The past and present of triangulation and social representations theory: A crossed history

References

• Apostolidis, T 2006, ‘Représentations sociales et triangulation: une application en psychologie sociale de la santé’, Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, vol. 22, pp. 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R 2001, ‘Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?’, British Medical Journal, vol. 322, pp. 1115–1117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batel, S, Castro, P, Devine-Wright, P, & Howarth, C 2016, ‘Developing a critical agenda to understand pro-environmental actions: contributions from social representations and social practices theories’, WIREs Climate Change, pp. 727–745.
   Google Scholar
• Bouterse, J, & Karstens, B 2015, ‘A Diversity of Divisions: Tracing the History of the Demarcation between the Sciences and the Humanities’, Isis, vol. 106, no. (2), pp. 341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S, Jacobsen, MH, & Kristiansen, S, 2014, ‘Historical Overview of Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences’, in P. Leavy (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, Oxford University Press, New-York, pp. 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S, & Flick, U 2013, ‘New meanings for old habits? Representations of climate change in France and in Germany’, International Review of Social Psychology, vol. 26, pp. 39–72.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S, 2015, ‘Triangulation des méthodes d’analyse du discours en psychologie sociale. Deux exemples d’études sur les représentations sociales de l’écologie’, in C Canut & P Münchow (eds.), Le langage en sciences humaines et sociales, Editions Lambert Lucas, Paris, pp. 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S 2016, ‘Social Representations Theory: A Dialogical Approach to the Ecological crisis, Papers on Social Representations, vol. 25, pp. 3.1–3.30.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S, & Flick, U 2016, ‘Triangulation méthodologique, ou comment penser son plan de recherche’, in G Lo Monaco, S Delouvée & P Rateau (eds.), Les représentations sociales. Théories, méthodes et applications, De Boeck, Louvain-la-Neuve, pp. 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S & Flick, U 2017, ‘Focus groups in triangulation contexts’, in R Barbour & D Morgan (eds.), ‘A new era in focus groups research. Challenges, innovation, and practice,’. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire, pp. 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S & Haas, V 2017, ‘Représentations croisées du rôle des psychologues dans le champ du handicap: les attentes des MDPH et les comptes rendus psychologiques’, Neuropsychiatrie de l‘Enfance et de l‘Adolescence, vol. 65, pp. 350–369.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D & Fiske, D 1959, ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 56, pp. 81–105.
   Google Scholar
• Chombard de Lauwe, M.J 1971, Un Monde autre: l‘enfance. De ses représentations à son mythe, Paris, Payot.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J & Plano Clark, V 2011, ‘Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research’, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Del Rio Carral, M & Santiago-Delefosse, M 2017, ‘Introduction’, in M Del Rio Carral & M Santiago-Delefosse (eds.), Les méthodes qualitatives en psychologie et sciences humaines de la santé, Dunod, Paris, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N 1970/ 1978, The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, ( 1st and 2nd editions), McGraw-Hill, New-York.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N 1989, The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, (3rd editions), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N & Lincoln, Y 2000, ‘Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research’, in N Denzin & Y Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research., 2 nd edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, California, pp. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Doumergue, M 2016, ‘Don, parentés et représentations sociales. Thèse de doctorat’, Université Lumière Lyon2, Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Duveen, G & Lloyd, B 1990, ‘Introduction’, in G Duveen & B Lloyd (eds.), Social representations and the develoment of knowledge, CUP, Cambridge, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, R 1977, ‘Heider, Harré and Herzlich on health and illness: Some observations on the structure of “‘représentations collectives”., European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 7, no. (4), pp. 491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M & Molina-Azorin, J 2017, ‘The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 11, pp. 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, N & Fielding, J 1986, Linking data, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 1991, ‘Triangulation’, in U Flick, E Kardorff, H Keupp, L Rosenstiel & W Stephan (eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen, Beltz Psychologie Verlag, München, pp. 432–434.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 1992a, ‘Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative?’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 22, pp. 175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U—– 1992b, ‘Combining Mmethods - lack of methodology: discussion of Sotirakopoulou & Breakwell’, Ongoing Productions on Social Representations, vol. 1, pp. 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 2001, ‘Interpretive Social Psychology - Qualitative Methods in the Study of Social Representations’, in F Buschini & N Kalampalikis (eds.), Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Mélanges en l‘honneur de Serge Moscovici., Editions de la MSH, Paris, pp. 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 2008, Managing quality in qualitative research, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 2017, ‘Mantras and myths: the disenchantment of mixed-methods research and revisiting triangulation as a perspective’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 23, pp. 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U & Foster, J 2008, ‘Social Rrepresentations’, in C Willig & W Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, Sage, London, pp. 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U, Garms-Homolova, V, Herrmann, W, Kuck, J, & Röhnsch, G 2012, ‘“I can‘t prescribe something just because someone asks for it.”. using mixed methods in the framework of triangulation’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 6, pp. 97–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K, Josselson, RR, & Freeman, M, 2015, ‘The promises of qualitative research’, American Psychologist, vol. 70, pp. 1—9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B & Strauss, A 1965, ‘Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research’, The American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 8, pp. 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E & Lincoln, Y 1994, ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in N Denzin & Y Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qqualitative Rresearch, Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA, pp. 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Herzlich, C 1973, Health and illness: A social psychological analysis, Oxford, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzlich, C 2017, ‘A journey in the field of health: From social psychology to multidisciplinarity’, Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 23, no. (3), pp. 386–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelweit, H., & Gaskell, G. (eds.) 1990, Societal Psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, C 2006, ‘A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory’, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 65–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, K 2011, ‘Mixed methods, mixed causes?’ in N Denzin & D Giardina (eds.), Qualitative inquiry and global crises, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 1985, Civils et Bredins. Rapport à la folie et représentations sociales de la maladie mentale dans un milieu rural français, Thèse de Doctorat d’État, Ehess, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 1989, Folies et représentations sociales, PUF, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 2003, ‘Aperçus sur les méthodologies qualitatives’, in S Moscovici & F Buschini (eds.), Méthodes en sciences humaines PUF, Paris, pp. 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 2007, ‘Préface’, in N Kalampalikis (ed.), Les Grecs et le mythe d’Alexandre. Étude psychosociale d’un conflit symbolique à propos de la Macédoine, L’Harmattan, Paris, pp. 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 2015, Représentations sociales et mondes de vie, Éd. des Archives contemporaines, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H 1995, ‘Social representations of aids: towards encompassing issues of power’, Papers on Social Representations, vol. 4, pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kaës, R 1968, Images de la culture chez les ouvriers français, Cujas, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N 2002, ‘Des noms et des représentations’, Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, vol. 53, pp. 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N 2007, Les Grecs et le mythe d’Alexandre. Étude psychosociale d’un conflit symbolique à propos de la Macédoine, L’Harmattan, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N 2013, ‘Retour au milieu vital’, in S Moscovici, Le scandale de la pensée sociale, Éd. de l’Ehess, Paris, pp. 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N 2019, ‘A lasting symbolic threat: the dispute over the name Macedonia in Greece’, in D Jodelet, J Vala & E Drozda-Senkowska (eds.), Societies under threat: a pluri-disciplinary approach, Springer, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N & Apostolidis, T 2019, ‘Challenges for social representations theory: the socio-genetic perspective’, in S. Papastamou (ed.), New Perspectives in Social Thinking and Social Influence, Montpellier, Éditions de la Méditerranée.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N & Haas, V 2008, ’More than a theory: a new map of social thought’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 38, pp. 449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N, Doumergue, M, & Zadeh, S 2018, ‘Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France’, Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, vol. 5, pp. 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kelle, U 2006, ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, AC, & Gaskell, G, 2015, ‘Social representations and societal psychology’, in G Sammut, E Andreouli, G Gaskell, & J Valsiner (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. & Jodelet, D, 1976, ‘Psychological maps of Paris’, in H.M Proshansky, W.H Ittelson, & L.G Rivlin (eds.), Environmental Psychology: People and their physical settings, Rinehart et Winston, New York, Holt, pp. 88–113.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 1961a, La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Étude sur la représentation sociale de la psychanalyse, PUF, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 1961b, Reconversion industrielle et changements sociaux. Un exemple: la chapellerie dans l’Aude, Armand Colin, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 1973, ‘Foreword’, in C Herzlich, (ed.), Health and Iillness: A social analysis, Academic Press, London, pp. IX–XIV.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 1988, ‘Notes towards a description of social representations’, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 211–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 1998, ‘The history and actuality of social representations’, in U Flick (ed.), The psychology of the social, CUP, Cambridge, pp. 209–247.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 2001, ‘Why a theory of social representations?’, in K Deaux & G Philogène (eds.), Representation of the social, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 8–36.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 2012, Raison et cultures, Éd. de l’Ehess, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 2013, Le scandale de la pensée sociale, Éd. de l’Ehess, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ohayon, A 2006, Psychologie et psychanalyse en France. L’impossible rencontre, La Découverte, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I 2004, ‘Criteria for qualitative research in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Provencher, C 2011, ‘Towards a better understanding of cognitive polyphasia’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 41, pp. 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolli, V, Castro, P, Tuzzi, A, & Contarello, A, 2018, ‘Probing the history of social psychology, exploring diversity and views of the social: Publication trends in the European Journal of Social Psychology from 1971 to 2016’, European Journal of Social Psychology, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, G 2006, ‘Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: qualitative and the idea of qualitative research’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 53, pp. 304–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago-Delefosse, M, Bruchez, C, Gavin, A, Stephen, SL, & Roux, P 2015, ‘Complexity of the paradigms present in quality criteria of qualitative research grids’, Sage Open, vol. 5, pp. 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, R, Pryce, J, & Walsh, J 2014, ‘Philosophical Approaches to Qualitative Research’, in P Leavy (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Rresearch, Oxford University Press, New-York, pp. 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sotirakopoulou, K & Breakwell, G 1992, ‘The use of different methodological approaches in the study of social representations’, Ongoing Productions on Social Representations, vol. 1, pp. 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, M, & Zimmermann, B, 2006, ‘Beyond comparison: Histoire croisée and the challenge of reflexivity‘, History and Theory, vol. 45, 30–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, F, 2014, ‘Qualitative inquiry in the History of Psychology’, Qualitative Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C & Stainton-Rogers, W 2008, ‘Introduction’, in C Willig & W Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, Sage, London, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar