gill & C Scharff (eds.), New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 230–45.
   Google Scholar
• Farvid, P 2014, ‘“Oh it was good sex”: heterosexual women’s (counter)narratives of desire and pleasure in casual sex’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 121–40.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M 1973, ‘Preface’, in S Livrozet, De la prison à la révolte, Mercure de France, Paris, pp. 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M 1977, Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, Allen Lane, London.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M 1988, The history of sexuality: the care of the self (Vol. 3), Vintage, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N 1989, ‘Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: contributions to feminist psychology’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 13, pp. 459–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N 1997, ‘Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis’, in MM Gergen & SN Davis (eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender, Routledge, New York, pp. 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N 2011, ‘Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis revisited’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 35, pp. 183–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, KJ 1985, ‘The social constructionist movement in modern psychology’, American Psychologist, vol. 40, pp. 266–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, KJ & Thatchenkery, TJ 1996, ‘Organizational science as social construction: postmodern potentials’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 32, pp. 356–77.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A & Macleod, C 2014, ‘Beyond “coming out”: lesbians’ (alternative) stories of sexual identity told in post-apartheid South Africa’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R & Scharff, C 2013, ‘Introduction’, in R Gill & C Scharff (eds.), New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C, Spencer, R, Weinberg, MK & Bertsch, T 2006, ‘On the listening guide: a voice-centered relational method’, in SN Hesse-Biber & P Leavy (eds.), Emergent methods in social research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 253–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W 1991, ‘The psychologization of feminism or the feminization of psychology?’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C 2002, Women’s contemporary lives: within and beyond the mirror, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, D 1993, Silencing the self: women and depression, Harper Collins, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lafrance, MN 2014, ‘Depression as oppression: disrupting the biomedical discourse in women’s stories of sadness’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 141–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lafrance, MN & McKenzie-Mohr, S 2014, ‘Women counter-storying their lives’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, MM 2013, ‘The right to be beautiful: postfeminist identity and consumer beauty advertising’, in R Gill & C Scharff (eds.), New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, S 2014, ‘Counter-storying rape: women’s efforts toward liberatory meaning making’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 64–83.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L 1992, Foucault and feminism, Cambridge, Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A 2009, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• McSpadden, E 2011, ‘The participant’s response’, in FJ Wertz, K Charmaz, LM McMullen, R Josselson, R Anderson & E McSpadden (eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 334–52.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, LF 2002, ‘Regulating “unruly” bodies: work tasks, conflict and violence in Britain’s night-time economy’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 53, pp. 403–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I 1992, Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I 2013, ‘Discourse analysis: dimensions of critique in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 10, pp. 223–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J 2003, ‘Discourse analysis and discursive psychology’, in PM Camic, JE Rhodes & L Yardley (eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Wetherell, M 1987, Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Prilleltensky, I & Nelson, G 2009, ‘Community psychology: advancing social justice’, in D Fox, I Prilleltensky & S Austin (eds.), Critical psychology: an introduction, Sage, London, pp. 126–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rickett, B 2014, “‘Girly-girls,” “scantily-clad ladies,” and policewomen: negotiating and resisting femininities in non-traditional work space’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 159–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rickett, B & Roman, A 2013, “‘Heroes & matriarchs”: working-class femininities, violence and door supervision work’, Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 6, pp. 664–77.
   Google Scholar
• Saukko, P 2000, ‘Between voice and discourse: quilting interviews on anorexia’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 6, pp. 299–317.
   Google Scholar
• Saukko, P 2008, The anorexic self: a personal, political analysis of a diagnostic discourse, State University of New York Press, Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Saukko, P 2010, Doing research in cultural studies: an introduction to classical and new methodological approaches, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, JA 1999, ‘Identity development during the transition to motherhood: an interpretative phenomenological analysis’, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 17, pp. 281–99.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J & Stokoe, EH 2005, ‘Discourses of work–life balance: negotiating “genderblind” terms in organizations’, Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 12, pp. 147–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton-Rogers, W 2003, Social psychology: experimental and critical approaches, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton-Rogers, W 2011, Social psychology: experimental and critical approaches, 2nd edn, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, I 2013, ‘Pregnant beauty: maternal femininities under neoliberalism’, in R Gill & C Scharff (eds.), New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, JM & Perz, J 2014, ‘“I used to think I was going a little crazy”: women’s resistance to the pathologisation of premenstrual change’, in S McKenzie-Mohr & MN Lafrance (eds.), Women voicing resistance: discursive and narrative explorations, Routledge, Hove, pp. 84–101.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T 2001, ‘What is authenticity?’, Discourse Studies, vol. 3, pp. 392–7.
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C 1987, Feminist practice & poststructuralist theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M & Edley, N 1999, ‘Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 335–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S & Potter, J 2008, ‘Discursive psychology’, in C Willig & W Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, Sage, London, pp. 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S 1986, ‘Sighting possibilities: diversity and commonality in feminist research’, in S Wilkinson (ed.), Feminist social psychology: developing theory and practice, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp. 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S 1991, ‘Feminism & psychology: from critique to reconstruction’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willott, S & Griffin, C 1997, ‘“Wham bam, am I a man?”: unemployed men talk about masculinities’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 107–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L 1958, Philosophical investigations, 3rd edn, GEM Anscombe (Trans.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, LA & Kroger, RO 2000, Doing discourse analysis: methods for studying action in talk and text, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Woolhouse, M, Day, K, Rickett, B & Milnes, K 2012, ‘“Cos girls aren’t supposed to eat like pigs are they?” Young women negotiating gendered discursive constructions of food and eating’, Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 17, pp. 46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar