‘No-one listens to us’: Post-truth, affect and Brexit

References

• Alford, C. F. 2014. Voting against one’s interests: The hatred of big government. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 19 (2):203–08.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. 1975. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses, in lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York, Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badmington, N. 2000. Posthumanism (Readers in cultural criticism). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bick, E. 1968. The experience of skin in early object relations. The International Journal of Psycho-analysis 49 (2):484–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2013. Habit and affect: Revitalizing a forgotten history, Body and Society 2 and 3, 186–216.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2014. Affect and automaticy: Towards an analytics of experimentation. Subjectivity 7 (4):362–84. doi:10.1057/sub.2014.19.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L., and V. Walkerdine. 2002. Mass Hysteria: Critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhamer, D., J. Corrigan, and T. Harris, eds. 2015. Deep maps and Spatial narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, W., et al. 2016. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, N. G. 2016. Working in Ghost Labs - developing a collaborative. process/eventspaceofpoliticisedintergenerationalcommunityre-imagination.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P., and J. Halley, eds. 2007. The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke.
   Google Scholar
• Crean, M. 2018. Affective formations of class consciousness: Care consciousness. Sociological Review, online first. January. doi:10.1177/0038026117751341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromby, J. 2015. Feeling bodies: Embodying psychology. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cromby, J., and M. E. H. Willis. 2014. Nudging into subjectification: Governmentality and psychometrics. Critical Social Policy 34 (2):241–59. doi:10.1177/0261018313500868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W. 2018. Nervous states: How feelings took over the world. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Davoine, F., and J. M. Gaudilliere. 2004. History beyond Trauma. San Francisco: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duhan, J. 2013. Vive le proletariat: The 1968 revolt of French workers and students. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=honors_theses.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. 1997. Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., and G. Seigworth, eds. 2010. The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2002. Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Peru, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques, J., W. Hollway, C. Venn, C. Urwin, and V. Walkerdine. 1984. Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O. 2011. Chavs: The demonization of the working class. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, M., and T. Kinnunen. 2016. Touch as an affective practice annual conference of the westermarck society. University of Jyväskylä. March 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kolokili, A. 2018. Free lunch with the stench wench: Towards a synaesthetics of poverty and shame in Catherine Hoffmann’s performance. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitner, R. 2016. Post-truth and its consequences: What a 25-year-old essay tells us about the current moment. The Nation. 1 December
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., M. A. Baum, Y. Benkler, A. J. Berinsky, K. M. Greenhill, F. Menczer, M. J. Metzger, B. Nyhan, G. Pennycook, D. Rothschild, et al. 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359:6380. doi:10.1126/science.aao2998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. 1922. The crowd: A study of the popular mind, London, T. Fisher Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, R. 2011. The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37 (3):434–72. doi:10.1086/659353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2015. The politics of affect. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raynsford, N. 2016. Substance not spin: An insider’s view of success and failure in government. Bristol Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. 2001. The psychology of crowd dynamics. Pp. 39–54, In Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, ed. M. A. Hogg and R. S. Tindale. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and V. Walkerdine. 2008. Regulating the Abject The TV make-over as site of neo-liberal reinvention toward bourgeois femininity. Feminist Media Studies 8 (3):227–46. doi:10.1080/14680770802217279.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and J. M. Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, T. 2012. Contagion theory in the age of networks. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P. 2017. Liminality and experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. London: Plagrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. 2010. Forms of vitality. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert, D., and V. Walkerdine. 2016. Rethinking community research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert, D. H. 2006. Conceptualising community: Beyond the state and the individual. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social abjection and resistence in neoliberal. Britain, London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (in press) Neoliberalism, in Stavrakakis Y (ed) Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalytic Political Theory, London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 1984. Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy, J. Henriques, Hollway W., Urwin C., Venn C and Walkerdine V. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 2010. Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body and Society 16 (1). doi:10.1177/1357034X09354127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 2015. The Making of a Child: Intergenerational Transmission and Development: “Growing Up Girl” Revisited, Keynote Address, Fragile Subjects: Childhood in literature, arts and medicine conferenceTurku, Finland, August, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 2017. Of dinosaurs and divas: Is class still relevant to feminist research? Subjectivity 10 (1):1–12. doi:10.1057/s41286-016-0021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., and J. Jimenez. 2012. Gender, work and community after de-industrialisation: A psychosocial approach to affect. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, V. 2016. Brexit, Blaenau Gwent and EU funds. https://www.bevanfoundation.org/commentary/brexit_blaenau_gwent_eu_funds/.
   Google Scholar