Constituting agency in the delivery of telephone-mediated victim support

References

• Antaki, C & Kent, A 2015, ‘Offering alternatives as a way of issuing directives to children: putting the worse option last’, vol. 78, no. Mar (March 1, 2015): 25–38. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1735640579/
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C & Widdicombe, S 2008, Identities in talk. Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C, Emmison, M & Firth, A 2005, Calling for help: language and social interaction in telephone helplines, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M 1987, Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, SE & Heritage, J 2014, Benefactors and beneficiaries: benefactive statys and stane in the managemnt of offers and requests’, in P Drew & E Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 55–86.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E 2014, ‘What does grammar tell us about action?’, Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (Ipra), vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 623–47. doi:10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, TS & Drew, P 2008, ‘Contingency and action: Acomparison of two forms of requesting’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 129–53. doi:10.1080/08351810802028613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P 1997, ‘“Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 69. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D 1995, ‘Sacks and psychology’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 579–96. doi:10.1177/0959354395054006.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D 2007, ‘Introduction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–7. doi:10.1080/08351810701331190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D & Potter, J 1992, Discursive psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D & Stokoe, E 2007, ‘Self-help in calls for help with problem neighbors’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 9–32. doi:10.1080/08351810701331208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H 1984, Studies in ethnomethodology, Polity, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T 2006, ‘“Will you or can’t you?”: displaying entitlement in interrogative requests’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1081–104. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques, J, Hollway, W, Cathy, U, Couze, V & Walkerdine, V 1984, Changing the subject: psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, Methuen, London.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J 1984, Garfinkel and ethnomethodology, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J 2012, ‘Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E & Stokoe, E 2015, ‘Offers of assistance in politician–constituent interaction’, Discourse Studies, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 724–51. doi:10.1177/1461445615602376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G 2004, “Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation analysis:Studies from the first generation, edited by Gene .H. Lerner, 43–59. Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, KH & Drew, P 2016, ‘Recruitment: offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, T 2013, ‘Dispatching emergency assistance: callers’ claims of entitlement and call takers’ decisions’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 205–30. doi:10.1080/08351813.2013.810401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S 2012, ‘Action formation and ascription’, in J Sidnell & T Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, UK, pp. 103–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, A 2005, ‘Language as social action: a study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service’, in A Hakulinen & M Selting (eds.), Studies in discourse and grammar, vol. 17, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 209–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L 2018, ‘Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Hepburn, A 2003, ‘“I’m a bit concerned”–early actions and psychological constructions in a child protection helpline’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 197–240. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Wetherell, M 1987, Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H 1995, Lectures on conversation, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, EA 1997, ‘Whose text? Whose context?’, Discourse & Society, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–87. doi:10.1177/0957926597008002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, EA 2004, ‘On dispensability’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 95–149. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, C, Potter, J & Hepburn, A 2015, ‘Advice-implicative actions: using interrogatives and assessments to deliver advice in mundane conversation’, Discourse Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 317–42. doi:10.1177/1461445615571199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M 2018, ‘Social deontics: a nano-level approach to human power play’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 369–89. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M & Peräkylä, A 2014, ‘Three orders in the organization of human action: on the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations’, Language in Society, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 185–207. doi:10.1017/S0047404514000037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T & Barnes, RK 2018, ‘Treatment recommendation actions, contingencies, and responses: an introduction’, Health Communication, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1331–34. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1350914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stommel, W & Molder, HT 2018, ‘Empathically designed responses as a gateway to advice in Dutch counseling calls’, Discourse Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 523–43. doi:10.1177/1461445618754436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennent, Emma. Identity and Help in Calls to Victim Support. Victoria University of Wellington, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Tilegã, C & Stokoe, E 2015, Discursive psychology. Classic and contemporary issues, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S 2017, Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, Ann  (2015).“But whose side are you on?” Doing being independent in telephone-mediated dispute resolution. In F. Chevalier & J. Moore (Eds.). Producing and Managing Restricted Activities. Avoidance and withholding in institutional interaction (151–179). John Benjamin Publishing: Amsterdam
   Google Scholar